Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Jiraphan Srisomphan

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 3. Model of the PJBL-SCRUM online system Paper—The Design of a Learning Process for Promoting Teamwork using Project-Based Learning...

Figure 3 Model of the PJBL-SCRUM online system Paper—The Design of a Learning Process for Promoting Teamwork using Project-Based Learning...

Related Figures (6)

Scrum is a subset of Agile software development. It is a lightweight process frame- work for Agile development and is the one most widely-used. A Scrum process is dis- tinguished from other Agile processes through the use of specific concepts and prac- tices, divided into the three categories of Roles, Artifacts, and Time Boxes. These and other terms used in Scrum are defined below. Scrum is most often used to manage complex software and product development, using iterative and incremental practices. Scrum significantly increases productivity and reduces time-to-benefits compared with classic “waterfall” processes. Scrum processes enable organizations to adjust smoothly to rapidly-changing requirements, and produce a product that meets evolving business goals [9].
Scrum is a subset of Agile software development. It is a lightweight process frame- work for Agile development and is the one most widely-used. A Scrum process is dis- tinguished from other Agile processes through the use of specific concepts and prac- tices, divided into the three categories of Roles, Artifacts, and Time Boxes. These and other terms used in Scrum are defined below. Scrum is most often used to manage complex software and product development, using iterative and incremental practices. Scrum significantly increases productivity and reduces time-to-benefits compared with classic “waterfall” processes. Scrum processes enable organizations to adjust smoothly to rapidly-changing requirements, and produce a product that meets evolving business goals [9].
Table 2. Mapping of the learning process between PJBL and SCRUM According to the Mapping result in Table 2, learning process between PJBL and SCRUM, the model of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development (PJBL-SCRUM).as presented in Figure 3.
Table 2. Mapping of the learning process between PJBL and SCRUM According to the Mapping result in Table 2, learning process between PJBL and SCRUM, the model of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development (PJBL-SCRUM).as presented in Figure 3.
Fig. 2. Sample Diagram of Scrum of Scrums (SoS) [23]
Fig. 2. Sample Diagram of Scrum of Scrums (SoS) [23]
Table 4. Results of the suitability assessment of the steps of the PIBL module Table 4 shows that the experts strongly agree overall in terms of the PJBL (with a total mean of 4.88). Most of the experts agreed that the Project topic,Reviewing docu- ments, Working process, Writing the report, and Presentation ( = 4.90) were suitable. This information demonstrates that the experts agreed that Planning and drafting was the step that was awarded the lowest rating (x = 4.80).
Table 4. Results of the suitability assessment of the steps of the PIBL module Table 4 shows that the experts strongly agree overall in terms of the PJBL (with a total mean of 4.88). Most of the experts agreed that the Project topic,Reviewing docu- ments, Working process, Writing the report, and Presentation ( = 4.90) were suitable. This information demonstrates that the experts agreed that Planning and drafting was the step that was awarded the lowest rating (x = 4.80).
Table 5. Results of the suitability assessment of the concept of Agile software development Table 5 shows that the experts strongly agreed overall with regard to the learning process of the concept of Agile software development (with a total mean of 4.80). Most of the experts agreed that Sprint Review (X = 4.97) was suitable. This is followed by Daily Scrum (¥ = 4.88). This information demonstrates that the experts agreed that Product Backlog was the step that was awarded the lowest rating (x = 4.60).
Table 5. Results of the suitability assessment of the concept of Agile software development Table 5 shows that the experts strongly agreed overall with regard to the learning process of the concept of Agile software development (with a total mean of 4.80). Most of the experts agreed that Sprint Review (X = 4.97) was suitable. This is followed by Daily Scrum (¥ = 4.88). This information demonstrates that the experts agreed that Product Backlog was the step that was awarded the lowest rating (x = 4.60).
Table 6. Results of the suitability assessment of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development Table 6 shows the overall result with regard to the suitability of the learning man- agement model of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development for computer students was at the highest level, with a mean score of 4.80 and a standard deviation of 0.39. When considered separately, it was found that the Agile working process as part of the Scrum framework module was rated at the highest level (x = 4.97, S.D. = 0.11), followed by the Project-based learning process and the Teamwork skill process, respectively.
Table 6. Results of the suitability assessment of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development Table 6 shows the overall result with regard to the suitability of the learning man- agement model of the learning process for promoting teamwork using PJBL and the concept of Agile software development for computer students was at the highest level, with a mean score of 4.80 and a standard deviation of 0.39. When considered separately, it was found that the Agile working process as part of the Scrum framework module was rated at the highest level (x = 4.97, S.D. = 0.11), followed by the Project-based learning process and the Teamwork skill process, respectively.
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved