Table 2 Summary of numerical approximation schemes
Related Figures (11)
Figure 1. The fine mesh (thin lines) and coarse mesh (thick lines)
Figure 2. Monodomain 2D: electrical activation at (c = 10,y = 10) mm
Figure 3. Bidomain 2D: electrical activation at (« = 10,y = 10) mm
Figure 2. Monodomain 2D: electrical activation at (c = 10,y = 10) mm
Figure 4. Monodomain 3D: electrical activation at (x = 1.5,y = 1.5,z = 1.5) mn
Figure 5. Bidomain 3D: electrical activation at (w# = 1.5,y = 1.5,z = 1.5) mr
Figure 4. Monodomain 3D: electrical activation at (x = 1.5,y = 1.5,z = 1.5) mn
Table 4. Results of the 3D Simulations
scheme like BE (not suffering from such a long assembling time) would lead to ¢
higher overall improvement.
Table 4. Results of the 3D Simulations
scheme like BE (not suffering from such a long assembling time) would lead to ¢
higher overall improvement.
Figure 6. Monodomain 2D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented
Total computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
Figure 7. Bidomain 2D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented. Tota.
computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
Figure 6. Monodomain 2D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented
Total computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
Figure 8. Monodomain 3D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented
Total computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
Figure 9. Bidomain 3D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented. Tota:
computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
Figure 8. Monodomain 3D: Performance of the different numerical schemes presented
Total computation time and most time consuming parts shown.
