Fig. 1. The hierarchical risk breakdown structure. Standard terms for quantifying likelihood A Fragment of the common language for describing construction project risks Table 3 third catalogue which defines the relationships between the risks and the actions. These relationships are also generic, hence for a defined project risk — based on a generic risk item from the risk catalogue — a set of from which one may be selected to hel come the risk. The risk-action relations actions is available p alleviate or over- hips are all context dependent, and this dependency is based on work classifi- cation. For example, a generic risk which may apply to both earthworks and concreting activities can have different remedial actions associated with it contexts. for each of those 3.5. Risk and action catalogues Fig. 5. The three-tier client/server architecture.
