Figure 3 In order to increase the feasibility of the new protocol we aimed for the best possible recovery of the diamines (R,R)-1 and (S,S)-1 from the inclusion complexes. After trying various acids for the liberation of BINOL we found that the tartaric acids were the most suitable for our purposes. Thus after dissolution of complex (R)-2-(R,R)-1-toluene in methanol/water (10:1) and addition 1.1 equiv. of tartaric acid the corresponding (R,R)-1 tartrate salt precipitated almost quantitatively and could be separated by filtration. (R)-BINOL pre- cipitated from the filtrate during the removal of methanol from the solution and was filtered and after With both enantiomers of trans-cyclohexane-l,2- diamine easily available, we attempted to find an improved and more reliable method for the resolution of BINOL 2. Kawashima and Hirata described in their method? that, in toluene, the more soluble inclusion complex, (S)-2:(R,R)-1, can be obtained from the mother liquor in 96% ee (measured by HPLC of the liberated BINOL) after separation of the less soluble (R)-2:(R,R)-1-toluene complex. We also made this observation. However, in contrast to the described pro- cedure, after removal of volatiles, we were not able to increase further the ee by simply washing the residue with toluene. Recrystallisation of the liberated (S)- BINOL also did not give an improved ee. Also the reported procedure does not give details for the recov- ery of the precious, enantiopure diamine, which also is a valid factor for economic feasibility. There are actu- ally two points in the procedure at which the relevant