Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by basem Alsaidy

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 6: Amylase production before and after exposure to laser 632.8 nm, differences were assessed by One Way ANOVA NS, non-significant atp>0.05. ***, significant atp<0.001. The highest amylase production is highlighted in grey for each strain.

Table 6 Amylase production before and after exposure to laser 632.8 nm, differences were assessed by One Way ANOVA NS, non-significant atp>0.05. ***, significant atp<0.001. The highest amylase production is highlighted in grey for each strain.

Related Figures (9)

in Nocardiopsis sp. 3 from 1.54 mm to 2.1 mm, Pseudonocardia sp. 2 from 2.7 mm to 3.55 mm, and Micromonospora sp. 1 from 1.58 mm to 7.12 mm. In all strains, the exposure for 20 min has in- fluenced the colony size more than the 10 min ex- posure. Figure 2: Schematic preview for the exposure of isolates to ultraviolet radiation
in Nocardiopsis sp. 3 from 1.54 mm to 2.1 mm, Pseudonocardia sp. 2 from 2.7 mm to 3.55 mm, and Micromonospora sp. 1 from 1.58 mm to 7.12 mm. In all strains, the exposure for 20 min has in- fluenced the colony size more than the 10 min ex- posure. Figure 2: Schematic preview for the exposure of isolates to ultraviolet radiation
Figure 1: Schematic preview for isolates before and after exposure of radiations.
Figure 1: Schematic preview for isolates before and after exposure of radiations.
Table 1: Colony size responses to different radiation doses (control, UV-10 min, UV-20 min) grown on SC agar medium. Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. ***, significant at p <0.001. ABC.D.EF T etters refereeing to different groups, arranged between different exposure times and different strains.
Table 1: Colony size responses to different radiation doses (control, UV-10 min, UV-20 min) grown on SC agar medium. Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. ***, significant at p <0.001. ABC.D.EF T etters refereeing to different groups, arranged between different exposure times and different strains.
Table 2: Color changes in the fermentation products of the actinomycetes’ strains after UV radiation and incubation at 28 +2 °C for 7 days Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. *,**, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01, 0.001. AColor code for fermentation products: (1) pale yellow, (2) yellow, (3) deep yellow, (4) pale brown, (5) Brown, (6) deep brown.
Table 2: Color changes in the fermentation products of the actinomycetes’ strains after UV radiation and incubation at 28 +2 °C for 7 days Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. *,**, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01, 0.001. AColor code for fermentation products: (1) pale yellow, (2) yellow, (3) deep yellow, (4) pale brown, (5) Brown, (6) deep brown.
Table 3: Colony size responses to different laser radiation doses (control, L-10 min, L-20 min) grown on SC agar medium. Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. NS,non-significant at p>0.05. *, **, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01,0.001. ABCD. | etters refereeing to different groups, arranged between different exposure times and different strains.
Table 3: Colony size responses to different laser radiation doses (control, L-10 min, L-20 min) grown on SC agar medium. Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. NS,non-significant at p>0.05. *, **, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01,0.001. ABCD. | etters refereeing to different groups, arranged between different exposure times and different strains.
Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. *,**, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01, 0.001 AColor code for fermentation products: (1) pale yellow, (2) yellow, (3) deep yellow,(4) pale brown, (5) Brown, (6) deep brown
Differences were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. *,**, ***, significant at p<0.05, 0.01, 0.001 AColor code for fermentation products: (1) pale yellow, (2) yellow, (3) deep yellow,(4) pale brown, (5) Brown, (6) deep brown
Figure 3: Schematic preview for the exposure of isolates to monochromatic laser radiation
Figure 3: Schematic preview for the exposure of isolates to monochromatic laser radiation
Table 5: Lipase production before and after exposure of laser 632.8nm, differences were assessed by One Way ANOVA NS, non-significant at p>0.05. ***, significant at p<0.001. The highest lipase production is highlighted in grey for each strain.
Table 5: Lipase production before and after exposure of laser 632.8nm, differences were assessed by One Way ANOVA NS, non-significant at p>0.05. ***, significant at p<0.001. The highest lipase production is highlighted in grey for each strain.
Table 7: Antimicrobial activity of the metabolic extracts from wild and laser-irradiated Micromonospora sp. 1 strains
Table 7: Antimicrobial activity of the metabolic extracts from wild and laser-irradiated Micromonospora sp. 1 strains
Related topics:
Radiation Biology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved