Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Radhika Sreedharan

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
*sec for second Table I explains the reference time to determine the assessment of the static balance of the subject.

Table 1 *sec for second Table I explains the reference time to determine the assessment of the static balance of the subject.

Related Figures (8)

Fig. 2 Testing of Featured Weighing Tools Testing of featured weighing tools image capture of the soles of the feet is carried out on grade 1 elementary school children with an age range of 5-9 years. Subjects are directed to line up and then climb the scales one by | to take an image of the soles of their feet. It can be seen in fig. 2 that children process the subject climbing the scales to take an image of the soles of the feet. The process of capturing images of the soles of the feet takes a short time, which is less than 1 minute. This process also uses a webcam as a tool to capture images of the soles of the feet.
Fig. 2 Testing of Featured Weighing Tools Testing of featured weighing tools image capture of the soles of the feet is carried out on grade 1 elementary school children with an age range of 5-9 years. Subjects are directed to line up and then climb the scales one by | to take an image of the soles of their feet. It can be seen in fig. 2 that children process the subject climbing the scales to take an image of the soles of the feet. The process of capturing images of the soles of the feet takes a short time, which is less than 1 minute. This process also uses a webcam as a tool to capture images of the soles of the feet.
The stage in making feature scales is to make a tool design. First, the design of the featured scale tool can be seen in fig. 1 material used is a weight scale with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and an Aukey PC-LMIE webcam with a maximum resolution of 192 x 1080 pixels. The scale's base uses teak wood and iron poles 25 cm long. The material that has been combined is then tested before taking it on the subject. Testing the tool was tested on grade | elementary school children, and the results of the test got a good and exact image of the soles of the feet and wet footprint results.
The stage in making feature scales is to make a tool design. First, the design of the featured scale tool can be seen in fig. 1 material used is a weight scale with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and an Aukey PC-LMIE webcam with a maximum resolution of 192 x 1080 pixels. The scale's base uses teak wood and iron poles 25 cm long. The material that has been combined is then tested before taking it on the subject. Testing the tool was tested on grade | elementary school children, and the results of the test got a good and exact image of the soles of the feet and wet footprint results.
Ihe image processing stage goes through several stages. Ihe first is Thresholding, where the process, based on the difference in the degree of imagery, separates the object from the background in an image based on the difference in the level of brightness or the light darkness and changes the colour of the image to black and white. The second stage is Segmentation. This program separates the object (foreground) from the background. The output of the image segmentation results is binary, namely, 1 when white (object) and 0 when black background). The third stage of Estimation of Pixels in Reference is a program to identify each existing pixel into a value. The fourth stage of Scale Conversion is to confer between two different sizes, starting the conference from pixels 0 centimetres to facilitate processing for Clarke's angel method measurement. The formula used to determine the degree angle of the sole is in equation (1). The fifth stage is plotting points o determine the point of the binary number line that will be carried out by drawing the foot edge line, leg length, and foot width to perform Clarke's Angel angle calculations. The last stage is Transpose, turning rows into columns to simplify the image processing process. which can be seen on the fig. 3 Is an image of the process from image processing until the results of Clarke's Angel method lines and the degree of foot arch are obtained. Fig. 4 shows stages in image processing. Fig. 3 The Result of the Image of the Soles of the Feet With the Method of Clare's Angel
Ihe image processing stage goes through several stages. Ihe first is Thresholding, where the process, based on the difference in the degree of imagery, separates the object from the background in an image based on the difference in the level of brightness or the light darkness and changes the colour of the image to black and white. The second stage is Segmentation. This program separates the object (foreground) from the background. The output of the image segmentation results is binary, namely, 1 when white (object) and 0 when black background). The third stage of Estimation of Pixels in Reference is a program to identify each existing pixel into a value. The fourth stage of Scale Conversion is to confer between two different sizes, starting the conference from pixels 0 centimetres to facilitate processing for Clarke's angel method measurement. The formula used to determine the degree angle of the sole is in equation (1). The fifth stage is plotting points o determine the point of the binary number line that will be carried out by drawing the foot edge line, leg length, and foot width to perform Clarke's Angel angle calculations. The last stage is Transpose, turning rows into columns to simplify the image processing process. which can be seen on the fig. 3 Is an image of the process from image processing until the results of Clarke's Angel method lines and the degree of foot arch are obtained. Fig. 4 shows stages in image processing. Fig. 3 The Result of the Image of the Soles of the Feet With the Method of Clare's Angel
Fig. 4 Flowchat Stages of Image Processing
Fig. 4 Flowchat Stages of Image Processing
ASA Aa WET FOOTPRINT TEST CALCULATION RESULTS a Table III shows the results of the data on the wet footprint test. The results on the wet footprint test show the same number in children with normal leg shapes, flatfoot and high arch. The difference is only in the degree of the soles of his feet. This is because the size of the sole on the wet footprint test produces a value that is greater than the size of the sole from the image on t he footprint scale.
ASA Aa WET FOOTPRINT TEST CALCULATION RESULTS a Table III shows the results of the data on the wet footprint test. The results on the wet footprint test show the same number in children with normal leg shapes, flatfoot and high arch. The difference is only in the degree of the soles of his feet. This is because the size of the sole on the wet footprint test produces a value that is greater than the size of the sole from the image on t he footprint scale.
4faea i FEATURED SCALE MEASUREMENT RESULTS Of the 30 respondents, 10 children had normal foot (33.33%), 20 children had flatfoot (66.67%), and none of the students had a cavus arch foot sole shape, as written in Table II. This result was obtained from the image of the foot captured on the footprint scale and the image data processed in MATLAB.
4faea i FEATURED SCALE MEASUREMENT RESULTS Of the 30 respondents, 10 children had normal foot (33.33%), 20 children had flatfoot (66.67%), and none of the students had a cavus arch foot sole shape, as written in Table II. This result was obtained from the image of the foot captured on the footprint scale and the image data processed in MATLAB.
This process is the final stage of the study. The classification of the soles of the feet is the process of determining the shape of the soles of the feet of the subjects, including the normal form of an arch, high arch or cavus arch. Determination of this classification by looking at the results of image processing which are compared with the results of the wet footprint test and strengthened by the results of the stork stand test.
This process is the final stage of the study. The classification of the soles of the feet is the process of determining the shape of the soles of the feet of the subjects, including the normal form of an arch, high arch or cavus arch. Determination of this classification by looking at the results of image processing which are compared with the results of the wet footprint test and strengthened by the results of the stork stand test.
ae RS A STORK STAND TEST MEASUREMENT RESULTS
ae RS A STORK STAND TEST MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Related topics:
AviationIndustrial Internet
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved