Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 10 shows a comparison between approach II, Eqs. (61),(62),(63),(64), and approach I, which again gives Eqs. (55),(56), and the numerical Hopf curves obtained by use of DDE-BIFTOOL. Fig.10 shows that approach II gives better results than approach I. However approach I still gives a good fit for the lower Hopf curve as in the case of Eq. (40).

Figure 10 shows a comparison between approach II, Eqs. (61),(62),(63),(64), and approach I, which again gives Eqs. (55),(56), and the numerical Hopf curves obtained by use of DDE-BIFTOOL. Fig.10 shows that approach II gives better results than approach I. However approach I still gives a good fit for the lower Hopf curve as in the case of Eq. (40).