Figure 7 Example FMU implementing the SE interface.
Related Figures (7)
Figure 1. Comparison of interface types Figure 2. Schematic view of data flow between user, the solver of the importer and the FMU for Model Exchange. Figure 3. Schematic view of data flow between user, the co- simulation algorithm of the importer and the FMU for Co- Simulation. Compared to Figure 2, the solver is part of the FMU, and not part of the importer. Figure 4. Schematic view of data flow between user, the sched- uler of the importer and the FMU for Scheduled Execution Figure 5. Example supervisory control system and how the new features of FMI CS can improve its simulation. Finally, the Supervisor FMU may reconfigure the Con- troller FMU when a certain condition is met. When this happens, the Supervisor FMU may signal that stepping phase needs to be halted, and event handing is needed. Figure 6. Example clocked control system. Figure 8. Example execution trace of Figure 7. Task N corre- sponds to execution of partition N, as detailed in Figure 7.
