Table 1 | Cross-tabulation of ORP ranges with smell
Related Figures (4)
gure 1 | Ambient conditions around and inside pit latrine structures. Box represents 50% of the data points, whisker represent minimum and maximum, line in box represents the median. Graphs with different letters (a-d) are significantly different from each other, p < 0.05. Figure 2 | Environmental conditions in the pit. Box represents 50% of the data points, whiskers represent minimum and maximum values, lines in the box represent the median. yu is the mean + standard deviation. Figure 3 | Pit latrine ORP ranges at different depths of the pit content: (a) surface of the pit content, (b) 0.5 m below the surface and (c) 1m below the surface of the pit conten Table 2 | Cross-tabulation of ORP ranges with Fly nuisance statistically significant (G=0.451, p=0.277). The results surrounding buildings as pit latrines in urban slums are placed close to the houses due to overcrowding. While ven- ilation pipes are meant to increase air flow in the latrines, he results from the study showed no air movements within the superstructures. This is because, while the venti- ation pipes of the VIP latrines are well above the highest point of the latrine roof, they did not exceed the roofs of he nearby residential buildings. Air movement in VIPs is also constrained by inappropriate vent pipe sizing and ocation of openings (Nakagiri et al. 2015). surrounding buildings as pit latrines in urban slums are
