Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 4 – uploaded by Emmanuel Kiprop

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 4. Cases of system of replication dynamics and equilibrium point Opportunity costs of the company’s risk management and food safety risk management

Table 4 Cases of system of replication dynamics and equilibrium point Opportunity costs of the company’s risk management and food safety risk management

Related Figures (9)

Table 1. Examples of major food safety incidents in China from 2005 to 2019 Note: Data are based on the author's search for relevant news and government notices.
Table 1. Examples of major food safety incidents in China from 2005 to 2019 Note: Data are based on the author's search for relevant news and government notices.
also the opportunity cost of choosing the risk prevention rather than food fraud. company must consider not only the actual costs and benefits of food safety risk management but
also the opportunity cost of choosing the risk prevention rather than food fraud. company must consider not only the actual costs and benefits of food safety risk management but
igure 2. Analysis of the formation mechanism of the company's food safety risk management
igure 2. Analysis of the formation mechanism of the company's food safety risk management
Table 2. Cost benefits of a company’s food safety risk management
Table 2. Cost benefits of a company’s food safety risk management
Table 3. Benefit matrix of food safety risk management for large and small companies evolutionary games is to find the Nash equilibrium with mixed strategies.
Table 3. Benefit matrix of food safety risk management for large and small companies evolutionary games is to find the Nash equilibrium with mixed strategies.
Table 5. Local stability analysis for case 2 Inference 1 from Result 1: For a certain risk prevention behavior or certain risk prevention
Table 5. Local stability analysis for case 2 Inference 1 from Result 1: For a certain risk prevention behavior or certain risk prevention
Table 6. Local stability analysis for case 1 both large and small companies with evolutionary stability strategies will choose risk prevention he following three, large and small companies choose food fraud. The first is the benefit V that
Table 6. Local stability analysis for case 1 both large and small companies with evolutionary stability strategies will choose risk prevention he following three, large and small companies choose food fraud. The first is the benefit V that
Table 7. Local stability analysis for case 3 part of the cost of large companies, where Conclusion 3 can be drawn. depends on the cost structure of large companies. This explains that large-scale companies take r(Lz + aD), only if AC >V+L,+ (1 —Y1)D, the inequality holds, and both large and small
Table 7. Local stability analysis for case 3 part of the cost of large companies, where Conclusion 3 can be drawn. depends on the cost structure of large companies. This explains that large-scale companies take r(Lz + aD), only if AC >V+L,+ (1 —Y1)D, the inequality holds, and both large and small
Figure 3. Phase diagram of the dynamic evolution of a five-equilibrium system participants who take another behavior will disappear in the evolution. In Figure 3, the evolution of the system cannot be achieved in one step. Therefore, for a Both of the aforementioned states are evolutionary stable closed states, and in either state,
Figure 3. Phase diagram of the dynamic evolution of a five-equilibrium system participants who take another behavior will disappear in the evolution. In Figure 3, the evolution of the system cannot be achieved in one step. Therefore, for a Both of the aforementioned states are evolutionary stable closed states, and in either state,
Related topics:
BusinessFood SafetyFood Safety Management
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved