Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Vishal Solanki

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD) Volume 3, Issue 2, February -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

Table 2 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD) Volume 3, Issue 2, February -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

Related Figures (4)

As per DOE generated testing is done for flank wear and surface roughness of tool and work respectively. Result obtained from that is in given table . Cutting temperature range for this investigation was 250 C to 290 these results are obtained by experiment on AISI 201 material of 50 mm diameter. DOE values are taken for conducting experimental work 27 experiment done while machining of AISI 201 turning. Material examines under this DOE on CNC machine. Programmed and turning carried out. Investigation carried with help of carbide tool. After experimental work tool is examined for flank wear and material is examined for surface roughness and found following readings given in table 4. Experiments carried out according to DOE noting ee EE DOE! SEPA EE INDE IAA EIPILD EE III ISISE- A A NEES Se To define all design of experiments and they can be calculated by feeding values in Minitab Software. In Minitab factorial design of experiment is used for generating DOE and this will give values of the variances those who are taken while machining one experiment.
As per DOE generated testing is done for flank wear and surface roughness of tool and work respectively. Result obtained from that is in given table . Cutting temperature range for this investigation was 250 C to 290 these results are obtained by experiment on AISI 201 material of 50 mm diameter. DOE values are taken for conducting experimental work 27 experiment done while machining of AISI 201 turning. Material examines under this DOE on CNC machine. Programmed and turning carried out. Investigation carried with help of carbide tool. After experimental work tool is examined for flank wear and material is examined for surface roughness and found following readings given in table 4. Experiments carried out according to DOE noting ee EE DOE! SEPA EE INDE IAA EIPILD EE III ISISE- A A NEES Se To define all design of experiments and they can be calculated by feeding values in Minitab Software. In Minitab factorial design of experiment is used for generating DOE and this will give values of the variances those who are taken while machining one experiment.
Figure-1. Analysis of Variance for Flank Wear Je SAAS S SE NUR VCR RCREENW EEE LVRRL NE RCE OL BERENS UU BEEUOU VEEUCLEEVLY pet CARAINULED As to find out the parameter which is more effect on our experimental reading among three variance taken by us namely % of Nano boric acid Suspension, feed rate and Depth of cut. Result analyzing is done to check which factor is more affect to work surface roughness and flank wear. Result is analyzed in MINITAB software by fully nested ANOVA and step of that is given below: First Step: Select Stat> Fully nested ANOVA
Figure-1. Analysis of Variance for Flank Wear Je SAAS S SE NUR VCR RCREENW EEE LVRRL NE RCE OL BERENS UU BEEUOU VEEUCLEEVLY pet CARAINULED As to find out the parameter which is more effect on our experimental reading among three variance taken by us namely % of Nano boric acid Suspension, feed rate and Depth of cut. Result analyzing is done to check which factor is more affect to work surface roughness and flank wear. Result is analyzed in MINITAB software by fully nested ANOVA and step of that is given below: First Step: Select Stat> Fully nested ANOVA
International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD) Volume 3, Issue 2, February -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406 Among all the reading Nano boric suspension affect the turning process by 77.01% for surface roughness and 60.17% for flank wear. This analysis says that boric acid suspension affects the turning process more than other variance.
International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD) Volume 3, Issue 2, February -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406 Among all the reading Nano boric suspension affect the turning process by 77.01% for surface roughness and 60.17% for flank wear. This analysis says that boric acid suspension affects the turning process more than other variance.
Figure-3. behaviour curve when feed rate or depth of cut kept constant Graph shows behaviour curve when depth of cut is kept constant green line 0.50 % Nano boric acid suspension gives lowest surface roughness Figure-3.
Figure-3. behaviour curve when feed rate or depth of cut kept constant Graph shows behaviour curve when depth of cut is kept constant green line 0.50 % Nano boric acid suspension gives lowest surface roughness Figure-3.
Related topics:
Materials Science
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved