Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 19 – uploaded by Prince Francis Mulbah

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Source: Survey Data (2018) Natural rubber (NR) Table 3:Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Kernel-Based matching

Table 3 Source: Survey Data (2018) Natural rubber (NR) Table 3:Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Kernel-Based matching

Related Figures (33)

enterprises like oil palm (Abdulla and Arshad, 2017) 2.1.3 Constraints in rubber production by smallholder farmers The constraints in rubber production are categorized as production and marketing constraints.
enterprises like oil palm (Abdulla and Arshad, 2017) 2.1.3 Constraints in rubber production by smallholder farmers The constraints in rubber production are categorized as production and marketing constraints.
natural rubber
natural rubber
Table 4. 1 Socioeconomic characteristics of sample households by co-operative membership
Table 4. 1 Socioeconomic characteristics of sample households by co-operative membership
focus on increasing the production of NR than marketing. Figure 4. 1: Types of training access by co-operative membership helps to increase the production of latex. The results indicate that the NR co-operative is mostly
focus on increasing the production of NR than marketing. Figure 4. 1: Types of training access by co-operative membership helps to increase the production of latex. The results indicate that the NR co-operative is mostly
Table 4. 2 Comparing the institutional and farm characteristics of natural rubber farmers
Table 4. 2 Comparing the institutional and farm characteristics of natural rubber farmers
Average prices offered per 1kg of natural rubber in April 2018 at various selling outlets in Gibi and Kakata Districts * Significance at 10 percent Table 4. 3: Selling outlets by co-operative membership operative farmers (59 percent) sold NR to processors and large scale farmers, while 20 percent
Average prices offered per 1kg of natural rubber in April 2018 at various selling outlets in Gibi and Kakata Districts * Significance at 10 percent Table 4. 3: Selling outlets by co-operative membership operative farmers (59 percent) sold NR to processors and large scale farmers, while 20 percent
Table 4. 5 Farm characteristics by selling outlets
Table 4. 5 Farm characteristics by selling outlets
Table 4.6 Determinants of household choice of selling outlets at farm-gate or at AWs..... . 48%... 2... 4G kd alternative markets is not dependent on whether a farmer is a member of the NR co-operative
Table 4.6 Determinants of household choice of selling outlets at farm-gate or at AWs..... . 48%... 2... 4G kd alternative markets is not dependent on whether a farmer is a member of the NR co-operative
NNM: Nearest neighbor matching, RM: Radius matching, KBM: Kernel-based matching neighbor, radius and kernel-based matching algorithms Table 4. 8 Statistical test to evaluate the quality of the matching estimators with nearest The percentage reduction in NNM and KBM is greater than 20 percent. This conforms with
NNM: Nearest neighbor matching, RM: Radius matching, KBM: Kernel-based matching neighbor, radius and kernel-based matching algorithms Table 4. 8 Statistical test to evaluate the quality of the matching estimators with nearest The percentage reduction in NNM and KBM is greater than 20 percent. This conforms with
eK * Significance levels at | and5 percent respectively Outcome variable: farm Income in US$ from 2017-2018 production under different matching algorithms from 2017-2018 Table 4. 9 Impact of rubber co-operative on farmer income from natural rubber
eK * Significance levels at | and5 percent respectively Outcome variable: farm Income in US$ from 2017-2018 production under different matching algorithms from 2017-2018 Table 4. 9 Impact of rubber co-operative on farmer income from natural rubber
to influence household choice of selling outlets Pearson correlation matrix for continuous explanatory variables hypothesized to influence household choice of selling outlets
to influence household choice of selling outlets Pearson correlation matrix for continuous explanatory variables hypothesized to influence household choice of selling outlets
household participation in the natural rubber co-operative Pearson correlation matrix for continuous explanatory variables hypothesized to influence household participation in the natural rubber co-operative
household participation in the natural rubber co-operative Pearson correlation matrix for continuous explanatory variables hypothesized to influence household participation in the natural rubber co-operative
Table 1: Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Radius matching
Table 1: Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Radius matching
Table 2:Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Nearest Neighbor
Table 2:Covariate balancing tests for selection bias before and after matching using Nearest Neighbor
Source : Survey Data (2018)
Source : Survey Data (2018)
If yes, what type of training and which institution offered it?
If yes, what type of training and which institution offered it?
Related topics:
BusinessAgricultural Economics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved