Ten right-handed elite male badminton players who are studying in who at least participated in state-level or university level were randomly selected for the study. We were interested in Analysis during the point of contact. Go Pro Hero 7, 2D camera whose frequency was 129 f/sec was used to capture the video. A video camera was mounted on a tripod at a height of 1.05 meters from the ground. The subjects were instructed to take a stance position in the centre of the court to prepare to hit the shuttle. The subjects got enough time to warm-up. 2D data including wrist joint angle, elbow joint Angle, shoulder joint Angle were extracted by using Kinovea 0.8.27 software. For the Analysis of the data SPSS 20 software was used. One-way ANOVA was used to see mean differences among forehand overhead smash, forehand overhead clear, forehand overhead drop. The subjects possessed a minimum deviation in Physical characteristics (Age, height, weight, and fat percentage to measures the physiological demography Stadiomerter, Grip strength dynamometer, Skinfold calliper were used. Table 1: Physical Profile of Selected Subjects of the Study In the table 1 showed that mean Height was 168.80 and the standard deviation was 3.93, mean weight was 62.50 and the standard deviation was 4.92, mean Grip strength was 44.01 and the standard deviation was 6.20, mean of abdominal was 13.60 and the standard deviation was 1.71, mean of Iliac Crest was 7.90 and the standard deviation was 2.60, mean of triceps was 7.90 and standard deviation 2.76, mean of the thigh was 13.60 and standard deviation 2.06 (Verma, 2011). Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 8, No 4, 2020, pp 522-529 https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8451 Table 3: ANOVA table of the shoulder joint, elbow joint, and wrist joint In shoulder Joint, the p-value was 0.00 which was less than 0.05 hence researcher can reveal that there was a significant difference. In Elbow joint the p-value was found to be 0.031 which was less than 0.05 hence null hypotheses was rejected. In the case of wrist joint p-value was found 0.029 which was less than 0.05 hence the null hypothesis was rejected (Verma & Salam, 2019). Table 4: Post hoc test table of the Shoulder joint, elbow joint, and wrist joint As the F-value is a significance post hoc test required to be done. In comparison, it can be seen that in the case of the shoulder joint when smash compared with clear it was found to be significant as the p-value for the mean difference was 0.00 which was less than 0.05.in the same way when smash was compared with drop it was found to be insignificant as the p-value was 0.09 which was more than 0.05. when clear was compared with drop the p-value was found to be significant as the value was 0.04 which was less than 0.05 (Verma & Salam, 2019). In elbow joint when smash compared with clear p-value was 0.01 which was significant in nature as the value was less than 0.05, in the same way
Connect with 287M+ leading minds in your field
Discover breakthrough research and expand your academic network
