Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Jonas Kunst

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 3. Estimated structural equation model. Coefficients for each sample displayed in the following order: German-Turks/French-Maghrebis/British- Pakistanis. Following estimates not displayed due to lack of space: correlations between Integration (I), Separation (S) and Assimilation (A), rl, S=—.49***/—.47***/—.27***, rl, A=.02/—.13*/-.15*. Correlations between Stress (S), Socio-cultural Adaptation (SA) and Self-Esteem (SE), rS,SA=—.15**/—.18**/—.10, rS, SE= —.26***/—.31***/—.14***. Demographic variables are controlled for. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.

Figure 3 Estimated structural equation model. Coefficients for each sample displayed in the following order: German-Turks/French-Maghrebis/British- Pakistanis. Following estimates not displayed due to lack of space: correlations between Integration (I), Separation (S) and Assimilation (A), rl, S=—.49***/—.47***/—.27***, rl, A=.02/—.13*/-.15*. Correlations between Stress (S), Socio-cultural Adaptation (SA) and Self-Esteem (SE), rS,SA=—.15**/—.18**/—.10, rS, SE= —.26***/—.31***/—.14***. Demographic variables are controlled for. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.

Related Figures (6)

Fig. 1. Hypothesized relations between the study variables. J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
Fig. 1. Hypothesized relations between the study variables. J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
Missing percentage corresponds to “other”. General characteristics of the population. Table 1
Missing percentage corresponds to “other”. General characteristics of the population. Table 1
GT, German-Turks (n= 301); FM, French-Maghrebis (n= 302); BP, British-Pakistanis (n= 266); CFI, Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Erro of Approximation; sRMR, standardized Root Mean Square Residual. * Measurement weights and covariances were constrained. * p<.05. Psychometric properties and structural equivalence for the study variables. Table 2
GT, German-Turks (n= 301); FM, French-Maghrebis (n= 302); BP, British-Pakistanis (n= 266); CFI, Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Erro of Approximation; sRMR, standardized Root Mean Square Residual. * Measurement weights and covariances were constrained. * p<.05. Psychometric properties and structural equivalence for the study variables. Table 2
Fig.2. Preferences for acculturation strategies for each sample. PSAE = Perceived Societal Assimilation Expectation, PESE = Perceived Ethnic Peers’ Separation Expectation. J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
Fig.2. Preferences for acculturation strategies for each sample. PSAE = Perceived Societal Assimilation Expectation, PESE = Perceived Ethnic Peers’ Separation Expectation. J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
Means, standard deviations and correlations between the study variables. Table 3 J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
Means, standard deviations and correlations between the study variables. Table 3 J.R. Kunst, D.L. Sam / International Journal of Intercultural Relations xxx (2013) xxx-xxx
CFI, Comparative Fit Index; sRMR, standardized Root Mean Square Residual; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation * p<.05. Fit indices for structural equation models across groups. Table 4
CFI, Comparative Fit Index; sRMR, standardized Root Mean Square Residual; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation * p<.05. Fit indices for structural equation models across groups. Table 4
Related topics:
ReligionMulticulturalismGlobalizationCross-Cultural PsychologyIntergroup RelationsOral TraditionsImmigration And Integration In EuropeAcculturation StressIntercultural CompetenceLanguage politics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved