Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 30 – uploaded by Zaki Uz Zaman

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Note: Figure in () indicate sample no. and average salary of the corresponding staff & figure within [ ] indicate average number of employee. No. of staffs are shown in aggregate Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000 ble 4.18. Number of Permanent Staffs Work in the Mill and their Average Salary (Taka/month)

Table 30 Note: Figure in () indicate sample no. and average salary of the corresponding staff & figure within [ ] indicate average number of employee. No. of staffs are shown in aggregate Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000 ble 4.18. Number of Permanent Staffs Work in the Mill and their Average Salary (Taka/month)

Related Figures (54)

* The paper is the part of the doctoral thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University(2002) Laboratry of Agricultural Marketing, Graduate School of Agriculture,
* The paper is the part of the doctoral thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University(2002) Laboratry of Agricultural Marketing, Graduate School of Agriculture,
Note: i) Net production is calculated by deducting 10% from the total productio1 ii) PFDS= Public Food Distribution System iii) % of Public import data were calculated from Dorosh (2000) Source : Dorosh (2000), FPMU (1999) and Hamid (1990) Table 2.1. Rice Production and Availability in Bangladesh
Note: i) Net production is calculated by deducting 10% from the total productio1 ii) PFDS= Public Food Distribution System iii) % of Public import data were calculated from Dorosh (2000) Source : Dorosh (2000), FPMU (1999) and Hamid (1990) Table 2.1. Rice Production and Availability in Bangladesh
Source: Production and Procurement data were taken from Hamid 1990, Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, Homepage of Ministry of Food 2000 Table 2.2. Procurement of Aman and Boro Rice from 1977/78 to 1999/00
Source: Production and Procurement data were taken from Hamid 1990, Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, Homepage of Ministry of Food 2000 Table 2.2. Procurement of Aman and Boro Rice from 1977/78 to 1999/00
Note: i) 1 quintal = 100 kg, ii) market price of 1998/99 and 1999/00 are average price of 3 districts, taken from Jaim (2001) iii) 1 US $ = 58 Taka. Source: Support Price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999 and BBS 1999 Data of market price were taken from DAM, and Jaim 2001 Table 2.3. Relationship between Support price and Market Price of Rice (Taka/quintal)
Note: i) 1 quintal = 100 kg, ii) market price of 1998/99 and 1999/00 are average price of 3 districts, taken from Jaim (2001) iii) 1 US $ = 58 Taka. Source: Support Price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999 and BBS 1999 Data of market price were taken from DAM, and Jaim 2001 Table 2.3. Relationship between Support price and Market Price of Rice (Taka/quintal)
Note: Data of 1998/99 and 1999/00 was estimated from Jaim (2001). It is the average data of 3 districts of Bangladesh Source: Support price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, and Growers Income (growers price) were taken from DAM and Jaim 2001 Table 2.4. Income (Taka) of Growers from Aman Rice Production,
Note: Data of 1998/99 and 1999/00 was estimated from Jaim (2001). It is the average data of 3 districts of Bangladesh Source: Support price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, and Growers Income (growers price) were taken from DAM and Jaim 2001 Table 2.4. Income (Taka) of Growers from Aman Rice Production,
Note: Data of 1998/99 and 1999/00 was estimated from Jaim (2001). It is the average data of 3 districts of Bangladesh Source: Support price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, and Growers Income (growers price) were taken from DAM and Jaim 2001. Table 2.5. Income of Growers from Boro Rice Production
Note: Data of 1998/99 and 1999/00 was estimated from Jaim (2001). It is the average data of 3 districts of Bangladesh Source: Support price data were taken from Begum 1997, FPMU 1999, and Growers Income (growers price) were taken from DAM and Jaim 2001. Table 2.5. Income of Growers from Boro Rice Production
Source: Cost of rice procurement is estimated from procurement volume and procurement cost impor cost and subsidy of food are taken from FPMU, 1999. Table 2.6. Cost of Rice Distrbution in the Public Sector
Source: Cost of rice procurement is estimated from procurement volume and procurement cost impor cost and subsidy of food are taken from FPMU, 1999. Table 2.6. Cost of Rice Distrbution in the Public Sector
Figure 3.2. Seasonality of Rice Price in Bangladesh (estimated by 12-months moving average method) Source: Calculated from various issues of Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
Figure 3.2. Seasonality of Rice Price in Bangladesh (estimated by 12-months moving average method) Source: Calculated from various issues of Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
Figure 3.3. Seasonal Variation of HYV Paddy and Coarse Milled Rice (Wholesale and Retail) Prices in Bangladesh for the Year 1989/90 to 1999/00 Source: Calculated from various issues Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
Figure 3.3. Seasonal Variation of HYV Paddy and Coarse Milled Rice (Wholesale and Retail) Prices in Bangladesh for the Year 1989/90 to 1999/00 Source: Calculated from various issues Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
> 3.1. Seasonal Price Range of Paddy and Rice from 1989/90 to 1999/00 Note; N/A=Not available. Source: Calculated from raw data those collected from issues of Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
> 3.1. Seasonal Price Range of Paddy and Rice from 1989/90 to 1999/00 Note; N/A=Not available. Source: Calculated from raw data those collected from issues of Monthly Statistical Bulletin.
Note: i) G=Gain L=Loss; ii) 12= Dec. 1 Jan 2 Feb 3=Mar 5= May 7=Jul 9=Sept 10=Oct Source: Calculated from data of Begum and formula provided in the text. Table 3.3. Chances of Gain and Loss of Farmers if they Can Store Paddy
Note: i) G=Gain L=Loss; ii) 12= Dec. 1 Jan 2 Feb 3=Mar 5= May 7=Jul 9=Sept 10=Oct Source: Calculated from data of Begum and formula provided in the text. Table 3.3. Chances of Gain and Loss of Farmers if they Can Store Paddy
Table 3.4. Chances of Gain and Loss of Wholesalers if they Store Rice
Table 3.4. Chances of Gain and Loss of Wholesalers if they Store Rice
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.4. Cropping Pattern of the Respondents
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.4. Cropping Pattern of the Respondents
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.2. Distribution of Land Area of the Respondents
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.2. Distribution of Land Area of the Respondents
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.1. Frequency Distribution of Family Size of the Respondents
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.1. Frequency Distribution of Family Size of the Respondents
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. ‘able 4.3. Operating Status of the Respondents in the Surveyed Area
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. ‘able 4.3. Operating Status of the Respondents in the Surveyed Area
Table 4.5. Production and Yield of Aman and Boro Crops in the Surveyed Areas Source: Field Survey February-March 2000.
Table 4.5. Production and Yield of Aman and Boro Crops in the Surveyed Areas Source: Field Survey February-March 2000.
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.6. Average Sell (ton) by the Respondents in different Time
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.6. Average Sell (ton) by the Respondents in different Time
Figure 4.1. Disposal Pattern of Aman Source: Field Survev. Februarv-March 2000
Figure 4.1. Disposal Pattern of Aman Source: Field Survev. Februarv-March 2000
Figure 4.2. Disposal Pattern of Boro Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000
Figure 4.2. Disposal Pattern of Boro Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.7. Selling Price of Paddy by Variety Received by the Growers (Tk/ton
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.7. Selling Price of Paddy by Variety Received by the Growers (Tk/ton
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.8. Reasons for Bulk Selling
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.8. Reasons for Bulk Selling
ote: i) *I'wo respondents took loan 80 and 120 kilogram of Paddy from a village mahajan during October. For which they have to repayed cash against paddy. Each Kg price of paddy was Taka 8.81 inthe open market. But they have to repayed @ Taka 12.5 for each kg of paddy. So they paid 42% for taking paddy as loan. ii): Figure within ( ) indicate percentages of respondents re-purchased and figures within [ ] indicate percentages of quantity re-purchased. ource: Field survev Fehruarv-March 2000. lable 4.9. Average Repurchase of Paddy and Price Paid by the Respondents by Month
ote: i) *I'wo respondents took loan 80 and 120 kilogram of Paddy from a village mahajan during October. For which they have to repayed cash against paddy. Each Kg price of paddy was Taka 8.81 inthe open market. But they have to repayed @ Taka 12.5 for each kg of paddy. So they paid 42% for taking paddy as loan. ii): Figure within ( ) indicate percentages of respondents re-purchased and figures within [ ] indicate percentages of quantity re-purchased. ource: Field survev Fehruarv-March 2000. lable 4.9. Average Repurchase of Paddy and Price Paid by the Respondents by Month
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.10. Selling Price versus Re-purchase Price
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.10. Selling Price versus Re-purchase Price
Table 4.11. Paddy Sell from Home and in the Market by the Respon- dents (%) Source: Field Survey February-March 2000.
Table 4.11. Paddy Sell from Home and in the Market by the Respon- dents (%) Source: Field Survey February-March 2000.
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.12. Percentage of Respondents Sold Paddy to the Intermediaries and Government Center
Source: Field Survey February-March 2000. Table 4.12. Percentage of Respondents Sold Paddy to the Intermediaries and Government Center
area, formal credit was the main source Note: Growers belong to small and medium type have accepted informal credit Their land area range from 0.40 to 1.62 hectare. 80% of them are small and 20% are medium type growers. Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000.
area, formal credit was the main source Note: Growers belong to small and medium type have accepted informal credit Their land area range from 0.40 to 1.62 hectare. 80% of them are small and 20% are medium type growers. Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000.
‘able 4.14. Average Loan (Taka) taken by the Respondents and Annual Interest Rate of Loan Note: Figures within parentheses indicate annual interest rate of loan. Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000.
‘able 4.14. Average Loan (Taka) taken by the Respondents and Annual Interest Rate of Loan Note: Figures within parentheses indicate annual interest rate of loan. Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000.
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.15. Sources of Supply of Paddy to Rice Mills (%) Rice millers in the Sherpur area are the most significant members of the marketing system. In fact, they play a vital role in paddy purchasing and selling operations. They buy paddy either directly or through their agents in the markets. In our case, we found that all the millers bought paddy through the aratdar, a commission agent, who has a permanent business shop in the upazila market. These commission agents get capital in advance from the millers for supplying paddy to the mills. The amount of money varies from mill to mill. Aratdars supply paddy to the mill within 7-15 days of receiving money. How much paddy will be purchased and at what price is the decision of the millers and is controlled by them, avatdars have little freedom in these matters.
Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000. Table 4.15. Sources of Supply of Paddy to Rice Mills (%) Rice millers in the Sherpur area are the most significant members of the marketing system. In fact, they play a vital role in paddy purchasing and selling operations. They buy paddy either directly or through their agents in the markets. In our case, we found that all the millers bought paddy through the aratdar, a commission agent, who has a permanent business shop in the upazila market. These commission agents get capital in advance from the millers for supplying paddy to the mills. The amount of money varies from mill to mill. Aratdars supply paddy to the mill within 7-15 days of receiving money. How much paddy will be purchased and at what price is the decision of the millers and is controlled by them, avatdars have little freedom in these matters.
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages. Source: Field Survey February-March, 2000. Table 4.16. Milling Outturn and By-products Generation by Mill Types for 40 Kg of Paddy
Note: Figures within parentheses indicate percentages. Source: Field Survey February-March, 2000. Table 4.16. Milling Outturn and By-products Generation by Mill Types for 40 Kg of Paddy
The level of employment provided by this industry is an important indicator Figure 4.4. Paddy Procured by the Rice Millers in the Study Areas Souece: Field Survey, February-March,
The level of employment provided by this industry is an important indicator Figure 4.4. Paddy Procured by the Rice Millers in the Study Areas Souece: Field Survey, February-March,
Figure 4.5. Monthly Transaction of Paddy and Rice by the Rice Millers Souece: Field Survey, February-March, Table 4.17. Number of Labors Working in the Rice Mills in a Day and their Average Wage Rate (Taka/day)
Figure 4.5. Monthly Transaction of Paddy and Rice by the Rice Millers Souece: Field Survey, February-March, Table 4.17. Number of Labors Working in the Rice Mills in a Day and their Average Wage Rate (Taka/day)
Note: Figure within () indicate sample no & figure within [ ] indicate percentages. Labor no. are shown in aggregate and wage in average Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000
Note: Figure within () indicate sample no & figure within [ ] indicate percentages. Labor no. are shown in aggregate and wage in average Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000
Note: No. of employed labor & annual income are calculated by assuming that a mill is operated 270 days a year. * income of a labor for 270 days. : a . : Figures within () indicate sample no. & percentage & figures within [ ] indicate income in US $. 1 US $=Taka 54.0 Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000 Table 4.19. Annualy Employed daily Labor (no.) in the Rice Mills by Sex and their Average Income (Taka)
Note: No. of employed labor & annual income are calculated by assuming that a mill is operated 270 days a year. * income of a labor for 270 days. : a . : Figures within () indicate sample no. & percentage & figures within [ ] indicate income in US $. 1 US $=Taka 54.0 Source: Field Survey, February-March 2000 Table 4.19. Annualy Employed daily Labor (no.) in the Rice Mills by Sex and their Average Income (Taka)
Figure 4.6. Monthly Transaction of Rice by the Rice Wholesaler cum Aratdar in Bangladesh Source: Field Survey, February-March,
Figure 4.6. Monthly Transaction of Rice by the Rice Wholesaler cum Aratdar in Bangladesh Source: Field Survey, February-March,
Figure 4.7. Average Transaction of Rice by the Wholesaler-cum-Aratdars in Bangladesh Note: W1, W2, W3.....= Wholesalers Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2002.
Figure 4.7. Average Transaction of Rice by the Wholesaler-cum-Aratdars in Bangladesh Note: W1, W2, W3.....= Wholesalers Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2002.
Note: indicates not available. Source: DAM(1997), Handbook of Agricultural Statistics(1999). Table 5.2. Grower’s Share and Marketing Margin of Retail Rice Price(Boro)
Note: indicates not available. Source: DAM(1997), Handbook of Agricultural Statistics(1999). Table 5.2. Grower’s Share and Marketing Margin of Retail Rice Price(Boro)
Source: Field Survey, February-Mrach, 2000.
Source: Field Survey, February-Mrach, 2000.
Table 5.4. Growers Costs for Aman and Boro Production (per household) Source: Calculated from the data of Field Survey and FPMU (1999).
Table 5.4. Growers Costs for Aman and Boro Production (per household) Source: Calculated from the data of Field Survey and FPMU (1999).
Note: APS= Average Selling Price of Paddy Received by the Respondents during the Field Survey. Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.5. Gross Income of Growers from Aman and Boro (per household)
Note: APS= Average Selling Price of Paddy Received by the Respondents during the Field Survey. Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.5. Gross Income of Growers from Aman and Boro (per household)
Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.6. Other Costs Incurred by the Growers (per household)
Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.6. Other Costs Incurred by the Growers (per household)
Source: Calculated from Table 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6. Table 5.7. Net Income of Growers from Aman and Boro Paddy (per household)
Source: Calculated from Table 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6. Table 5.7. Net Income of Growers from Aman and Boro Paddy (per household)
Note: **BR 3, BR-28 and BR-26 are the name of varieties those cultivated in boro and aus season. Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.8. Average Costs, Break-even Selling Price, and Margin Obtained by All the Sample Small Millers from 1 Kg of Paddy & Rice by Variety
Note: **BR 3, BR-28 and BR-26 are the name of varieties those cultivated in boro and aus season. Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.8. Average Costs, Break-even Selling Price, and Margin Obtained by All the Sample Small Millers from 1 Kg of Paddy & Rice by Variety
Sourse: Transaction was estimated from Figure 4.7 and Profit margin was estimated from Table 5.8. Table 5.9. Monthly Income of Rice Millers in the Study Area
Sourse: Transaction was estimated from Figure 4.7 and Profit margin was estimated from Table 5.8. Table 5.9. Monthly Income of Rice Millers in the Study Area
Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.10. Average Costs (per ton) of Wholesaler-cum-Avatdar in Bangladesh
Source: Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.10. Average Costs (per ton) of Wholesaler-cum-Avatdar in Bangladesh
Note: Figure within parentheses indicate rante. Source: Table 5.10 and Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.11. Return of Wholesale-cum-Aratdar in Bangladesh
Note: Figure within parentheses indicate rante. Source: Table 5.10 and Field Survey, February-March, 2000. Table 5.11. Return of Wholesale-cum-Aratdar in Bangladesh
Source: Calculated from Table 5.10, and monthly transaction obtained from wholesaler cum aratdar during th interview. Table 5.12. Monthly Costs and Returns of a Wholesaler-cum-A ratdar
Source: Calculated from Table 5.10, and monthly transaction obtained from wholesaler cum aratdar during th interview. Table 5.12. Monthly Costs and Returns of a Wholesaler-cum-A ratdar
A Study on Rice Marketing System and Price Policy in Bangladesh
A Study on Rice Marketing System and Price Policy in Bangladesh
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved