Academia.eduAcademia.edu

with increasing doping levels, which further contributes to the increase in Seebeck coefficient, as shown in Fig. 6. This is different from our previous study, in which the alkaline earth metal doping ((BiS); 2(Tio.9sMgo.05S2)2,  (Bio9Cao18)1.2(TiS2). and (Bio.9Sro.1S)1.2(TiS2)2) decreased the effective mass. It is believed that pure (BiS); 2(TiS2)2 has a non-parabolic band structure, so the decrease in carrier concentration can reduce the effective mass [22,23]. In the case of chromium doping, however, the effective mass increases as the decreasing of the carrier concentration, which may be due to the formation of additional states near Fermi level. Further investigation is needed to prove this assumption.

Figure 6 with increasing doping levels, which further contributes to the increase in Seebeck coefficient, as shown in Fig. 6. This is different from our previous study, in which the alkaline earth metal doping ((BiS); 2(Tio.9sMgo.05S2)2, (Bio9Cao18)1.2(TiS2). and (Bio.9Sro.1S)1.2(TiS2)2) decreased the effective mass. It is believed that pure (BiS); 2(TiS2)2 has a non-parabolic band structure, so the decrease in carrier concentration can reduce the effective mass [22,23]. In the case of chromium doping, however, the effective mass increases as the decreasing of the carrier concentration, which may be due to the formation of additional states near Fermi level. Further investigation is needed to prove this assumption.