Figure 8 Performance of the optimised combined cycle with the dual-objective solution obtained Figure 8 shows the solution selected by MIDACO according to which the temperature of th
Related Figures (9)
Figure 1. Schematic and 7-s diagrams for the combined TRFC-ORC cycle condensing fluid of the TFC circuit until it becomes saturated vapour. Yari et al. (2015) developed their model by using the EES software and analysed the cycle’s Figure 2. The Excel-aided model for the ORC with the data given by Yari et al. (2015) Table 1. Values of the parameters used for validating the ORC model (Yari et al., 2015) Figure 3. Comparison of (a) the estimations for the present model for the system’s power at Figure 4. Comparison of (a) the estimations for the present model for the thermal and exergetic various values of T3 with (b) those obtained by Yari et al. (2015) discussed in the following section. Figure 5. Excel-aided model for the combined cycle using R152a Figure 6. Variation of the combined-cycle’s power and thermal and exergetic efficiencies with Figure 7. MIDACO’s set-up for the dual-objective optimisation of the combined cycle to four changing variables to be considered. The set-up for MIDACO is shown on Figure 7 conducted by using the free version of the MIDACO solver (Schlueter et al., 2012) that allows up Table 2. Comparison of the thermodynamic performance of the optimised combined cycle REFERENCES