Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 19 – uploaded by Tanapong Rukdeechuai

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure17 Comparison between maximum predicted Ground (prediction by different soil models and observed data) surface settlement by different soil models and observation of

Figure17 17 Comparison between maximum predicted Ground (prediction by different soil models and observed data) surface settlement by different soil models and observation of

Related Figures (20)

Figure 1 Characteristic stiffness-strain behavior of soil with typical strain ranges for laboratory tests and structure [2]. predictions of soil displacements is highlighted.
Figure 1 Characteristic stiffness-strain behavior of soil with typical strain ranges for laboratory tests and structure [2]. predictions of soil displacements is highlighted.
Figure 2 The Mohr-Coulomb yield surface in principal stress principal stress is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 The Mohr-Coulomb yield surface in principal stress principal stress is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 3 Description of typical Bangkok subsoil soil profile
Figure 3 Description of typical Bangkok subsoil soil profile
transit projects [9] adopted in this study. of lateral earth pressure of Bangkok soils from previous mass
transit projects [9] adopted in this study. of lateral earth pressure of Bangkok soils from previous mass
Figure 5 Coefficient of earth pressure for Bangkok clay, first Figure 4 Shear Strength of Bangkok soft clay and first stiff stiff clay, and Bangkok aquifer sand [9]
Figure 5 Coefficient of earth pressure for Bangkok clay, first Figure 4 Shear Strength of Bangkok soft clay and first stiff stiff clay, and Bangkok aquifer sand [9]
Table 1 MC soil model parameters
Table 1 MC soil model parameters
Table 2 HS and HSsmall soil model parameters Figure 6 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€,) (Figure a) and
Table 2 HS and HSsmall soil model parameters Figure 6 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€,) (Figure a) and
Figure 7 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€.) (Figure a) and
Figure 7 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€.) (Figure a) and
Table 3 location of bored piles data of Bangkok soft clay 4.2 Deep excavation
Table 3 location of bored piles data of Bangkok soft clay 4.2 Deep excavation
Figure 8 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€,) (Figure a) and Volumetric strain-shear strain (€ -E€_) (Figure b) for extension
Figure 8 Deviator stress-shear strain (q-€,) (Figure a) and Volumetric strain-shear strain (€ -E€_) (Figure b) for extension
Figure 9 Finite element mesh of Krungdhon Hospital project
Figure 9 Finite element mesh of Krungdhon Hospital project
different soil models compared to measurement data of
different soil models compared to measurement data of
Figure 11 Comparison between predicted maximum pile Krungdhon Hospital project
Figure 11 Comparison between predicted maximum pile Krungdhon Hospital project
Figure 12 Finite element mesh of BMAH case study
Figure 12 Finite element mesh of BMAH case study
Figure 13 Horizontal wall displacements from analyses with
Figure 13 Horizontal wall displacements from analyses with
Figure 14 Comparison between predicted maximum predicted.
Figure 14 Comparison between predicted maximum predicted.
Figure 15 Finite element mesh of MRTA point CS-8E case under-predict for all observed data.
Figure 15 Finite element mesh of MRTA point CS-8E case under-predict for all observed data.
study Figure 16 Ground surface settlement in CS-8E point
study Figure 16 Ground surface settlement in CS-8E point
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved