Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Fig. 4. (a) Comparisons of cutters by force and (b) Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) vs area of cut. They show greater efficiency with the CAT configuration than the conventional or shaped cutter alone. In these graphs, PDC, TRI and CAT stand for conventional, shaped and conventional cutter after shaped cutter respectively.  yield variations in section area, and force is a function of section area and rock hardness. The data compares a conventional PDC at 20° back rake vs the shaped cutter at 40°. With the shaped cutter, cutting force is not affected by back rake; this is not the case with a conventional cutter, which has a higher cutting force at 40° back rake than at 20°. A cutting force reduction is seen when the conventional cutter follows the rock-weakening action of the shaped cutter (CAT). The graphs shown in Figure 4(b) present the respective change in the MSE. Again, the CAT cutter configuration has a lower MSE, indicating a more efficient cutting process.  v

Figure 4 (a) Comparisons of cutters by force and (b) Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) vs area of cut. They show greater efficiency with the CAT configuration than the conventional or shaped cutter alone. In these graphs, PDC, TRI and CAT stand for conventional, shaped and conventional cutter after shaped cutter respectively. yield variations in section area, and force is a function of section area and rock hardness. The data compares a conventional PDC at 20° back rake vs the shaped cutter at 40°. With the shaped cutter, cutting force is not affected by back rake; this is not the case with a conventional cutter, which has a higher cutting force at 40° back rake than at 20°. A cutting force reduction is seen when the conventional cutter follows the rock-weakening action of the shaped cutter (CAT). The graphs shown in Figure 4(b) present the respective change in the MSE. Again, the CAT cutter configuration has a lower MSE, indicating a more efficient cutting process. v