Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Theodore Rappaport

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 6: Total path loss at 140 GHz (0° elevation angle) without antenna gains including free space path loss (FSPL), rain attenuation, and atmo- spheric absorption on a terrestrial path using models in [15].

Figure 6 Total path loss at 140 GHz (0° elevation angle) without antenna gains including free space path loss (FSPL), rain attenuation, and atmo- spheric absorption on a terrestrial path using models in [15].

Related Figures (7)

Fig. 1: Key ITU spectrum allocation above 100 GHz with RR5.340 prohibited bands, unlicensed/EESS/RAS sharing bands, and coprimary fixed/mobile bands, from Millimeter Wave Coalition. NYU WIRELESS, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, {ychou, tsr} @nyu.edu Yunchou Xing, and Theodore S. Rappaport
Fig. 1: Key ITU spectrum allocation above 100 GHz with RR5.340 prohibited bands, unlicensed/EESS/RAS sharing bands, and coprimary fixed/mobile bands, from Millimeter Wave Coalition. NYU WIRELESS, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, {ychou, tsr} @nyu.edu Yunchou Xing, and Theodore S. Rappaport
Fig. 2: Atmospheric absorption beyond Friis free space path loss [17] at z = 0 km height (sea level) and z= 10 km height (10 km above the sea level), computed from models in [15].
Fig. 2: Atmospheric absorption beyond Friis free space path loss [17] at z = 0 km height (sea level) and z= 10 km height (10 km above the sea level), computed from models in [15].
Fig. 4: Total path loss from ground terminals to satellite NGSO EESS altitudes (without antenna gains included) computed from models in [15], [23]. Fig. 3: Rain attenuation beyond natural Friis free space loss in dB/km over frequency at various rainfall rates using ITU models [15], [18], [19].
Fig. 4: Total path loss from ground terminals to satellite NGSO EESS altitudes (without antenna gains included) computed from models in [15], [23]. Fig. 3: Rain attenuation beyond natural Friis free space loss in dB/km over frequency at various rainfall rates using ITU models [15], [18], [19].
Fig. 5: Satellite and Terrestrial networks, illustrating the interference between weather satellites (passive) and terristrial communication (active) systems.
Fig. 5: Satellite and Terrestrial networks, illustrating the interference between weather satellites (passive) and terristrial communication (active) systems.
Fig. 8: The rooftop base station (38.2 m above the ground) received power vs. different distances and different elevation angles form ground users (1.5 m above the ground) at 142 GHz. Fig. 7: Rooftop surrogate satellite measurement campaign. The surrogate satellite (and backhaul) receiver RX location is at 38.2 m above the ground on the rooftop identified as a yellow star. Ten mobile TX locations on the ground are identified as purple circles. The LOS elevation pointing angles from TX1-8 to the RX location are 80° to 15°, respectively.
Fig. 8: The rooftop base station (38.2 m above the ground) received power vs. different distances and different elevation angles form ground users (1.5 m above the ground) at 142 GHz. Fig. 7: Rooftop surrogate satellite measurement campaign. The surrogate satellite (and backhaul) receiver RX location is at 38.2 m above the ground on the rooftop identified as a yellow star. Ten mobile TX locations on the ground are identified as purple circles. The LOS elevation pointing angles from TX1-8 to the RX location are 80° to 15°, respectively.
Related topics:
Computer ScienceSatellite Communications
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved