Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Ashok Kumar

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Study I; Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying Experiences of the Last Month Note. Means not sharing subscripts are significantly different from each other at p = .01. Means could range from 1.00 to 5.00.

Table 2 Study I; Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying Experiences of the Last Month Note. Means not sharing subscripts are significantly different from each other at p = .01. Means could range from 1.00 to 5.00.

Related Figures (6)

Study 1: Need-Satisfaction Items With Factor Loadings Greater Than .45 Table 1
Study 1: Need-Satisfaction Items With Factor Loadings Greater Than .45 Table 1
Study 1: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect
Study 1: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect
Study 2: Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying Experiences of the Last Week, by Sample Note. Means within columns not sharing subscripts are significantly dif- ferent from each other at p < .01. The fifth column tests the differences between the means of the two samples. ty < 05. **p < .O1.
Study 2: Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying Experiences of the Last Week, by Sample Note. Means within columns not sharing subscripts are significantly dif- ferent from each other at p < .01. The fifth column tests the differences between the means of the two samples. ty < 05. **p < .O1.
Study 2: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect, by Sample Table 5
Study 2: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect, by Sample Table 5
Note. Means within columns not sharing subscripts are significantly dif- ferent from each other at p = .01. Study 3: Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying and Most Unsatisfying Experiences of the Semester
Note. Means within columns not sharing subscripts are significantly dif- ferent from each other at p = .01. Study 3: Mean Salience of Each Candidate Need Within Participants’ Most Satisfying and Most Unsatisfying Experiences of the Semester
Study 3: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect, Separately for Satisfying and Unsatisfying Events Table 7
Study 3: Correlations of Candidate Needs With Event-Related Affect, Separately for Satisfying and Unsatisfying Events Table 7
Related topics:
MarketingPsychologyCognitive ScienceCross-Cultural ComparisonSelf Determination TheoryPsychological TheoryPersonal Satisfaction
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved