Figure 1. Surface distribution of outlined megasequences in Is- tria (Veli¢ et al. 1995). Figure 2. Marl exposure at Paz site. Table 1. Sites and sample description. Figure 3. Soil sample in natural state. Figure 4. Range of grain size distribution curves. bution curves are related to the natural condition ot! soil samples prior to compaction test. The testec samples were classified as GW to SC material ac- cording to the USCS. Table 2. Compaction parameters. *the closeness of approach of a measurement to the true valu of the quantity measured ** the smallest division on the instrument readout scale Table 3. Pressure/volume controller’s technical specification. Figure 5. Compaction curves using the standard Proctor energy Figure 5 shows the compaction curves for th tested specimens. Figure 7. Rowe & Barden hydraulic oedometer cell and air/water pressure cell. Figure 6. Advanced pressure/volume controllers. Figure 8. Pressure vs. time plot. The steady state was reached when the volume change-time plots for both controllers reached the same slope. A constant pressure value within each controller was a further evidence that the steady state condition has been reached. Table 4. Permeability tests.
