Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 11 – uploaded by Fadli Akbar

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
FIGURE 10. A comparison between the result of the proposed technique with the actual defects’ size and location of the GFRP sample.

Figure 10 A comparison between the result of the proposed technique with the actual defects’ size and location of the GFRP sample.

Related Figures (10)

FIGURE 2. GFRP sample illustrates the defects’ size and location.
FIGURE 2. GFRP sample illustrates the defects’ size and location.
FIGURE 3. The setup diagram of the microwave NDT system.
FIGURE 3. The setup diagram of the microwave NDT system.
FIGURE 4. Illustration of the utilized instruments for defect detection in GFRP sample.
FIGURE 4. Illustration of the utilized instruments for defect detection in GFRP sample.
FIGURE 5. The initial centroids of the defect and defect-free sources.
FIGURE 5. The initial centroids of the defect and defect-free sources.
FIGURE 8. The clustering result of GFRP sample using the proposed technique.
FIGURE 8. The clustering result of GFRP sample using the proposed technique.
FIGURE 9. The imaging results of GFRP using TDR in [19] (a), and correlation technique in [18].
FIGURE 9. The imaging results of GFRP using TDR in [19] (a), and correlation technique in [18].
Related topics:
Computer ScienceMaterials ScienceMicrowave Imaging
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved