Figure 2 – uploaded by Paul Priest

See full PDF downloadDownload figure

Figure 3 Project structure (Author)

Related Figures (58)

Preface.

Chapter 2 - Contemporary Context: Tackling Modern Slavery in Construction Supply Chains__

Bibliography

Construction in the UK harbours practices of modern slavery, and is increasingly likely to suffer from such risk in the

labour in construction projects.

Figure 9 An inter-business construction project supply chain (adapted from Harland (1996: s67) (Pryke, 2009, p. 4))

labour (Gaur and Vazquez-Brust, 2019, p. 142). A conceptual diagram of this arrangement is shown in Figure 10.

Figure 14 Complex construction supply chain organizational structure - multiple projects (O’Brien et al., 2008, p. 299 projects, as illustrated in Figure 14.

Figure 15 Procurement guidance for combatting modern slavery, adapted from Supply Chain Sustainability School (2016) (Trautrims et al., 2020, p. 286)

Figure 16 Diagram of due diligence in modern slavery policy for RIBA Members (Author and Richard Priest,

regulatory environment enabled further analysis. ed to create a profile of the Member demographic. In situating these legal jurisdictions, a profile of the

The frequency distribution (59.4% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.65) indicate that respondents

The frequency distribution (64.3% agree, strongly agree) and mean value (M=3.78) indicate that respondents are

The frequency distribution (39.4% agree, strongly agree) and mean value (M=3.33) indicate that respondents are

The frequency distribution (23.5% agree, strongly agree) and mean value (M=2.81) indicate dissatisfaction with the

The frequency distribution (59.1%) indicates that most respondents have received no training in implementing

The frequency distribution (36.5% disagree, strongly disagree) and the mean value (M=2.8) indicate that

The frequency distribution (37.9% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.04) indicate that respondents

The frequency distribution (27.2% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.04) indicate that respondent:

The frequency distribution (46.8% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.63) indicate that respondents

The frequency distribution (28.9% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=2.91) indicate that respondent:

The frequency distribution (36.2% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.32) indicate that respondent:

The frequency distribution (49.2% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.58) indicate that respondent:

The frequency distribution (29.0% agree, strongly agree) and the mean value (M=3.20) indicate that respondent:

The frequency distribution (48.5% disagree, strongly disagree) and the mean value (M=2.37) indicate that

Of 826 respondents, 620 (75.1%) responded to this question, whilst 206 (24.6%) did not respond. Of the 62¢

Survey Question 25. In what country is the company that employs you based? Employed (including furloughed), 25 (3.0%) retired, 5 (0.6%) not employed and 14 (1.7%) stated other. Of the 605 respondents, 389 (47.1%) stated Employed (including furloughed), followed by 172 (20.8%) Self-

Survey Question 29. What is the size of the company? Partnership (LLP), 16 (1.9%) Unlimited Partnership, and 15 (1.8%) stated Employee Owned.

Survey Question 31. Is the company a RIBA Chartered Practice? that they were required.

and only 1 (0.1%) stated RIBA Student Membership.

Figure 20 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 1, (Author) Do you remember when you were first aware of the idea of ‘modern slavery’ in architecture? Code A: Awareness of the Concept of Modern Slavery 7.2.4.1 Interview Question 1 Most participants stated that they are aware of the concept of modern slavery in architecture, while very few stated

Modern slavery has been described as the biggest human rights issue of our time. It affects individuals throughout the construction supply chain across the globe, from extraction to completion. In this context, who do you think should be responsible for protecting the rights of the individual? Organisations or individuals? Governments or practices? Figure 21 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 2, (Author) Code A: Shared Responsibility 7.2.4.2 Interview Question 2

Figure 22 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 3, (Author) 7.2.4.3 Interview Question 3 “I'd feel it was probably quite difficult to trace [social responsibility in project supply chains, as] once you get to

Figure 23 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 4 (Author) 7.2.4.1 Interview Question 4 » “TI]t's very easy for a country to sign up to international code, and then that filters down as well. But it shouldn't

Figure 24 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 5, (Author) 7.2.4.2 Interview Question 5

Figure 25 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 6, (Author) 7.2.4.3 Interview Question 6 “Most larger contractors are a member of contracting organizations, so they probably already have guidance and

Figure 26 Interview Analysis - Codes extracted from Interview Question 7, (Author) How might these processes be improved? 7.2.4.4 Interview Question 7

Figure 27 Use of data from Interview Questions to inform the response to Sub-Research Question C (Author)

Figure 28 Member's feelings of preparedness to comply with their Code of Professional Conduct, (Author) In summary, Figure 28 below provides a simple overview of Member’s feelings of preparedness to comply with their Code.

Figure 29 Use of data from Interview Questions to inform the response to Sub-Research Question D (Author) Using the same process as the previous section, | use the data produced in Chapter 7.2.3 to identify the emerging

In summary, Figure 30 below provides a simple overview of how Members might effectively manage the risk of modern slavery in their project supply chains. Figure 30 How Members might effectively manage the risk of modern slavery in their project supply chains, (Author

format is multiple choice, and respondents were allowed to choose more than one option.