Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Dennis Eggett

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Statistical analysis was done using Generalized Linear Model. Each student’s recommendation was adjusted for calorie level (or age, for milk group). Significant difference between meal plan participants and nonparticipants, P<.05. ‘Significant interaction between plan participation and sex, P<.05. Significant sex difference, P<.05. Table 2. Mean difference and standard error (SE) between actual and recommended numbers of servings from each food group, by meal plan and by sex for college students*

Table 2 Statistical analysis was done using Generalized Linear Model. Each student’s recommendation was adjusted for calorie level (or age, for milk group). Significant difference between meal plan participants and nonparticipants, P<.05. ‘Significant interaction between plan participation and sex, P<.05. Significant sex difference, P<.05. Table 2. Mean difference and standard error (SE) between actual and recommended numbers of servings from each food group, by meal plan and by sex for college students*

Related Figures (1)

Table 1. Number and percentage of college students who met each food group recommendation for their energy intakes* Statistical analysis was done using Generalized Linear Model. *P<.05. **D< 01.
Table 1. Number and percentage of college students who met each food group recommendation for their energy intakes* Statistical analysis was done using Generalized Linear Model. *P<.05. **D< 01.
Related topics:
Food ServicesNutrition Policy
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved