Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Engr Imran Arshad

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 8: Max. Seepage velocity vs. pond levels Selected Section at CH: 48+75

Figure 8 Max. Seepage velocity vs. pond levels Selected Section at CH: 48+75

Related Figures (10)

Comparison of SEEP/W Simulations with Field Observations for Seepage Analysis through an Earthen Dam (Case Study: Hub Dam - Pakistan)
Comparison of SEEP/W Simulations with Field Observations for Seepage Analysis through an Earthen Dam (Case Study: Hub Dam - Pakistan)
Fig. 5: Flownet for Selected Section at CH: 48+75 (Pond level = 346 ft.)
Fig. 5: Flownet for Selected Section at CH: 48+75 (Pond level = 346 ft.)
data sets is 1.067 %. Thus it is found that the performance of the model is good enough
data sets is 1.067 %. Thus it is found that the performance of the model is good enough
Fig. 12: Relationship between observed and simulated hydraulic heads.
Fig. 12: Relationship between observed and simulated hydraulic heads.
Related topics:
Dam - Seepage AnalysisGeographic Information Systems (GIS)
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved