Technology Acceptance Model: Worried about the Cultural Influence?
2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_59Abstract
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has shown in the USA that the Perceived Usefulness (PU) and the Perceived ease-of-use (PEU) determine the intention to use (IU) a specific technology or information system. In this research, the TAM model is validated in Chile, considering the cultural factors of this country, through an application of the model to university students. The results show that the TAM model works in Chile, regardless of the studied technology or the cultural aspects of the country. Finally, new questions arise related to this topic such as the influence of the intensity of use, familiarity with the technology and the individual's reference group for the technologies aimed to encourage communication among people.
FAQs
AI
How does cultural influence affect the Technology Acceptance Model in Chile?
The study reveals that high Power Distance in Chile (63) influences TAM relationships, indicating that authority recommendations may supersede individual PU and PEU factors. Despite this, cultural dimensions were found not to significantly affect TAM model performance across technologies.
What percentage of variance does the Technology Acceptance Model explain in Chile?
The TAM model explains approximately 45% to 76% of variance in user intention across various technologies, outperforming typical historical rates of 40%. Notably, Email recorded the highest R2 at 0.76, while SIGA trailed at 0.37.
What impact does technology familiarity have on TAM relationships?
The results indicate that higher user familiarity significantly boosts the relationship strength between Perceived Ease of Use and Intention to Use. This effect is particularly pronounced in frequently used systems like SGDI, compared to less engaging technologies like SIGA.
How was the effectiveness of the TAM model measured in this research?
Effectiveness was measured through structural equation modeling (SEM), which confirmed causal relations between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Intention to Use. The analysis yielded satisfactory fit indices, validating the overall model structure.
What role does individualism vs collectivism play in technology adoption?
Chile's low Individualism score (23) suggests that collective values influence user patterns, potentially reducing the focus on individual usability. This dynamic implies that users may prioritize technologies that serve group goals, despite lower perceived usability.
References (31)
- Byrne, B.M.: Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. CRC Press (2009)
- Canessa, E., Maldifassi, J., Quezada, A.: Características sociodemográficas y su influencia en el uso de Tecnologías de Información en Chile. Polis (Santiago) 10(30), 365-390 (2011)
- Cook, J., Finlayson, M.: The impact of cultural diversity on web site design. SAM (2005)
- Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of informa- tion technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340 (1989)
- Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research (1975)
- Hwang, Y.: Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic mo- tivation, and the technology acceptance model. European Journal of Information Systems 14(2), 150-161 (2005)
- Hofstede, G.: Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values, vol. 5. Sage (1984)
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, London (1991)
- Hofstede, G.H.: Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage (2001)
- Hofstede, G.: The Hofstede Centre en Cultural Insights -Geert Hofstede (2013), http://geert-hofstede.com/
- Jan, A.U., Contreras, V.: Technology acceptance model for the use of information tech- nology in universities. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 845-851 (2011)
- Kassim, N., Abdullah, N.A.: The effect of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in e-commerce settings: a cross-cultural analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 22(3), 351-371 (2010)
- Kim, S.S., Malhotra, N.K.: A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Science 51(5), 741-755 (2005)
- King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6), 740-755 (2006)
- Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(1), 50 (2003)
- Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A criti- cal review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40(3), 191- 204 (2003)
- Lonner, W.J., Berry, J.W., Hofstede, G.H.: Culture's Consequences: International Differ- ences in Work-Related Values. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship (1980)
- Marcus, A., Gould, E.W.: Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user- interface design. Interactions 7(4), 32-46 (2000)
- McCoy, S., Everard, A., Jones, B.M.: An examination of the technology acceptance model in Uruguay and the US: a focus on culture. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 8(2), 27 (2005)
- McCoy, S.: Integrating national culture into individual IS adoption research: The need for individual level measures (2003)
- McCoy, S., Galletta, D.F., King, W.R.: Applying TAM across cultures: the need for cau- tion. European Journal of Information Systems 16(1), 81-90 (2007)
- Rouibah, K.: Social usage of instant messaging by individuals outside the workplace in Kuwait: a structural equation model. Information Technology & People 21(1), 34-68 (2008)
- Srite, M., Karahanna, E.: The role of espoused national cultural values in technology ac- ceptance. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 679-704 (2006)
- Teo, T.: Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education 52(2), 302-312 (2009)
- Teo, T., Noyes, J.: An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education 57(2), 1645-1653 (2011)
- Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D.: Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 52(5), 463-479 (2010)
- Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204 (2000)
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G.: Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarter- ly, 115-139 (2000)
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478 (2003)
- Voich, D., Macesich, G.: Comparative empirical analysis of cultural values and perceptions of political economy issues. Praeger, Westport (1995)
- Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 16(1), 85-102 (2005)