Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Untripped SUV rollover detection and prevention

2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601)

https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2004.1429677

Abstract

Untripped SUV (Sport Utility Vehicle) rollovers are dangerous and possibly lethal accidents. This thesis address some issues in the detection and prevention of untripped SUV rollovers. Before a rollover can occur, the wheels on one side must lose road contact. The wheel lift off situation is chosen as the critical situation to be avoided. If wheel lift off is prevented, then rollover is prevented as well. A new kinetic energy based measure, that indicates an imminent wheel lift off, is introduced. This measure is used by a gain scheduled LQ (Linear Quadratic) controller to prevent wheel lift off. The LQ controller outputs the desired changes of the forces acting on the chassis. These force changes are mapped to braking and traction system commands by a control allocator. Three different control alloca tion approaches were evaluated, including a new convex optimization approach. The convex optimization approach seems to work well. The controller is capable of preventing wheel lift off in the simulated test cases, and the results are promising.

References (15)

  1. Bibliography
  2. Ackermann, J., Bünte, T. & Odenthal, D. (1999), Advantages of active steering, in 'International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation'.
  3. Bakker, E., Pacejka, H. B. & Lidner, L. (1989), A new tire model with an application in vehicle dynamics studies, Technical Report 890087, SAE, Society of Automotive Engineers.
  4. Best, M. C. & Gordon, T. J. (1998), Real time state estimation of vehicle handling dynamics using an adaptive kalman filter, in 'International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control'.
  5. Boyd, S. & Vandenberghe, L. (2004), Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press.
  6. Dahlberg, E. (2001), Commercial Vehicle Stability Focusing on Rollover, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  7. Forkenbrock, G. J., O'Harra, B. C. & Elsasser, D. (2003), An experimental examination of 26 light vehicles using test maneuvers that may induce on road, untripped rollover and a discussion of NHTSA's refined test procedures, Technical Report DOT HS 809 547, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Research and Test Center, P.O. Box 37, East Liberty, OH 43319, USA.
  8. Gillespie, T. D. (1992), Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, SAE, Society of Automotive Engineers.
  9. Heydinger, G. J., Bixel, R. A., Garrot, W. R., Pyne, M., Howe, J. G. & Guenther, D. A. (1999), Measured Vehicle Inertial Parameters NHTSA's Data Through November 1998, Technical Report 1999 01 1336, SAE, Society of Automotive Engineers.
  10. Howe, J. G., Garrott, W. R., G. Forkenbrock, G. J. H. & Lloyd, J. (2001), An experimental examination of selected maneuvers that may induce on road, untripped light vehicle rollover, Technical Report DOT HS 809 357, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Research and Test Center, P.O. Box 37, East Liberty, OH 43319, USA.
  11. Härkegård, O. (2003), Backstepping and Control Allocation with Applica tions to Flight Control, PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engi neering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Matlab on line documentation (n.d.). http://www.mathworks.com/.
  12. Odenthal, D., Bünte, T. & Ackermann, J. (1999), Nonlinear steering and braking control for vehicle rollover avoidance, in 'Proceedings ECC'99'.
  13. Pacejka, H. B. (2002), Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics, Butterworth Heinemann.
  14. Åström, K. J. & Wittenmark, B. (1995), Adaptive Control, Addison Wesley.
  15. Åström, K. J. & Wittenmark, B. (1997), Computer Controlled Systems, Prentice Hall.