Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS TURBULENCE MODELS FOR NACA 23012 AIRFOIL

2021, Mechanical Testing and Diagnosis

Abstract

This paper compares Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models and evaluates the NACA 23012 airfoil based on these test situations. ANSYS-Fluent version 22.1 was used to compare turbulence models for high-fidelity CFD simulations. A turbulence model should be used to anticipate turbulence's effect on flow. The turbulence model is a set of constitutive equations used to close the flow-governing Navier-Stokes equations. Most engineering turbulence models are based on Boussinesq hypothesis (Spalart-Allmaras, k-ω Standard, k-ω SST, k-ε Standard, k-ε Realizable and k-ε RNG) because it gives a low-cost calculation for solving turbulence viscosity. In this work, three representative turbulence models are used: Spalart-Allmaras, k-ω SST, and k-ε Standard. The flow is investigated at various angles of attack (AoA), from-2° to 18°. These AoA correlate to Re = 3 × 10 6 and Mach number M∞ = 0.13. Simulations are steady-state and incompressible. Flow velocity, pressure, and density are not time dependent. Comparing these CFD scenarios to Abbott's [2] experimental data reveals that these turbulence models offer close results with a 5% error margin for low and medium AoA.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What results do different turbulence models yield for the NACA 23012 airfoil?add

The comparison of turbulence models reveals that the lift coefficients from all models are within 5% of experimental results at low and medium angles of attack, indicating their reliability.

How does tweaking y+ values affect turbulence model accuracy?add

Adjusting y+ from 1 to 100 allows the use of different turbulence models, enhancing the accuracy of the computational flow dynamics.

What computational setups were employed for the NACA 23012 analysis?add

The study utilized ANSYS Fluent 22.1, employing Spalart-Allmaras, k-ω SST, and k-ε Standard turbulence models for a comprehensive analysis.

What method was applied for boundary layer mesh generation?add

The All Triangles Method was used to create unstructured meshes, incorporating inflation layers to accurately model the boundary layer effects.

What explains the observed pressure coefficient differences across angles of attack?add

The results show that higher angles of attack significantly increase the pressure differential between the airfoil's upper and lower surfaces, enhancing lift.

References (7)

  1. *** Airfoil Tools, Online http://airfoiltools.com/. (accessed 23.10.2022)
  2. Abbott I. H., von Doenhoff A. E. (1949). Theory of wing sections. New York : Dover Publications, Inc.
  3. Dănăilă S., Berbente C. (2003) Metode numerice în dinamica fluidelor (in Romanian). Bucharest, Ed. Academiei Române.
  4. Spalart P., Allmaras S. (1992). A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. s.l.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  5. Dănăilă S., Stoia-Djeska M. (2017) Introducere în modelarea turbulenței. București, Ed. Politehnica Press.
  6. Wilcox, D. C. (1998) Turbulence Modeling for CFD. s.l.: Anaheim: DCW Industries.
  7. *** ANSYS Fluent version 22.1. s.l.: ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, 2022.