Spirituality in a Quantum World
2012
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
The Newtonian view of the universe is a vast space filled with real particles called matter. That apple that fell on his head was “real.” In the Newtonian world view, things are separate and real. The universe is a collection of “stuff” that bumps into itself according to laws of motion and gravity. People are also seen as separate from one another as much as a bunch of rocks. In Newton’s world, time is viewed in a linear way, past, present and future all separate though related in causality. This world view is really a scientific description of the “common sense” view of reality that we work in every day. Things and people are separate and they bump and grind on one another. I am being colloquial here because this is not intended to be a lecture on physics per se, but rather an observation on how our world views affect every part of society including religion. (from the Internet)
Related papers
European Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 2021
On several levels there is now a debate whether the concept of God can be made compatible with modern science. In an attempt to elucidate this debate, I give an account of some of my own experiences after writing a book on the foundation of quantum mechanics. In my opinion one can give two independent arguments for the existence of God by taking as departure an epistemic (knowledge-based) interpretation of quantum theory. However, I also argue that any religious belief should be the result of an existential choice governed by each person's own context (history and culture). In particular I give my account of Christianity as a religion connected to our western culture, how one as a scientist can relate to the relevant dogmas.
2015
The neoclassical interpretation of quantum mechanics which re-introduces older conceptual models of gravity and electromagnetism transformed by modern advancements in the field is discussed as a natural outcome from the interchangeability of quantum mechanics and fluid dynamics in light of recent macro-level experiments which show behaviors previously believed to be confined to the quantum world. This superfluid model of mechanics and the known behaviors of superfluids is suggested as a possible substrate and system for the storage and processing of data. Methods of data storage found in natural systems such as the brain are compared via extensive use of analogies to support the conjecture that a rational and mechanical basis for spirituality can be supported under the neoclassical interpretation because of the inherent persistent structure and interaction of the suggested pervasive medium. This model of information theory spiritualism is suggested as a basis for the unification of ...
It should be noted that most of the content accumulated here was derived strictly from Ron Pearson sources. This is my attempt to further what he has started, not to pass of his work as my own. Just fyi :)
Zygon�, 2006
Lothar Schäfer has written a poetic tribute pointing out the relevance of quantum theory to religious beliefs. Two items in his article trouble me greatly. First are the excessive claims about the relevance of quantum mechanisms for the creation and evolution of life. Schäfer's claim that "everything that can happen must happen" can be dangerously misleading. The quantum rules predict that most outcomes have a near-zero chance of occurring. Although "anything can happen" can be a wonderful metaphor for living life, it can be dangerous if taken literally. It can also be misleading when applied to Darwinian mechanisms. My second trouble was with Schäfer's desire to extract moral values from quantum principles in a literalist manner. Extracting ethics from science has always been problematic. Luckily, Schäfer provides balance to these objections by including many wonderful passages that in my opinion correctly point out how quantum theory should change the way we conceive of our place in the universe. I list twelve points in which the quantum ontology differs from our normal Newtonian ontology. Awareness of these aspects is typically missing from our usual appreciation of nature, so Schäfer's poetry on a number of these points is well appreciated.
Thomist, 2001
In a recent article, Wolfgang Smith states that "the ongoing de-Christianization of Western society is due in large measure to the imposition of the prevailing scientistic world view." (1) One need be neither a philosopher nor a scientist to notice that de-Christianization makes its presence felt in every aspect of the life of a citizen in the modern West-familial, professional, cultural, and religious. Thus it opposes the two-and-a-half-millennial tradition that began in ancient Greece and achieved its full development in medieval Christian philosophy. This tradition is one of constant refinement and crystallization, continuously coupled with and catalyzed by the divine plan of salvation of mankind from the bondage of original sin. This complex phenomenon was well encapsulated by Etienne Gilson:
Logoi Pistoi, 2021
The following essay will examine the work of various theologians in the search for an appropriate synthesis of physics and theology. The essay will analyse their various perspectives, their methods, and their interpretation of Scripture in light of new developments in Quantum Mechanics and the quest to locate a conversation point where science and theology intersect. This article will provide an introduction to the history of the quanta, from the first tentative description in the 11th century, to the formal concept of Classical Physics in the 19th century and the discovery of Quantum Physics in the early 20th century. It will also address the concerns of Albert Einstein as relayed to two graduate students who were granted an audience with him in the early 1950s, and how these concerns are related in turn to epistemology as concerns human and trinitarian interactions; and how these interactions alter our conception of them as the disciplines of physics and theology converge.
Cosmos and history: the journal of natural and social philosophy, 2017
This paper attempts a systematic comparison of the multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM). The article ends with a summary table that has 13 rows and 10 columns. The columns are metaphysical principles such as determinism and reality. The rows are the main interpretations from 1925 to the present. Each row has entries such as Yes/No/Agnostic. We have contacted most of the living authors and based on their comments we have modified the entry for their interpretation. However, there is reasonable space for disagreement when it comes to determining the correct value of each box (Yes/No/Agnostic). We hope to improve the table in the future. We have also eliminated one of the columns and replaced it with two new columns. We believe that this topic is especially relevant to bridge building in dialogues on science, religion and spirituality because of the unique way that QM brings out metaphysical questions from within science. While any science may lend itself to metaphysical ...
jirrs.org
Human Cognitive consciousness, in some difficult to define sense is holistic in character. This gives hope that it can finally be explained in 'quantum' terms. Classical mechanics, on the other hand, does not naturally accommodate and adequately explain ...

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.