Molecular dynamics simulation of protein
https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0398.1000166Abstract
MD simulation has become an essential tool for understanding the physical basis of the structure of proteins and their biological functions. During the current decade we witnessed significant progress in MD simulation of proteins with advancement in atomistic simulation algorithms, force fields, computational methods and facilities, comprehensive analysis and experimental validation, as well as integration in wide area bioinformatics and structural/systems biology frameworks. In this review, we present the methodology on protein simulations and recent advancements in the field. MD simulation provides a platform to study protein-protein, protein-ligand and protein-nucleic acid interactions. MD simulation is also done with NMR relaxation timescale in order to get residual dipolar coupling and order parameter of protein molecules.
References (31)
- Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, et al. (1983) CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations. J Comput Chem 4: 187-217.
- Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed- phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 24: 1999-2012.
- Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, et al.,(1995) A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117: 5179-5197.
- Kollman PA (1996) Advances and Continuing Challenges in Achieving Realistic and Predictive Simulations of the Properties of Organic and Biological Molecules. Acc Chem Res 29: 461-469.
- Foloppe N, MacKerell AD (2000) All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data. J Comput Chem 21: 86-104.
- Kaminski GA, Friesner RA (2001) Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides. J Phys Chem B 105: 6474-6487.
- Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25: 1656-1676.
- Schuler LD, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF (2001) An improved GROMOS96 force field for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the condensed phase. J Comput Chem 22: 1205-1218.
- Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79: 926-935.
- Mahoney MW, Jorgensen WL (2001) A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions. J Chem Phys 112: 8910-8922.
- Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 24: 6269-6271.
- Roux B, Simonson T (1999) Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem 78: 1-20.
- Cheatham TE, Miller JH, Fox T, Darden PA, Kollman PA (1995) Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Solvated Biomolecular Systems: The Particle Mesh Ewald Method Leads to Stable Trajectories of DNA, RNA, and Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 117: 4193-4194.
- Daggett V (2006) Protein folding-simulation. Chem Rev 106: 1898-1916.
- Hess B, van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2010) Gromacs user manual version 4.5.
- Liu GX, Tan JZ, Niu CY, Shen JH, Luo XM, et al. (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of interaction between protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B and a bidentate inhibitor. Acta Pharmacol Sin 27: 100-110.
- Case DA (2002) Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. Acc Chem Res 35: 325-331.
- Alder BJ, Wainwright TE (1957) Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System. J Chem Phys 27: 1208.
- Artymiuk PJ, Blake CC, Grace DE, Oatley SJ, Phillips DC, et al. (1979) Crystallographic studies of the dynamic properties of lysozyme. Nature 280: 563-568.
- Vitkup D, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Karplus M (2000) Solvent mobility and the protein 'glass' transition. Nat Struct Biol 7: 34-38.
- Hagen SJ, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA (1995) Protein reaction kinetics in a room- temperature glass. Science 269: 959-962.
- Karplus M, Mc Cammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 9: 646-652.
- Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781-1802.
- Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, et al. (2013) GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29: 845-854.
- Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, et al. (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688.
- Dror RO, Dirks RM, Grossman JP, Xu H, Shaw DE (2012) Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu Rev Biophys 41: 429-452.
- Tolman JR, Al-Hashimi HM, Kay LE, Prestegard JH (2001) Structural and dynamic analysis of residual dipolar coupling data for proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123: 1416-1424.
- Shinji Sunada, Nobuhiro Go (1995) Calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance order parameter in proteins by normal mode of analysis. J Chem Phys 104: 4768-4774.
- Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Klepeis JL, et al. (2008) Microsecond molecular dynamics simulation shows effect of slow loop dynamics on backbone amide order parameters of proteins. J Phys Chem B 112: 6155-6158.
- Best RB, Vendruscolo M (2004) Determination of protein structures consistent with NMR order parameters. J Am Chem Soc 126: 8090-8091.
- Giovanni Lipari, Attila Szabo, Ronald M Levy (1982) Protein dynamics and NMR relaxation: comparison of simulations with experiment. Nature 300: 197-198.