Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Disentangling the reaction mechanisms of weakly bound nuclei

2006, Physics Letters B

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSLETB.2006.02.005

Abstract

Complete and incomplete fusion cross sections for the 9 Be + 144 Sm reaction have been measured at near-barrier energies, using the delayed X-ray detection technique. At above-barrier energies these show a suppression of complete fusion for this weakly bound projectile on an intermediate mass target. The suppression factor, attributed to 9 Be break-up, was deduced from a comparison of complete fusion yields with coupled-channels calculations, and appears consistent with measured incomplete fusion product yields. At ∼ 10%, it is considerably smaller than the value of ∼ 30% previously found for a 208 Pb target. Simultaneous measurements of elastic and inelastic scattering permit a clearer picture of the reaction mechanisms.

References (30)

  1. L.F. Canto, P.R.S. Gomes, R. Donangelo, M.S. Hussein, Phys. Rep. 424 (2006) 1.
  2. M.S. Hussein, M.P. Pato, L.F. Canto, R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 377.
  3. N. Takigawa, M. Kuratani, H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. C 47 (1993) R2470.
  4. C.H. Dasso, A. Vitturi, Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) R12.
  5. L.F. Canto, R. Donangelo, P. Lotti, M.S. Hussein, Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995) R2848.
  6. K. Hagino, A. Vitturi, C.H. Dasso, S.M. Lenzi, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 037602.
  7. A. Diaz-Torrez, I.J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 024606.
  8. C. Signorini, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 2 (1998) 227.
  9. M. Dasgupta, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1395.
  10. M. Dasgupta, et al., Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 041602(R).
  11. Y.W. Wu, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 044605.
  12. M. Dasgupta, et al., Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 024606.
  13. D.J. Hinde, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 272701.
  14. S.B. Moraes, et al., Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 064608.
  15. P.R.S. Gomes, et al., Phys. Lett. B 601 (2004) 20.
  16. P.R.S. Gomes, et al., Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 034608.
  17. G.V. Marti, et al., Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 027602.
  18. V. Tripathi, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 172701.
  19. A. Di Pietro, et al., Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 044613.
  20. A. Gavron, Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 230.
  21. A.M.M. Maciel, et al., Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 2103.
  22. I.J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7 (1988) 167.
  23. A.J. Pacheco, D. Di Gregorio, J.O. Fernández Niello, M. Elgue, Comput. Phys. Commun. 52 (1988) 93.
  24. L.C. Chamon, et al., Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 014610.
  25. M.A.G. Alvarez, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 723 (2003) 93.
  26. J.J.S. Alves, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 748 (2005) 59.
  27. E. Crema, L.C. Chamon, P.R.S. Gomes, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 034610.
  28. K. Hagino, N. Rowley, A.T. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Commun. 123 (1999) 143.
  29. R.J. Woolliscroft, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 014611.
  30. R.J. Woolliscroft, et al., Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 044612.