Quantum gravity paper
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
A well-known symmetry exists between Coulomb’s law of electrostatic forces and Newton’s inverse square law of gravitation. Although the rules governing the forces between charged particles and gravitating particles are so similar, few have speculated that there is any direct relationship between the two forces. Instead, the mainstream of physics has posited a new particle (a graviton), yet undetected, to explain the force of gravity. In this paper, I intend to demonstrate how there may exist an equivalence relationship between the force of gravity and the electrostatic forces with a couple of new assumptions concerning fundamental physics.
FAQs
AI
What is the calculated gravitational force between two hydrogen atoms?add
The study calculates the gravitational force between two hydrogen atoms to be 1.86 × 10^-54 N at a distance of 0.1 m.
How does electron tunneling relate to gravitational attraction in atoms?add
The research proposes that tunneling electrons from one hydrogen atom to another generates an attractive force, contributing to gravitational effects.
What ratio is used to analyze gravitational and electrostatic forces?add
The paper utilizes a ratio of 4.17 × 10^42 to compare the gravitational attraction to the electrostatic repulsion.
How does the study's approach differ from Newton's gravity laws?add
The findings suggest that traditional Newtonian gravity inadequately describes atomic interactions, requiring adjustments for quantum phenomena.
What effect do uncharged particles have on electrostatic interactions?add
The presence of uncharged particles, particularly photons, attenuates the Coulomb force, influencing gravitational calculations between particles.
Related papers
The theoretical and experimental work of this author from 2014 to 2018 has been aimed at the exploration of the nature of mass and gravity. Over this period the view of mass and gravity has been modified and developed as ideas were adjusted to fit theory with observation and experiment. Mathematics has never been a substitute for observation and experiment (a view also expressed by Nikola Tesla in his Colorado Springs Notes).
1996
It is shown that certain structures in classical General Relativity can give rise to non-classical logic, normally associated with Quantum Mechanics. A 4-geon model of an elementary particle is proposed which is asymptotically flat, particle-like and has a non-trivial causal structure. The usual Cauchy data are no longer sufficient to determine a unique evolution. The measurement apparatus itself can impose non-redundant boundary conditions. Measurements of such an object would fail to satisfy the distributive law of classical physics. This model reconciles General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics without the need for Quantum Gravity. The equations of Quantum Mechanics are unmodified but it is not universal; classical particles and waves could exist and there is no graviton.
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2019
Quantum gravity is a field of theoretical physics that seeks to describe gravity according to the principles of quantum mechanics, and where quantum effects cannot be ignored, as almost compact astrophysical objects where gravity effects are strong. The current understanding of gravity is based on Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity, which is formulated within the framework of classical physics. On the other hand, the other three fundamental forces of physics are described within the framework of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, radically different formalisms for describing physical phenomena. It is sometimes argued that a description of quantum gravity is necessary based on the fact that a classical system cannot be consistently coupled with a quantum system. Although a quantum theory of gravity may be necessary to reconcile general relativity with the principles of quantum mechanics, difficulties arise when applying the usual prescriptions of quantum field theory to the force of gravity via gravitational bosons. Indexed Terms-gravity, quantum, and general relativity.
A Quantum-Physical Theory of Gravitation, 2024
Of the General Theory of Relativity it has been said that it is one of the most beautiful theories invented by man, in fact personally also at the time it impressed me a lot, which led me to study Tensor Analysis and to try to understand Riemannian Geometry, but the truth is that all that world seemed to me very complicated and therefore not very beautiful, and I understood why, when it was launched, it is said that only 12 people understood it. Enrique Loedel in his excellent book writes... “arriving at the same results obtained from the exact Schwarzchild solution... whose extremely simple structure does not agree with the extreme complication of the field equations, make us think of the possibility of obtaining such a solution in a simpler and more direct way”(7,pg318). It was this that motivated me, among others, to the present solution of the gravitational fields, after having applied the concept of Basic Systemic Unit in the derivation of the Pendulum Formula, of the Schrödinger wave equation and those of Special Relativity.
Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2001
The relationship between the classical and quantum theories of gravity is reexamined. The value of the gravitational potential defined with the help of the two-particle scattering amplitudes is shown to be in disagreement with the classical result of General Relativity given by the Schwarzschild solution. It is shown also that the potential so defined fails to describe whatever non-Newtonian interactions of macroscopic bodies. An alternative interpretation of theh 0-order part of the loop corrections is given directly in terms of the effective action. Gauge independence of that part of the one-loop radiative corrections to the gravitational form factors of the scalar particle is proved, justifying the interpretation proposed.
1996
Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 6
This work derives the relation between the Planck constant and Einstein’s gravitational constant. The relation between the Planck constant and Newton’s gravitational constant is deduced. The relation between the Planck constant and the electric force of 1 Coulomb and the magnetic force of 1 Henry is deduced. It establishes that the Planck constant represents the density of momentum of the void space in the Universe. This work proves that gravitational force has its opposite force in the internal momentum of atomic particles of matter. It establishes that two terms mass and electric charge introduced by mankind are not known in nature. It is proven that, in nature, there is only one type of force and that is the force-balance of inertial forces, between the internal momentum of particles and the reversely oriented force of its own force-field in the surroundings of mass particles. This work further maintains that the essence of the composition of the mass of all atomic particles, as well as all force fields in the universe, is the same and is created by the compression of density of the momentum of the void space.
This paper challenges the prevailing assumption of the graviton as a universally existing quantum particle mediating gravitational interactions. Grounded in the original framework of Einstein’s General Relativity, we argue that gravity emerges as a manifestation of spacetime curvature rather than as a force requiring a quantized mediator. By emphasizing the 3+1 dimensional structure of spacetime and the geometric interpretation of gravitation, we show that introducing a graviton contradicts both the principle of least action and the background-independent nature of general relativity. Through mathematical analysis and comparison with empirical models, we demonstrate that treating gravity as curvature yields consistent results without invoking a spin-2 particle. We further contend that the postulation of the graviton is a theoretical artifact lacking experimental basis, and its introduction complicates rather than resolves the integration of gravity with quantum theory. This critique invites a re-evaluation of current approaches to quantum gravity and calls for a return to the intrinsic logic of Einsteinian geometry.
Any theory of quantum gravity must be able to explain simultaneously the behaviour of the particles giving rise to gravity in the grand unification epoch of our universe as well as the state of the universe during and following a period of spontaneous symmetry-breaking. i.e. to ask the question as to whether or not our universe will end up in a period of heat death or whether there will be another Big Crunch leading ultimately to another Big Bang. Other than this we know very little about the size and extent of our own universe; but this may be possible to predict in the future. This is a book all about the state of our understanding of the connections between and limitations of our best current theories of matter, energy and space and time. It details my own personal journey to find a newer and more sophisticated model of gravitation and so how, and if, it may be possible to unify gravity with the three other, fundamental forces of nature; electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces. I am a citizen scientist and, as such, a lot of what I say – far from being scrutinized and commented-upon by the scientific community – will in fact be passed over. But the model I propose is something I'm sure we've all though about once or twice in physics class, that it really is the same force keeping electrons in orbit around the nucleus of the atom they belong to as it is keeping the earth in orbit around the sun. In the course of the ensuing first chapters I will give you a brief summary of quantum mechanics as it's currently understood, as well as general relativity and a survey of quantum field theory. I will then attempt to establish the basis for my model within a context which allows for gravity to be incorporated into a classical field theory exhibiting both particle and wave-like characteristics in objects at different points of their trajectories through space, based exclusively on the transmission of gauge bosons (or, just 'bosons') between particles appearing and disappearing within the same, underlying field; the descriptions of these processes will occupy the majority of the rest of the book. I should like to point out at this point that all of the ideas herein are my own and that I'm currently not affiliated with any institution of higher education, a research council or private sector organisation whose focus is research in physics. This is a personal theory of mine that I've developed over the .past two and a half years; or seven or eight possibly if you count reading about physics in my spare time. This is something I've always wanted to know the answer to and I feel as though I've figured it out. Naturally there are some details which still need to be worked out, such as the problem of explaining gravitational waves within the context this theory, but I hope in the future they will be. In any case, it forms a more complete explanation of gravity than the current theories competing at the moment; it also challenges preconceived notion about electrons and their behaviour which is, I feel, from a conceptual standpoint, a valuable contribution to our understanding of nature and the laws governing it. In spite of having no graduate, or even undergraduate, qualifications in physics I felt that this exercise has merit and is worth defending, I've hence decided to use this idea as my doctoral thesis in the philosophy of physics.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.