Co-Designing Change
2021, M/C Journal
https://doi.org/10.5204/MCJ.2801…
10 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The research investigates public support for the establishment of a representative Indigenous body, known as the 'Voice', in Australia, exploring whether it should be enshrined in the Constitution or established legislatively. Through nationally conducted surveys by OmniPoll, it examines fluctuations in support from 2017 to 2021, responding to the impact of limited information on public perception. The findings reveal nuanced changes in attitudes toward the constitutional versus legislated approaches, indicating a slight decline in overall support following the provision of detailed information on the concept of the 'Voice'.
Related papers
2016
Until recent times, democratic constitutions were generally the product of a ‘constituent assembly’. More recently, this mode of functioning of the constituent power has been challenged by new forms of its exercise on the basis of ‘participatory democracy’ schemes whereby ordinary citizens are encouraged to take part, within the ‘public space’, in the taking of public decisions. This kind of procedure, which first emerged mainly in the legislative and administrative sphere, is now increasingly frequent also in the creation of new constitutions, or in cases of amendments which bring major changes to the original text. Recent experiences show that there may be a close complementarity between the classic notion of ‘constituent assembly’ and a new concept of the ‘participatory constituent process’ which could accompany it.This paper takes advantage of the light cast by some recent cases in order to reflect on what effects are more likely to derive from constitutions which are written or...
Modern Law Review, 2009
In recent decades the use of referendums to settle major constitutional questions has increased dramatically. Addressing this phenomenon as a case study in the relationship between democracy and constitutional sovereignty, this article has two aims. The first is to argue that these constitutional referendums are categorically different from ordinary, legislative referendums, and that this has important implications for theories of constitutional sovereignty. Secondly, the article suggests that the power of these constitutional referendums to re-order sovereign relations raises significant normative questions surrounding the appropriateness of their use. The article engages with these normative questions, enquiring whether the recent turn in republican political theory towards deliberative democracy may offer a model through which sufficiently democratic referendum processes can be constructed.
M. Reuchamps and Y. Welp (Eds.), Deliberative Constitution-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, Routledge., 2023
The significance of citizen participation is increasingly being acknowledged in the context of constitutional change. The chapter will focus on deliberation – in particular in the guise of citizens’ assemblies - in relation to constitutional reforms. Various processes of constitutional amendment and constitution-making – or more broadly relating to issues of quasi-constitutional standing – have included forms of citizen deliberation. Deliberative democratic practices are situated within the bigger picture of citizen participation in constitutional reforms, and the basics of deliberation introduced, to subsequently examine a number of selected cases of citizen deliberation in processes of constitutional change, regarding exponents, forms of participant selection, site of deliberation, types of deliberation, outcomes and manifestations of participation in the process. The final section discusses a number of critical issues, including the ad hoc nature of deliberative processes, the issue of how to connect micro-level to macro-level deliberation and issues regarding representation, legitimacy, and empowerment.
2016
This chapter explores a constitutional referendum that is not well-recognized and rarely discussed in the academic literature, a type of referendum that is far from democratic and in which citizens' votes are used instrumentally to alter the constitution to boost the power and authority of incumbent leaders. Far from being rare, this type of referendum is actually very common in authoritarian and semi-authoritarian settings. I refer to it as a “power consolidation referendum”.
Australian Journal of Public Administration
The Final Report of the Referendum Council, which includes the Uluru Statement from the Heart, is a formal claim on the Australian people and its governing institutions. The claim is for a new conception of the unity of the Australian people so that for the first time historically it includes the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first sovereign nations of Australia. This is the significance of the recommendation that a First Nations Voice to Parliament be established in the Australian Constitution. This is not just a claim on the Australian constitution; it is a claim in public law that offers a new political-constitutional horizon of intelligibility for the Australian constitution. In the current reception of the Final Report, this has not been properly understood.
Electoral Studies, 1989
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks, 2022
This chapter discusses an important distinction in conceptions of the representation of future people in democratic decision-making processes. It thereby builds on the discussion of the All Affected Principle. Firstly, the authors argue that both of its predominant interpretations, the All Subjected Principle and the Principle of All Affected Interests, are complementing principles of democratic inclusion that correspond to different types of political representation. Secondly, the authors argue that the application of the All Subjected Principle can be further restricted under conditions of Political Modal Presentism. Political Modal Presentism prescribes that no hypothetical representative of an unborn person should hold more institutional political powers than is held by a representative of a living person with the same morally relevant characteristics. From Political Modal Presentism one can derive a narrow version of the All Subjected Principle. Based on this line of argument, this chapter demonstrates that under a narrow conception of the All Subjected Principle, one should not grant voting rights to representatives of future citizens. Modern democracies are representative democracies. Political decisions are taken by chosen representatives supposed to act in the interest of the people they represent. The representative element in modern democracies gives rise to the idea that future generations, whose lives and interests will be severely affected by present political decisions, should also be represented in present democratic processes. 1 It is not obvious, however, whether the representation of future persons can be rendered compatible with the * Rudolf Schuessler is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Bayreuth (Germany). ** Fritz Gillerke holds a PhD from the University of Bayreuth. He works as public sector consultant in Berlin (Germany).
Indigenous Law Bulletin, 2013

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.