Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Non-Memory: Conclusions
References
All Topics
Psychology
Cognitive Science

Non-memory: Remembering beyond the discursive and the symbolic

Profile image of Roma SendykaRoma Sendyka

Memory Studies

https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221085528
visibility

…

description

16 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Central and Eastern Europe—scenes of brutal genocides in the past century—are dotted with sites of trauma. Only some of those potential sites of memory are currently marked with plaques or memorials. Mnemonic responses to such sites do occur but are not part of an easily readable symbolic system within official culture. They are often contradictory: at once supporting and blocking memory about a given event. The concept of “non-memory” developed by Polish sociologists might be helpful in grasping vernacular memorial activities that do not privilege verbal contact as the norm in the transfer of memory. Non-memory tends to combine dismantled symbolic means and extra-symbolic embodied tools and performative acts. Non-memory therefore takes part in the transmission of an experience of the past in particular when the past turns out to be difficult or impossible to inscribe within available cognitive frameworks.

Related papers

The perception and interpretation of conflicting mnemonic narratives: Post-communist remembrance in East Germany and Poland
Krzysztof Świrek, Tomasz Rawski

International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2022

Every society is marked by memory gaps. Taking Poland and (East) Germany as examples, we use a social constructivist-poststructuralist approach and conduct focus groups and qualitative interviews to investigate how the communist past is remembered in private everyday discourse and its differentiation from the hegemonic public memory discourse. Both countries exhibit striking parallels in their everyday and hegemonic memory practices, but they differ in how the memory gap is interpreted: in Poland along class lines, in Germany according to quasi-ethnic lines. Thus, the study shows that private-public memory gaps may determine the societal (re)production of group-specific identities in mnemonic conflicts.

View PDFchevron_right
Iordachi, C. (2024). Heroes and Victims: Comparative Perspectives on Europe’s Multilayered Memory Cultures. East Central Europe, 51(2-3), 137-146.
Constantin Iordachi

East Central Europe, 2024

This article, and the special issue, explores aspects of the politics of history and processes of memory-making in post-1989 Europe, focusing on two key interrelated concepts: narratives of heroism and narratives of victimization.

View PDFchevron_right
Memory Genealogies in Central and Eastern Europe Theories and Methods.International Conference. Warsaw, 23–25 November 2011
Marta Karkowska

Polish Sociological Review, 2012

Within the last few years the diversity and complexity of studies of memory and its social, historical and spatial determinants have produced the need to take stock of the intellectual achievements in this area of study and to discuss the most recognized and influential theoretical and methodological approaches. It has also laid the foundations for the search for new approaches within the different humanistic disciplines and social sciences. Finally, it has encouraged the development of interdisciplinary research projects. In my opinion, the international conference Memory Genealogies in Central and Eastern Europe. Theories and Methods (which took place at the Warsaw University Library on 23-25 November 2011 2) was an interesting attempt to respond to these needs. The Conference attracted participants from Central and Eastern Europe, Western Europe and the United States of America, including historians, sociologists, anthropologists, ethnographers, and specialists in culture studies. 3 Central and Eastern European countries were well represented. There were more than 70 presenters. Two of them, Aleida Assmann and Jeffrey Olick, researchers who have greatly contributed to memory studies, evoked the largest interest. Their presentations stimulated heated discussions and polemics and set the tone for the entire conference. Other renowned memory scholars from Germany were also present, including

View PDFchevron_right
Memory cultures and politics of history. A plea forpolish-russian cooperation
Paulina Bednarz-Luczewska

2011

Once upon a time a Russian and a Pole laid the foundations for modern sociology. Their names were Pitirim Sorokin and Florian Znaniecki. After years of 'dependent development' of Polish and Russian social sciences it is high time we came back to the forgotten classics. A joint study of memory cultures and politics of history is a very good point to start with. It seems there are some lessons we can draw from the noble sociological ancestors. First is quite straightforward: we should communicate with one other, as they did. There is no intellectual creativity without constant cooperation. In a long exchange of letters, both scholars expressed great interest in one another's 'theory, their growing friendship, and a deep and grave concern with the general development of sociology' (Vaitkus, 1994. P. 230). Thus-and this is the second point-rather than imitating Western theoretical perspective we should try, drawing on it, to develop our own independent standpoint, which will combine both theory and research. Third, following in Sorokin's and Znaniecki's footsteps, we should look at society in its entirety. On this view, memory is not some self-contained phenomenon, but a part of broader social processes. Accordingly, in our paper we present a general research-program to analyze memory cultures. In this, we begin by sketching possible approaches to study phenomena in question; we go on, then, to construct a perspective, which will allow us to define and explain memory culture and politics of history in Poland and Russia. Approaches to memory In analyzing social practices connected with a national past, social scientists can employ a wide range of approaches. In the first place, they can make use of sociology of memory and memory studies in general, the field that exploded in the early eighties (

View PDFchevron_right
Re-remembering the Holocaust in Eastern Europe
Mila Dragojevic

Nationalities Papers

Jelena Subotić’s book is an important contribution to memory studies scholarship because it shows how the mechanism of memory appropriation connects state-led remembrance practices with the processes of national identity formation. Through the comparative analysis of Serbia, Croatia, and Lithuania, Subotić argues that Holocaust remembrance in these states is less about remembering the Holocaust – or acknowledging the states’ own responsibilities for the forced displacement and mass killing of the Jewish population on their territories – and more about the political use of the memory of the Holocaust in the context of the postcommunist transition and national identity insecurities. Yellow Star, Red Star, and particularly its chapters on Serbia and Croatia, nicely complement the existing literature – such as the work of Keith Brown, Siniša Malešević, Vjekoslav Perica, Dejan Jović, Emil Kerenji, Vjeran Pavlaković, Jelena Đureinović, Tamara Banjeglav, and Ana Ljubojević, among others – ...

View PDFchevron_right
Memory of Central and Eastern Europe Past Traumas, Present Challenges, Future Horizons
Ines Skibinski

The collective monograph Memory of Central and Eastern Europe: Past Traumas, Present Challenges, Future Horizons provides a unique platform for collaboration of different theoretical and conceptual approaches to memory and related studies. The first part of the book focuses on the issues related to the problematic aspects of memory in the context of urban and media space. The second part deals with the interaction between nation, national history and memory. The third part is devoted to the representation of memory and sheds light on the specific role of text as a means of cultural memory.

View PDFchevron_right
Polish Landscapes of Memory at the Sites of Extermination
Zuzanna Dziuban

Space and the Memories of Violence, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Memory Studies in Eastern Europe: Key Issues and Future Perspectives
Joanna Wawrzyniak

Polish Sociological Review, 2013

The paper addresses selected issues of the recent growth in Eastern European memory studies: It identifies the unconscious Western imperialism within the recently institutionalized interdisciplinary field of memory studies; Then, it offers arguments for historical sociology in memory studies, and proceeds to critically analyze the recent growth of transnational historical inquiries into European memory and the place within these studies of the research on Eastern Europe. Finally, it raises the theoretical issue of a region as one possible framework of memory and a terrain for legitimate sociological inquiry fuelled by historical data. As such, it serves as an introduction to the current PSR volume on theoretical traditions and propositions for Eastern European memory studies.

View PDFchevron_right
Kornelia Kończal and Clara Mansfeld: Conference Report: Regions of Memory. A Comparative Perspective on Eastern Europe, 26.11.2012–28.11.2012 Warsaw, in H-Soz-Kult, 27.03.2013.
Kornelia Kończal
View PDFchevron_right
Between Cultural Memory and Communicative Memory – the Dilemmas of Reconstruction of Annihilated Past of Polish Jews
Krzysztof Malicki

2015

This text presents briefly some of the elements of Polish discourse about collective memory of Holocaust during transformations. I refer to Assmann’s concept of communicative and cultural memories, which seems to help to explain the phenomenon of present memory, which can be observed. This text concentrates not on Polish memory of annihilation of Jews (so different from the memory of victims or perpetrators, not to mention different memory of other nations) but on its internal divisions and dilemmas which it generates. Along with war generation passing away, the decisive role of creating Polish memory about Shoah will be taken over by specialised institutions and rituals commemorating the past. In the early post -war period the transfer of memory happened mainly by the witness. The role of specialised institutions was marginal. From the beginning of XX century along with last witnesses passing away, the memory of Shoah became the focus of institutions (scientific institutions gather...

View PDFchevron_right

References (91)

  1. Kornelia Kończal and Joanna Wawrzyniak (Provincializing memory studies: Polish approaches in the past and present, 2018) point to the three dominating perspectives in memory studies, that is, Anglo- Saxon, French, and German.
  2. As a synonymous notion to "forgetting" the "non-memory" term can be found occasionally texts by Polish scholars: Chlebda, 2007, 2019; Golka, 2009; Kubiszyn, 2019; Szpociński, 2015; Wylegała, 2014;
  3. Zaleski, 2016. See also Joanna Tokarska-Bakir's note from 2018 on "Niepamięć/Oblivion": https://www. academia.edu/36244098/Niepami%C4%99%C4%87_Oblivion (accessed 16.03.2022).
  4. Kwiatkowski's differentiation between active and passive forms continues divisions proposed in Paul Ricoeur's (2006) Memory, History, Forgetting.
  5. For instance, an import of "frames of memory" from memory of other societies, or from global memorial culture.
  6. Changing attitude toward "silence that remembers" is well captured in Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi and Chana Teeger (2010).
  7. See also Beyond Memory: Silence and the Aesthetics of Remembrance (Dessingué and Winter, 2015).
  8. See, for instance, the seminal concept of post-memory by Marianne Hirsch.
  9. Kidron records the story told by the respondent identified as Michelle: her mother, a Holocaust survivor, kept a spoon from the camp, which she used during the meals. After she emigrated to Israel, she did not donated it to a museum or put it away for a collection of family memorabilia, but she continued to use it, kept it among other cutlery. The daughter interpreted this as an opportunity to daily remind herself of her personal victory and share this knowledge-strength with her family (Kidron, 2009: 11). Structurally quite similar example is the one from Tadeusz Różewicz's (2001) poem The Professor's Knife. Różewicz References
  10. Argenti N (2007) The Intestines of the State: Youth, Violence, and Belated Histories in the Cameroon Grassfields. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Assmann A (2012) Formen des Vergessens. In: Diasio N and Wieland K (eds) Die soziokulturelle (De-) Konstruktion des Vergessens: Bruch und Kontinuität in den Gedächtnisrahmenum 1945 und 1989. Bielefeld: Aisthesis, pp. 21-48.
  12. Assmann J and Hölscher T (1988) Kultur und Gedächtnis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  13. Augé M (2004) Oblivion. Minneapolis, MA: University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Baer U (2005) Spectral Evidence: The Photography of Trauma. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  15. Bańkowski A (2000) Etymologiczny słownik języka polskiego [Ethymological Vocabulary of the Polish Language], vol. 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  16. Bogumił Z and Głowacka-Grajper M (2019) Milieux de mémoire in Late Modernity: Local Communities, Religion and Historical Politics. Bern: Peter Lang.
  17. Bollas C (2017) The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Routledge.
  18. Chlebda W (2007) Tezy o niepamięci zbiorowej [Theses on collective non-memory]. Prace Filologiczne 53: 71-78.
  19. Chlebda W (2019) Z katalogu zadań pamięcioznawczych [From catalogue of the memory studies' tasks]. Stylistyka 28: 7-24.
  20. Cohen S (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  21. Cole J (2001) Forget Colonialism?: Sacrifice and the Art of Memory in Madagascar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  22. Collins F, Healy C and Radstone S (2020) Provincializing memory studies: the insistence of the "here-now." Memory Studies 13(5): 848-860.
  23. Connerton P (2008) Seven types of forgetting. Memory Studies 1(1): 59-71.
  24. David L (2017) Against standardization of memory. Human Rights Quarterly 39(2): 296-318.
  25. David L (2020) The Past Can't Heal Us: The Dangers of Mandating Memory in the Name of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Dessingué A and Winter JM (eds) (2015) Beyond Memory: Silence and the Aesthetics of Remembrance. New York: Routledge.
  27. Ferguson K (2003) Silence: a politics. Contemporary Political Theory 2(1): 49-65.
  28. Gabowitsch M (ed) (2017) Replicating Atonement: Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Golka M (2009) Pamięć społeczna i jej implanty [Social Memory and Its Implants]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  30. Gross JT (2004) Niepamięć zbiorowa [Collective non-memory]. Tygodnik Powszechny 32: 5.
  31. Hayner PB (1996) International guidelines for the creation and operation of truth commissions: a preliminary proposal. Law and Contemporary Problems 59(4): 173-180.
  32. Hirszowicz M and Neyman E (2001) Społeczne ramy niepamięci [Collective frames of non-memory].
  33. Kultura I Społeczeństwo 3-4: 23-48.
  34. Hirszowicz M and Neyman E (2007) The social framing of non-memory. International Journal of Sociology 1: 74-88.
  35. Holzer J (1995) Pamięć i niepamięć [Memory and non-memory]. Znak 5: 31-37.
  36. Jameson F (2005) Foreword: a monument to radical instants. In: Weiss P, Neugroschel J and Cohen R (eds) The Aesthetics of Resistance, Volume I: A Novel. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. Vii-L.
  37. Kaldewey D, Adloff F and Gerund K (eds) (2015) Revealing Tacit Knowledge: Embodiment and Explication. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishing.
  38. Kapralski S (2006) The Jedwabne village green?: the memory and counter-memory of the crime. History and Memory 18(1): 179-194.
  39. Kapralski S (2012) Naród z popiołów. Pamięć zagłady a tożsamość Romów [Nation from the Ashes. Memory of the Porrajmos and the Identity of Roma]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  40. Kapralski S (2016) Żydzi i Zagłada w polskich kulturach pamięci: między antagonizmem i agonem [Jews and the Holocaust in Polish memory cultures. Between antagonism and agon]. Teksty Drugie 6: 346-357.
  41. Kapralski S (2020) Niedyskursywna pamięć traumatyczna a tożsamość zbiorowa. Romowie wobec doświadczenia zagłady [Nondiscursive traumatic memory and collective identity. Roma facing the expe- rience of Porrajmos]. Prace Kulturoznawcze 2: 13-36
  42. Kevers R, Rober P, Derluyn I, et al. (2016) Remembering collective violence: broadening the notion of trau- matic memory in post-conflict rehabilitation. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 40(4): 620-640.
  43. Kidron CA (2003) Surviving a distant past: a case study of the cultural construction of trauma descendant identity. Ethos 31(4): 513-544.
  44. Kidron CA (2009) Toward an ethnography of silence: the lived presence of the past in the everyday life of Holocaust trauma survivors and their descendants in Israel. Current Anthropology 50(1): 5-27.
  45. Kidron CA (2015) Survivor family memory work at sites of Holocaust remembrance: institutional enlistment or family agency? History and Memory 27(2): 45-73.
  46. Kidron CA (2018) A comparative study of Jewish Israeli and Buddhist Khmer trauma descendant discon- tinued bonds with the genocide dead. In: Robben A (ed.) A Companion to the Anthropology of Death. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 145-160.
  47. Kidron CA (2021) Emancipatory voice and the recursivity of authentic silence: holocaust descendant accounts of the dialectic between silence and voice. History and Anthropology 32(4): 442-461.
  48. Kidron CA and Kirmayer LJ (2019) Global mental health and idioms of distress: the paradox of culture- sensitive pathologization of distress in Cambodia. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 43(2): 211-235.
  49. Kleinman A and Kleinman J (1994) How bodies remember: social memory and bodily experience of criti- cism, resistance, and delegitimation following China's cultural revolution. New Literary History 25(3): 707-723.
  50. Kończal K and Wawrzyniak J (2018) Provincializing memory studies: Polish approaches in the past and pre- sent. Memory Studies 11(4): 391-404.
  51. Kubiszyn M (2019) Niepamięć, postpamięć, współpamięć. Zagłada lubelskich Żydów jako przedmiot kultury pamięci [Non-memory, Postmemory, Shared Memory. The Holocaust of Lublin's Jews as a Subject of Memory Culture]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
  52. Kurkowska-Budzan M (2002) Imagining Jedwabne. The symbolic and the real. Polish Sociological Review 137: 113-116.
  53. Kurkowska-Budzan M (2008) Jedwabne: on emotions, power and identity in oral history research. Acta Poloniae Historica 97: 115-125.
  54. Kwiatkowski PT (2009) Społeczne tworzenie zbiorowej niepamięci [Social acts of collective non- memory]. In: Nijakowski LM (ed.) Etniczność, pamięć, asymilacja. Wokół problemów zachow- ania tożsamości mniejszości narodowych i etnicznych w Polsce [Ethnicity, Memory, Assimilation. Discussing Preservation of National and Ethnic Minorities in Poland]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, pp. 90-128.
  55. Kwiatkowski PT (2014) Niepamięć [Non-memory]. In: Saryusz-Wolska M and Traba R (eds) Modi memorandi. Leksykon [Modi Memorandi. A Lexicon]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, pp. 272-274.
  56. Lambek M (2002) The Weight of the Past: Living with History in Mahajanga, Madagascar. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  57. Landsberg A (2004) Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
  58. Lury C (1998) Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Memory, and Identity. New York: Routledge.
  59. Mälksoo M (2015) "Memory must be defended": beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue 46(3): 221-237.
  60. Martin JS (2020) The vernacular as method for memory and time: a philological and cultural exploration of Filipino concepts for Memory Studies. Memory Studies 13(5): 833-847.
  61. Mróz L (2000) Niepamięć nie jest zapominaniem. Cyganie-Romowie a Holokaust [Non-memory is not for- getting. Roma and the Holocaust]. Przegląd Socjologiczny 2: 89-114.
  62. Nowak J, Kapralski S and Niedźwiedzki D (2018) On the Banality of Forgetting; Tracing the Memory of Jewish Culture in Poland. Bern: Peter Lang.
  63. Obradović-Wochnik J (2013) The "silent dilemma" of transitional justice: silencing and coming to terms with the past in Serbia. International Journal of Transitional Justice 7(2): 328-347.
  64. Passerini L (2007) Memory and Utopia: The Primacy of Intersubjectivity. New York: Routledge.
  65. Polanyi M (1974 [1958]) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  66. Polanyi M (2009 [1966]) The Tacit Dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  67. Pollack M (2014) Kontaminierte Landschaften. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag.
  68. Poprzęcka M (2014) Łazienki-pamięć i niepamięć [Łazienki Park-Memory and Non-Memory]. Warszawa: Muzeum Łazienki Królewskie.
  69. Ricoeur P (2006) Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  70. Różewicz T (2001) Nożyk profesora [Professors' Knife]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskie.
  71. Sendyka R (2014) Prism. Understanding Non-Sites of Memory. In: Boyer JW and Molden B (eds) EUtROPEs: The Paradox of European Empire. Paris: University of Chicago Center in Paris, pp. 183-201.
  72. Sendyka R (2016) Sites that haunt: affects and non-sites of memory. East European Politics and Societies 30(4): 687-702.
  73. Sendyka R (2017) Posthuman memorialisations. Memorials after the forensic turn. In: Dziuban Z (ed.) Mapping the "Forensic Turn": Engagements with Materialities of Mass Death in Holocaust Studies and beyond. Vienna: New Academic Press, pp. 291-308.
  74. Sendyka R (2021) Poza obozem. Zrozumieć nie-miejsca pamięci [Beyond Camps. Understanding Non-Sites of Memory]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich.
  75. Sendyka R, Janus A, Jarzyńska K and Siewior K (2020) Nie-miejsca pamięci (2) Nekrotopologie [Non-Sites of Memory (2). Necrotopologies]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich.
  76. Shaw R (2002) Memories of the Slave Trade: Ritual and the Historical Imagination in Sierra Leone. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  77. Shaw R (2010) Afterword. In: Argenti N and Schramm K (eds) Remembering Violence: Anthropological Perspectives on Intergenerational Transmission. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 251-260.
  78. Siim P (2016) Family stories untold: doing family through practices of silence. Ethnologia Europaea 46: 74-88.
  79. Silberklang D (2015) Killing sites-research and remembrance. Introduction to the conference and IHRA perspective. In: Killing Sites-Research and Remembrance. Berlin: Metropol Verlag, pp. 21-30.
  80. Stoler A (2011) Colonial aphasia: race and disabled histories in France. Public Culture 23: 121-156.
  81. Stoller P (1994) Embodying colonial memories. American Anthropologist 96(3): 634-648.
  82. Szpociński A (2015) O niepamięci inaczej [About non-memory-differently].
  83. Edukacja Humanistyczna 2: 7-15.
  84. Törnquist-Plewa B (2003) The Jedwabne killings-a challenge for Polish collective memory. In: Zander U and Karlsson KG (eds) Echoes of the Holocaust: Historical Cultures in Contemporary Europe. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, pp. 141-176.
  85. Vinitzky-Seroussi V and Teeger C (2010) Unpacking the unspoken: silence in collective memory and forget- ting. Social Forces 88(3): 1103-1122.
  86. Winter J (2010) Thinking about silence. In: Ben-Ze'ev E, Ginio R and Winter J (eds) Shadows of War: A Social History of Silence in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-31.
  87. Winter J (2017) War beyond Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  88. Wolentarska-Ochman E (2006) Collective remembrance in Jedwabne: unsettled memory of World War II in postcommunist Poland. History and Memory 18(1): 152-178.
  89. Wylegała A (2014) Przesiedlenia a pamięć: Studium (nie)pamięci społecznej na przykładzie ukraińskiej Galicji i polskich "ziem odzyskanych" [Resettlements and Memory. A Study on the Social (Non)Memory based on the Case of Ukrainian Galicia and Polish "Regained Lands"]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  90. Zaleski M (2016) Natręctwo niepamięci naszej o Zagładzie [Obtrusiveness of our Oblivion about the Holocaust]. Teksty Drugie 6: 90-105.
  91. Zerubavel E (2006) The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Related papers

Anthropology of Memory: Eastern Europe between the 'Posts' (Winter 2022–2023, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)
Andrei Zavadski

2022

This seminar will scrutinise anthropological perspectives on memory in Eastern Europe. Through a range of regional case studies, it will discuss ethnographic approaches to analysing individual, vernacular, family, social, and cultural memory. We will explore how people embody, perform, feel about, and struggle over different pasts, with a focus on how these practices and affects are instrumentalised by political actors and how such instrumentalisations are resisted. Thematically the seminar will concentrate on (post)socialist, (post)colonial, and (post)national pasts and presents, and geographically on Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine. Participants will discuss how people in these three-as well as a few other-Eastern European countries engage in 'past presencing' (Macdonald 2013), that is, making fragments of the past part of the present. At the centre of the discussion will be the role of various pasts in the current Russia-Ukraine war, which gives the seminar an acute urgency. Topics covered will include borderland identities, Holodomor, Joseph Stalin and the Gulag, World War Two, nostalgia for the Soviet Union, the 1990s, the Belarusian protests of 2020, as well as the 'Leninopad' (the demolition of monuments to Vladimir Lenin in 2013-2014) and 'decommunisation' in Ukraine. Participants of the seminar will examine manifestations of these pasts and presents in people's everyday lives, artistic practices, and political resistance efforts. The seminar will comprise inputs by the instructors and as well as students, joint engagement with an artwork, a film or a literary work, guest speakers, and meaningful discussions in various formats. Sprache/Language: Beiträge in deutscher oder englischer Sprache sind willkommen. Contributions in English or German are welcome. Special needs: Please feel free to raise with us anything that can help your participation in the seminar. № Date Topics, Readings, Tasks 1 21.10. Introduction: All Things Memory Syllabus & organisational matters Expectations from the seminar Mind maps: types & concepts of memory; disciplinary perspectives on (group) memory; media of memory; memory cultures & memory regimes Questions for reflection What is 'collective'/group memory? What disciplines study memory? What are official memories & vernacular memories, marginalised & silenced memories? What is the role of forgetting? 2 28.10.

View PDFchevron_right
Ways of Remembering: the Case of Poland
Sarmatian Review Polish Institute of Houston
View PDFchevron_right
Polish memory of the Holocaust in the 21st century: the art of remembering and forgetting
Olga Kubińska

THE HOLOCAUST: BETWEEN HISTORY AND MEMORY, 2024

Ongoing discussion on collective memory in contemporary Poland requires constant efforts to defi ne and redefi ne the objects under dispute, particularly in reference to the Holocaust and the Second World War. What requires such redefi nition is the very area to be scrutinized and the basic terminology to be implemented, with the necessity to discriminate between collective memory shaped by offi cial historical policy, collective memory shaped by historians, writers and artists, alongside the offi cially sanctioned memory. The question arises whether the memory shaped by historians, writers and artists forms an alternative to the offi cially canonized variant and whether in these circumstances we keep looking at distinct, mutually exclusive memories.

View PDFchevron_right
Теоретические дискурсы и дискуссии. Memory cultures and politics of history. A plea for Polish-Russian cooperation
Michal Luczewski

isras.ru

Once upon a time a Russian and a Pole laid the foundations for modern sociology. Their names were Pitirim Sorokin and Florian Znaniecki. After years of 'dependent development' of Polish and Russian social sciences it is high time we came back to the forgotten classics. A joint study of memory cultures and politics of history is a very good point to start with.

View PDFchevron_right
“Stones of memory”? Monuments in grass-roots’ discourse, [in:] Between Obligation and New Order. From studies on relationships among memory cultures in former East Prussia after World War Two. Studies and sketches, ed. K. Narojczyk, Olsztyn 2014, pp. 145-161.
Jacek Kowalewski
View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Embodied Cognition
  • Memory Studies
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved