Emotional Engagement in Agentive Science Learning Environments
2014
Abstract
As students engage in ambitious intellectual activities, they inevitably manage social interactions and emotional responses in the classroom. In this research, we studied fifth graders’ emotional engagement in elementary science classes redesigned to offer more ambitious, agentive learning. We examined student self-reports of affective states to address the following questions: (1) Do students in “Agency” classes report more positive or negative emotional experiences, compared to students in classes that use traditional, kit-based science units? (2) To what extent do students’ emotional experiences vary as a function of class? Findings indicate that, after taking classroom differences into account, students in Agency classes generally felt more positive about their experiences in science than students in kitbased classes. Next steps include exploring differences across classrooms and synthesizing research on learning, affect and identity.
References (19)
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2009). Teaching how science really works. Education Canada, (49)3, 14-17.
- Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Dreyfus, H. L. (1984). What expert systems can't do. Raritan, 3(4), 22-36.
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
- Engle, R. A., McKinney de Royston, M., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2008). Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating { XE "negotiating" } quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.
- Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2007). Power in An analysis of how shifts in social{ XE "social" } and mathematical power{ XE "power" } among students in a cooperative group affect opportunities for learning { XE "learning" } . P a p e r p r e s e n t e d a t t h e A m e r i c a n E d u c a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h A s s o c i a t i o n , Chicago, IL.
- Greeno{ XE "Greeno" }, J. G. (2002). Students with competence, authority, and accountability: Affording intellective identities in classrooms. New York: The College Board.
- Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 327-369.
- Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavios. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482.
- Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). t Engagement in Fourth Grade. Cognition and Instruction. 16 (4), 431-73.
- Herrenkohl, L.R. and Mertl, V. (2011). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge UK, New York City: Cambridge University Press.
- Herrenkohl, L.R., Palincsar, A.S., DeWater, L.S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 451-493.
- Holland{ XE "Holland" }, D., Lachicotte{ XE "Lachicotte" }, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency{ XE "agency" } in cultural{ XE "cultural" } worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Metz, K. (2000). Young chldren's inquiry in biology. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. (pp. 371-404). Washington, DC: AAAS.
- Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural{ XE "sociocultural" } perspectives on race, culture, and learning{ XE "learning" }. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449-479.
- Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., and Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural{ XE "cultural" } process. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.489-504). NY: Cambridge University Press. National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: NAP National Research Council (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: NAP Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (October 2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331-337.
- Scalone, G. (2014). Cultivating Agency in Science Argumentation and Sense-making in Elementary Science Classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Spiro, M. (1982). Collective representations and mental representations in religious symbol systems. In J. Maquet (Ed.), On symbols in anthropology: Essays in honor of Harry Hoijer (pp. 45-72). Malibu: Udena.
- White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling and metcognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.