Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Some stability properties of dynamic neural networks

2001, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications

https://doi.org/10.1109/81.904893

Abstract

In this paper, the passivity-based approach is used to derive a tuning algorithm for a class of dynamic neural networks. Several stability properties, such as passivity, asymptotic stability, input-to-state stability and bounded input-bounded output stability, are guaranteed in certain senses.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What stability criteria are established for dynamic neural networks with passive methods?add

The research finds that using a gradient-like learning law ensures global asymptotic stability (GAS) and input-to-state stability (ISS) under certain conditions, especially when the system is passive.

How does the passivity framework enhance stability analysis in neural networks?add

The study demonstrates that the passivity framework allows for generalized conclusions on stability using only input-output characteristics, simplifying the analysis of dynamic neural networks.

What role do Lyapunov functions play in stability assessments?add

The paper indicates that Lyapunov functions are crucial for establishing stability; specifically, a positively defined storage function contributes to proving input-to-state stability and asymptotic stability.

What practical implications arise from the findings on dynamic neural networks?add

The results suggest that dynamic neural networks can effectively control nonlinear systems without full model information, thus promoting their application in real-time identification and control tasks.

What limitations exist in current research regarding the stability of neural circuits?add

The authors note that existing studies primarily focus on Lyapunov methods, highlighting a gap in open-loop passivity analyses which could expand the understanding of dynamic neural network stability.

References (19)

  1. C. I. Byrnes, A. Isidori, and J. C. Willems, "Passivity, feedback equiv- alence, and the global stabilization of minimum phase nonlinear sys- tems," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 36, pp. 1228-1240, Nov., 1991.
  2. S. Commuri and F. L. Lewis, "CMAC neural networks for control of nonlinear dynamical systems: Structure, stability and passivity," Auto- matica, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 635-641, 1996.
  3. D. Hill and P. Moylan, "Stability results for nonlinear feedback sys- tems," Automatica, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 377-382, 1976.
  4. J. J. Hopfield, "Neurons with grade response have collective computa- tional properties like those of a two-state neurons," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 3088-3092, 1984.
  5. K. J. Hunt, D. Sbarbaro, R. Zbikowski, and P. J. Gawthrop, "Neural net- works for control systems-A survey," Automatica, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1083-1112, 1992.
  6. S. Jagannathan and F. L. Lewis, "Identification of nonlinear dynamical systems using multilayered neural networks," Automatica, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1707-1712, 1996.
  7. K. Kaszkurewics and A. Bhaya, "On a class of globally stable neural circuits," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 41, pp. 171-174, Feb. 1994.
  8. H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren- tice-Hall , 1996.
  9. M. Forti, S. Manetti, and M. Marini, "Necessary and sufficient condition for absolute stability of neural networks," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 41, pp. 491-494, Jul. 1994.
  10. E. B. Kosmatopoulos, M. M. Polycarpou, M. A. Christodoulou, and P. A. Ioannpu, "High-order neural network structures for identification of dynamical systems," IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 6, pp. 442-431, Apr. 1995.
  11. F. L. Lewis, K. Liu, and A. Yesildirek, "Multilayer neural-net robot con- troller with guaranteed tracking performance," IEEE Trans. Neural Net- works, vol. 7, pp. 388-398, Apr. 1996.
  12. K. Matsouka, "Stability conditions for nonlinear continuous neural net- works with asymmetric connection weights," Neural Netw., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 495-500, 1992.
  13. A. S. Poznyak, W. Yu, and E. N. Sanchez, "Dynamic multilayer neural networks for nonlinear system on-line identification," IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 10, pp. 1402-1411, Nov. 1999.
  14. G. A. Rovithakis and M. A. Christodoulou, "Adaptive control of un- known plants using dynamical neural networks," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., vol. 24, pp. 400-412, Oct. 1994.
  15. E. N. Sanchez and J. P. Perez, "Input-to-state stability analysis for dy- namic neural networks," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, to be published.
  16. R. Sepulchre, M. Jankovic, and P. V. Kokotovic, Constructive Nonlinear Control. London: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
  17. E. D. Sontag and Y. Wang, "On characterization of the input-to-state stability property," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 351-359, 1995.
  18. J. A. K. Suykens, J. Vandewalle, and B. De Moor, "Lur's systems with multilayer perceptron and recurrent neural networks; Absolute stability and dissipativity," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 44, pp. 770-774, Apr. 1999.
  19. W. Yu and A. S. Poznyak, "Indirect adaptive control via parallel dynamic neural networks," Proc. IEE-Control Theory Applicat., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 25-30, 1999.