Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Test of Physiological Performance: Rationale and Feasibility

2022, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519422500191

Abstract

Rigorous clinical evaluation of the physiological performance is currently performed with complex and long procedures which need expensive technology and skilled operators. In a wide range of situations (frail patients, daily clinical practice, etc.), these approaches are difficult to be applied and simpler tests, with a lack of scientific background, are mandatory. To avoid these problems, we propose a test (test of physiological performance (TOPP)) to evaluate the physiological behavior of a subject, in a really easy and safe clinical setting, measuring only the heart rate. The subject is submitted to an active standing-up test and then two submaximal exercises (with a low power load) on a cycle-ergometer. The heart rate modifications due to each submaximal step are analyzed by exponential interpolation to calculate the ascending and descending time constants and evaluate the way each subject adapts his heart rate to work. The standard deviation of the RR for each stationary phase...

References (47)

  1. Guazzi M, Dickstein K, Vicenzi M, Arena R, Six-minute walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure: A comparative analysis on clinical and prognostic insights, Circ Heart Fail 2:549-555, 2009.
  2. Halliday SJ et al., Six-minute walk distance in healthy young adults, Respir Med 165:105933, 2020.
  3. Rizzi M et al., Usefulness of six-minute walk test in systemic sclerosis, Clin Exp Rheumatol 36(Suppl. 113):161-167, 2018.
  4. Klein SR et al., Performance di®erence on the six-minute walk test on tracks of 20 and 30 meters for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Validity and reliability, Braz J Phys Ther 25:40-47, 2021.
  5. Goodwin AM et al., Limitations of 6-minute walk test reference values for spinal muscular atrophy, Muscle Nerve 61:375-382, 2020. Test of Physiological Performance: A Proposal 2250019-13
  6. J. Mech. Med. Biol. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by 3.93.21.38 on 03/24/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
  7. Murphy AC, Meehan G, Koshy AN, Kunniardy P, Farouque O, Yudi MB, E±cacy of smartphone-based secondary preventive strategies in coronary artery disease, Clin Med Insights Cardiol 14:1179546820927402, 2020.
  8. Douma JAJ, Verheul HMW, Bu®art LM, Feasibility, validity and reliability of objective smartphone measurements of physical activity and ¯tness in patients with cancer, BMC Cancer 18:1052, 2018.
  9. Ata R et al., Clinical validation of smartphone-based activity tracking in peripheral artery disease patients, NPJ Digit Med 1:66, 2018.
  10. Rubin DS et al., Development and pilot study of an iOS smartphone application for perioperative functional capacity assessment, Anesth Analg 131:830-839, 2020.
  11. Daines KJF, Baddour N, Burger H, Bavec A, Lemaire ED, Fall risk classi¯cation for people with lower extremity amputations using random forests and smartphone sensor features from a 6-minute walk test, PLOS One 16:e0247574, 2021.
  12. Houchen-Wollo® L, Daynes E, Watt A, Chaplin E, Gardiner N, Singh S, Which func- tional outcome measures can we use as a surrogate for exercise capacity during remote cardiopulmonary rehabilitation assessments? A rapid narrative review, ERJ Open Res 6:00526, 2020.
  13. Mgbemena N, Jones A, Leicht AS, Relationship between handgrip strength and lung function in adults: A systematic review, Physiother Theory Pract 1-20, 2021.
  14. Kittelson A, Carmichael J, Stevens-Lapsley J, Bade M, Psychometric properties of the 4-meter walk test after total knee arthroplasty, Disabil Rehabil 1-7, 2020.
  15. Yabe H et al., Predicting a target exercise heart rate that re°ects the anaerobic threshold in nonbeta-blocked hemodialysis patients: The Karvonen and heart rate reserve formulas, Ther Apher Dial 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13628.
  16. Fotheringham I, Meakin G, Punekar YS, Riley JH, Cockle SM, Singh SJ, Comparison of laboratory-and ¯eld-based exercise tests for COPD: A systematic review, Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 10:625-643, 2015.
  17. Burge AT et al., Application of the modi¯ed incremental step test for pulmonary reha- bilitation, Phys Ther 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab044.
  18. Besson D et al., Is the short and fast step test a safe and feasible tool for exploring anaerobic capacities of individuals with coronary heart disease in clinical practice?, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06713-7.
  19. Razvi Y, Ladie DE, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2021.
  20. Malhotra R, Bakken K, D'Elia E, Lewis GD, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart failure, JACC Heart Fail 4:607-616, 2016.
  21. Mezzani A et al., Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: A report from the exercise physiology section of the European association for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation, Eur J Car- diovasc Prev Rehabil 16:249-267, 2009.
  22. Svedahl K, MacIntosh BR, Anaerobic threshold: The concept and methods of measure- ment, Can J Appl Physiol 28:299-323, 2003.
  23. Poole DC, Rossiter HB, Brooks GA, Gladden LB, The anaerobic threshold: 50+ years of controversy, J Physiol 599:737-767, 2021.
  24. Neder JA, Phillips DB, Marillier M, Bernard AC, Berton DC, O'Donnell DE, Clinical interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Current pitfalls and limitations, Front Physiol 12:552000, 2021.
  25. Michael S, Graham KS, Davis GM, Cardiac autonomic responses during exercise and post-exercise recovery using heart rate variability and systolic time intervals-a review, Front Physiol 8:301, 2017.
  26. Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Tomaselli GF, Braunwald E (eds.), Braun- wald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 11th edn., Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 2019.
  27. Bartels-Ferreira R et al., Can a ¯rst-order exponential decay model ¯t heart rate recovery after resistance exercise?, Clin Physiol Funct Imag 35:98-103, 2015.
  28. Sokas D, Petrėnas A, Daukantas S, Rapalis A, Paliakaitė B, Marozas V, Estimation of heart rate recovery after stair climbing using a wrist-worn device, Sensors 19:2113, 2019.
  29. Thomson RL, Rogers DK, Howe PRC, Buckley JD, E®ect of acute exercise-induced fatigue on maximal rate of heart rate increase during submaximal cycling, Res Sports Med 24:1-15, 2016.
  30. Peçanha T, Silva-Júnior ND, Forjaz CLDM, Heart rate recovery: Autonomic determi- nants, methods of assessment and association with mortality and cardiovascular diseases, Clin Physiol Funct Imag 34:327-339, 2014.
  31. Storniolo JL, Esposti R, Cavallari P, Heart rate kinetics and sympatho-vagal balance accompanying a maximal sprint test, Front Psychol 10:2950, 2020.
  32. Pierpont GL, Stolpman DR, Gornick CC, Heart rate recovery post-exercise as an index of parasympathetic activity, J Auton Nerv Syst 80:169-174, 2000.
  33. Barak OF, Ovcin ZB, Jakovljevic DG, Lozanov-Crvenkovic Z, Brodie DA, Grujic NG, Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise in four di®erent recovery protocols in male athletes and non-athletes, J Sports Sci Med 10:369-375, 2011.
  34. Bellenger CR et al., Heart rate acceleration at relative workloads during treadmill and overground running for tracking exercise performance during functional overreaching, Sci Rep 10:14622, 2020.
  35. Martinmäki K, Rusko H, Time-frequency analysis of heart rate variability during im- mediate recovery from low and high intensity exercise, Eur J Appl Physiol 102:353-360, 2008.
  36. Manresa-Rocamora A et al., Heart rate-based indices to detect parasympathetic hyper- activity in functionally overreached athletes. A meta-analysis, Scand J Med Sci Sports 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13932.
  37. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society of pacing and electrophysiology, Eur Heart J 17:354-381, 1996.
  38. Mathias CJ, Corazza I, Guaraldi P, Barletta G, Cortelli P, Autonomic nervous system: Clinical testing, in Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, Elsevier, 2017.
  39. Corazza I et al., A new integrated instrumental approach to autonomic nervous system assessment, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 117:267-276, 2014.
  40. Finucane C et al., A practical guide to active stand testing and analysis using continuous beat-to-beat non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, Clin Auton Res 29:427-441, 2019.
  41. Trust-region methods, in Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York, pp. 66-100, 2006.
  42. Guaraldi P et al., Cardiovascular changes during maximal breath-holding in elite divers, Clin Auton Res 19:363-366, 2009.
  43. Singh N, Moneghetti KJ, Christle JW, Hadley D, Plews D, Froelicher V, Heart rate variability: An old metric with new meaning in the era of using mHealth technologies for health and exercise training guidance. Part one: Physiology and methods, Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev 7:193-198, 2018.
  44. Singh N, Moneghetti KJ, Christle JW, Hadley D, Froelicher V, Plews D, Heart rate variability: An old metric with new meaning in the era of using mHealth technologies for health and exercise training guidance. Part two: Prognosis and training, Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev 7:247-255, 2018. Test of Physiological Performance: A Proposal 2250019-15
  45. J. Mech. Med. Biol. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by 3.93.21.38 on 03/24/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
  46. Mongin D, Chabert C, Courvoisier DS, García-Romero J, Alvero-Cruz JR, Heart rate recovery to assess ¯tness: Comparison of di®erent calculation methods in a large cross- sectional study, Res Sports Med 1-14, 2021.
  47. Wu GQ et al., Chaotic signatures of heart rate variability and its power spectrum in health, aging and heart failure, PLOS One 4:e4323, 2009.