Dynamics of trust reciprocation in multi-relational networks
2013, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2555242Abstract
Understanding the dynamics of reciprocation is of great interest in sociology and computational social science. The recent growth of Massively Multi-player Online Games (MMOGs) has provided unprecedented access to large-scale data which enables us to study such complex human behavior in a more systematic manner. In this paper, we consider three different networks in the EverQuest2 game: chat, trade, and trust. The chat network has the highest level of reciprocation (33%) because there are essentially no barriers to it. The trade network has a lower rate of reciprocation (27%) because it has the obvious barrier of requiring goods or money for exchange; morever, there is no clear benefit to returning a trade link except in terms of social connections. The trust network has the lowest reciprocation (14%) because this equates to sharing certain within-game assets such as weapons, and so there is a high barrier for such connections In general, we observe that reciprocation rate is inversely related to the barrier level in these networks. We also note that reciprocation has connections across the heterogeneous networks. Our experiments indicate that players make use of the medium-barrier reciprocations to strengthen a relationship. We hypothesize that lower-barrier interactions are an important component to predicting higherbarrier ones. We verify our hypothesis using predictive models for trust reciprocations with features from trade interactions. Incorporating the number of trades (both before and after the initial trust link) boosts our ability to predict if the trust will be reciprocated up to 11% with respect to the AUC. More generally, we see strong correlations across the different networks and emphasize that network dynamics, such as reciprocation, cannot be studied in isolation on just a single type of connection.
References (21)
- D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabsi, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, and M. V. Alstyne, "Computational social science," vol. 323, no. 5915, pp. 721-723, 2009.
- N. Yee, "Motivations for play in online games," Cyberpsychology and Behavior, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 772-775, 2006.
- E. Castronova, Synthetic Worlds : The Business and Culture of Online Games. University Of Chicago Press, 2005.
- M. Szell and S. Thurner, "Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game," Social Networks, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 313- 329, 2010.
- A. W. Gouldner, "The norms of reciprocity: A preliminary statement," American Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 161-178, 1960.
- S. Leider, M. M. Mbius, T. Rosenblat, and Q.-A. Do, "Directed altruism and enforced reciprocity in social networks," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 1815-1851, 2009.
- K. V. Hansen, "The asking rules of reciprocity in networks of care for children," Qualitative Sociology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421-437, 2004.
- C. A. Bliss, I. M. Kloumann, K. D. Harris, C. M. Danforth, and P. S. Dodds, "Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness," Journal of Computational Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 388-397, 2012.
- V. Zlatić and H. Štefančić, "Model of wikipedia growth based on information exchange via reciprocal arcs," EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 93, no. 5, p. 58005, 2011.
- N. Durak, T. G. Kolda, A. Pinar, and C. Seshadhri, "A scalable null model for directed graphs matching all degree distributions: In, out, and reciprocal," in Proc. IEEE 2nd Workshop on Network Science, 2013.
- M. A. Ahmad, D. A. Huffaker, J. Wang, J. W. Treem, M. S. Poole, and J. Srivastava, "GTPA: A generative model for online mentor-apprentice networks," in AAAI, 2010.
- D. Garlaschelli and M. I. Loffredo, "Patterns of Link Reciprocity in Directed Networks," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, p. 268701, 2004.
- G. Zamora-Lopez, V. Zlatic, C. Zhou, H. StefanCic, and J. Kurths, "Reciprocity of networks with degree correlations and arbitrary degree sequences," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 77, p. 016106, 2008.
- L. Akoglu, P. V. de Melo, and C. Faloutsos, "Quantifying reciprocity in large weighted communication networks," in Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD), 2012, pp. 85-96.
- C. Wang, A. Strathman, O. Lizardo, D. Hachen, Z. Toroczkai, and N. V. Chawla, "Weighted reciprocity in human communication networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.2822, 2011.
- M. Szell, R. Lambiotte, and S. Thurner, "Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world," Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 31, pp. 13 636-13 641, 2010.
- J. Cheng, D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. M. Kleinberg, "Predicting reciprocity in social networks," in IEEE SocialComm/PASSAT, 2011, pp. 49-56.
- V. Zlatic and H. Stefancic, "Influence of reciprocal edges on degree distribution and degree correlations," Physical Review E, vol. 80, no. 1, p. 016117, 2009.
- M. A. Ahmad, Z. Borbora, J. Srivastava, and N. S. Contractor, "Link prediction across multiple social networks," in ICDM Workshops, 2010, pp. 911-918.
- L. A. N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, and H. E. Stanley, "Classes of small-world networks," Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 97, no. 21, pp. 11 149-11 152, 2000.
- M. Ahmad, I. Ahmed, J. Srivastava, and M. Poole, "Trust me, i'm an expert: Trust, homophily and expertise in mmos," in IEEE Social- Comm/PASSAT, 2011, pp. 882-887.