Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

On the Maximum Uniquely Restricted Matching for Bipartite Graphs

2011, Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENDM.2011.05.059

Abstract

We study the approximability of computing a maximum size uniquely restricted matching in a given bipartite graph. We prove that it is hard to approximate within a factor of O(n 1 3 −), for any > 0, unless NP=ZPP, and it is APX-complete when restricted to bipartite graphs of degree at most 3. We show that it can be approximated within a factor of 2 when restricted to 3-regular bipartite graphs.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What is the main challenge in approximating Max-UR-Matching for bipartite graphs?add

The research shows that Max-UR-Matching cannot be approximated within a factor of O(n^{1/3-ε}) for any ε > 0 unless NP=ZPP, emphasizing its complexity.

How does Max-UR-Matching relate to known NP-complete problems?add

Max-UR-Matching is proven NP-complete even for bipartite graphs, with strong connections to the MAX-IS problem via approximation-preserving reductions.

What are the approximation factors for specific types of graphs?add

The paper establishes that Max-UR-Matching is approximable within a factor of 2 - 4n^{-2} for 3-regular bipartite graphs and 4 for 3-regular graphs.

What prior work established the NP-completeness of Max-UR-Matching?add

Golumbic et al. confirmed the NP-completeness for various graph types and provided linear time algorithms for certain specific classes.

What characterizes a uniquely restricted matching in a graph?add

A uniquely restricted matching is defined as the unique maximum matching within the induced subgraph, exemplifying its exclusivity over vertices spanned by the matching.

References (8)

  1. Elbassioni, K., R. Raman, S. Ray and R. Sitters, On the approximability of the maximum feasible subsystem problem with 0/1-coefficients, Proceedings of the twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA (2009), 1210-1219.
  2. Golumbic,M. C., T. Hirst and M. Lewenstein, Uniquely restricted matchings, Algorithmica 31 (2001), 139-154.
  3. Håstad, J., Clique is hard to approximate within n 1-ε , Acta Mathematica 182 (1999), 105-142.
  4. Haldórsson, M. M., Approximations of weighted independent set and hereditary subset problems, Jr. of Graph Algorithms and Applications 4 (2000), 1-16.
  5. Hershkowitz, D., and H. Schnider, Ranks of zero patterns and sign patterns, Linear and Multilinear Algebra 34 (1993), 3-19.
  6. Papadimitriou, C. H., "Computational Complexity", Addison Wesley (1994).
  7. Papadimitriou, C. H., and M. Yannakakis, Optimization, Approximation, and Complexity Classes, J. Comput. System Sci. 43 (1991), 425-440.
  8. Yannakakis, M., and F. Gavril, Edge dominating sets in graphs, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 38 (1980), 364-372.