Paranarrative, Postcinema, and the Unheimlich Glitch
2018, Utsanga.it
Abstract
Mere materiality, the recognition and identification of the "substance" of digital media as an encoded, electronic signal only becomes a critical engagement through a leap from this immanent identification of substance to significance, requiring more than just an acknowledgement of the "ontology" of digital facture. Digital media is rendered for humans by an apparatus operating invisibly, continuously, and autonomously; however, interrupting the normative operation of the device is an insignificant challenge-lapses, drop-outs and other computer failures are commonplace, as are the slight "errors" familiar from the resolution, compression, and sampling apparent in the aesthetics of the movie. These transient electronic misfunctions, "glitches," are ignored or elided from consideration, demonstrating the aura of the digital in operation. The ideally-conceived digital signal transcends its particular, immanent encounter (always distinct from the perfection of the immaterial digital 'object') in a separation of digitality from its materiality that is a fantasy of transcendent perfection. Conceiving the digital as independent of its presentation blocks the identification of materialist significance: the identification qua glitch as noise (a non-signifier) ends any further need for engagement, but also demonstrates that all interpretations are dependent on their lowest level identification as requiring consideration and attention; the audience's internalization of this condition is the aura of the digital. Emergent post-digitality presents basic difficulties of conceptualization.
References (13)
- Brecht, B. "Alienation Effects in Chinese Acting" Brecht on Theater: The Development of an Aesthetic ed. and trans. J. Willet (New York: Hill and Wang, 1992) p. 92.
- Jentsch, E. "On the Psychology of the Uncanny (1906)" trans. Roy Sellars, Angelaki 2.1 (1995) pp. 7-16.
- Irei, N. "'Abolishing Aesthetics': Gestus in Brecht's Arturo Ui" Rocky Mountain Review, vol. 70, no. 2 (Fall 2016) p. 150.
- Brecht, B. "The Popular and the Realistic" Brecht on Theater: The Development of an Aesthetic ed. and trans. J. Willet (New York: Hill and Wang, 1992) p. 108-109.
- Freud, S. "The Uncanny (1919)" trans. Alix Strachey, accessed online, February 2, 2018 http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdf
- Betancourt, M. "Critical Glitches and Glitch Art" Harmonia: Glitch, Movies and Visual Music (Rockport: Wildside Press, 2018) pp. 149-172.
- Weyler, K. "Seriality and Susanna Rowson's Sincerity" Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers vol. 34, no. 1 (2017) p. 169.
- Eco, U. The Limits of Interpretation (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990) p. 92.
- Robinson. D. Estrangement and the Somatics of Literature (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008) p. 199.
- Martens, G. and Biebuyck, B. "Channeling figurativity through narrative: The Paranarrative in Fiction and Non-Fiction" Literature and Language, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 249-262.
- Eco, U. The Limits of Interpretation (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990) p. 91.
- Robinson. D. Estrangement and the Somatics of Literature (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008) pp. 198-200.
- Robinson, D. "The Spatiotemporal Dialectic of Estrangement" TDR vol. 51, no. 4 (Winter, 2007) pp. 123-124.