Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Research Setting and Participants
Research Design
Procedure: Data Sources
Data Collection and Analysis
Results
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Languages and Linguistics
Language Acquisition

The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery

Profile image of M. DobberM. Dobber

2019, Educational Studies in Mathematics

https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-019-09898-3
visibility

…

description

20 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

The aims of this article are to document the types of signs that young children make to represent their mathematical thinking, and to determine the extent to which features of usagebased language acquisition are evident in children's early graphical communications made in mathematical contexts. Studies of young children's symbolic principles in ontogeny and research into the acquisition and development of language provide insights into the rich foundational knowledge on which they build their early mathematical inscriptions. The study conceives of children's mathematical abstractions as emergent cognitive representations, originating in their need to communicate within personally meaningful contexts. The collected ethnographic data comprise mathematical inscriptions from seven children aged three to four years in their nursery school and written observations from their teachers and the first researcher. Analysis follows an interpretive, social-semiotic paradigm; the inscriptions were analysed to show how they convey their emerging mathematical understandings, and how this supports their emergent abstractions. The findings illuminate children's strategies as they communicate their thinking, indicating the importance of symbolic number knowledge in acquiring the abstract graphical language of mathematics.

Related papers

Dijk, E.F., Van Oers, B. & Terwel, J. (2004). Schematising in Early Childhood Mathematics Education: Why, When and How? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12, No. 1,71-83 Print ISSN: 1350-293X, Online ISSN: 1752-1807 http://hdl.handle.net/1871/32860
Jan Terwel

Discussions about the beginnings of mathematics education in early childhood are often caught up in a dilemma: should we stimulate spontaneous actions or provide direct instruction about elementary number-related actions? In this article we argue that either approach is problematic and neither is an optimal way of promoting the development of mathematical thinking. Using a socio-cultural perspective, we propose an emergent approach that integrate both the child’s personal constructions and the educator’s pedagogical responsibilities. From this stance, we conceptualise mathematical thinking as a form of semiotic activity. Early semiotic activity can be identified in schematising activities in early childhood play. Educational important questions are then: What are the arguments for introducing schematising activities in early childhood education? And how can educators organise schematising activities in early childhood education? This article gives an overview of some theoretical and empirical arguments drawn from learning theory and developmental theory. It also provide theory-driven descriptions of exemplary practices that can be seen as promising starting points for early mathematics education.

View PDFchevron_right
Combining historical, foundational, and developmental insights to build children's first steps in mathematics
Ana Millán Gasca

2017

How can we design mathematical instructional activities that reveal children's early mathematical competence in an analogous way as school activities that exploit children's mother language competence? We put forward a list of mathematical conceptions young children may have been taught previously and some subsequent actions developed to observe them and guide their first steps in mathematics in an instructional context. The list has been developed on the basis of insights from modern axiomatic presentation of arithmetic and geometry contrasted with historical results and epistemology of mathematics. We discuss the application of the list in a singular context, a group of eight 3 to 8 year-old Spanish children with Trisomy 21, to show the suitability of this tool for revealing early mathematical competence.

View PDFchevron_right
Children's Developing Mathematics in Collective Practices: A Framework for Analysis
Geoffrey Saxe

Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2002

This article presents a cultural-developmental framework for the analysis of children's mathematics in collective practices and illustrates the heuristic value of the framework through the analysis of videotaped episodes drawn from a middle-school classroom. The framework is presented in 2 related parts. The first targets the children's emerging mathematical goals in collective practices, with a particular focus on the complex role that artifacts play in children's emerging goals. The second part focuses on children's developing mathematics that takes form in their goal-directed activities: (a) Microgenetic analyses concern the process whereby children structure cultural forms like artifacts to serve particular functions as they accomplish emerging mathematical goals; (b) sociogenetic analyses concern the spread or travel of mathematical forms and associated functions within a community of individuals; and (c) ontogenetic analyses concern the interplay between the forms that children use and the functions that they serve over the course of children's development. The analyses of the classroom episodes points to the promise (and limitations) of the framework as a method for furthering our understanding of the interplay between social and developmental processes in children's mathematics.

View PDFchevron_right
Children's talk about mathematics and mathematical talk
Päivi Perkkilä

2007

The relationship between mathematics and language is essential and complex. Language makes a connection between real life and formal mathematics. On the other hand mathematics can be seen as symbolic system. According to radical pedagogical view it is impossible for children to learn mathematics without language and connection to real life. In our paper we will highlight children's talk about mathematics and math talk they expressed in our research project. Children's talk is interpreted in semiotic and narrative spirit. MATHEMATICS AND LANGUAGE Why is Talk important in Mathematics? Whether it is written, drawn, gestured, or spoken, the medium of mathematical expression is human language. Mathematics is a specialized language developed to communicate about particular aspects of the world. Mathematical knowledge develops through interactions and conversations between individuals and community. It is an intensely social activity. A major way of participating in a mathematics community is through talk. Children use language to present their ideas to each other, build theories together, share solution strategies, and generate definitions. By talking both to themselves and to others, children form, speak, test, and revise ideas. (Corwin et. al. 1995.) Talk about mathematics Hersh (1986) has answered to the question "What is mathematics?" as follows: "It would be that mathematics deals with ideas. Not pencil marks or chalk marks, not physical triangles or physical sets, but ideas (which may be presented or suggested by physical objects). What are the main properties of mathematical knowledge, as known to all of us from daily experience? 1) Mathematical objects are invented or created by humans. 2

View PDFchevron_right
The development of young children's mathematical understanding
Bob Perry

Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2004 2007, 2008

Early childhood mathematics education research is burgeoning in Australasia. This chapter highlights and critiques key research in the area that has been published between 2004 and 2007. In particular, it considers specific mathematical topics such as number and numeracy, space and measurement, and structure and patterning; contextual matters such as links among home, school, pri or·to·sch 001 settings and community, indigenous learners and mathematics learning as children start school; assessment of mathematics learning in early childhood settings and the professional development of early childhood teachers of mathematics. It concludes with some suggestions for fruitful areas of future research.

View PDFchevron_right
Mathematical Thinking of Young Children Through the Eyes of Preschool Practitioners
Catherine Pearn

2009

This paper reports on interview responses to 3 questions seeking preschool practitioners’ perceptions of mathematical thinking in very young children. Generally, the interviewees were found to have a good sense of mathematical concepts relevant to babies and toddlers, and they cited evidence of young children’s mathematical development. It is concluded that this practical knowledge provides a strong foundation for further professional development. Mathematics is a core component of cognition, and “robust mathematical learning by all young children is a necessary base for later learning” (Clements, Sarama, & DiBiase, 2003, p. 105). Many researchers have recognised that children bring to school powerful mathematical knowledge, skills and dispositions (e.g., Baroody, 2000; Clarke, Clarke, & Cheeseman, 2006; Ginsburg, Balfanz, & Greenes, 2000), but it is important that people who care for young children and design their activities are also aware of this. It is vital that they can identi...

View PDFchevron_right
Mental images of 48–72-month-old children about the concept of mathematics
fulya ezmeci

Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi

The aim of this study was to find out mental images (metaphors) of 48–72 month old children were receiving preschool education, about the concept of mathematics by using the metaphor technique. This study was a qualitative research study. The following two sets of questions were asked to the children participating in the study and their answers were noted in order to reveal their metaphors about the concept of “mathematics:”, “What do you think mathematics is like? Why?” and “If mathematics were a color, which color do you think it would be? Why?”. The data were analyzed by creating codes and categories. As a result of the research; It was seen that children compared mathematics to paper and pencil even in early childhood education period, when everything needs to be presented by gamification. It was also observed that children formed metaphors for mathematics that contain elements of fear and hate.

View PDFchevron_right
Early Childhood Building Blocks Math Begins in Preschool: Talking the Language of Math
Sally Moomaw
View PDFchevron_right
Mathematical Language in Early Childhood Settings: What Really Counts?
Amani Zaier

Early Childhood Education Journal

Previous research indicates that, prior to entering kindergarten, most children are exposed to some type of formal or direct mathematics instruction. However, the type of mathematical language and the frequency of its use vary greatly in terms of its emphasis on academic content. This study investigated the types and frequency of mathematical language used in six classrooms for children ranging in age from birth to five years. The study site was a quality early childhood setting at a state university in Southwest. Results indicated that utterances pertaining to spatial relations exceeded any other type of mathematical concepts by approximately twice the frequency. In addition, there was a paucity of higher level mathematical concepts observed. These data suggest a need for enhanced attention to higher level mathematical concepts explored in early childhood settings.

View PDFchevron_right
Developing young children's mathematical thinking and understanding
Douglas H Clements

2015

View PDFchevron_right

References (54)

  1. Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & Oost, H. (2006). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42(2), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
  2. BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA. Retrieved from https://www. bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1
  3. Bialystok, E. (1992). The symbolic representation of letters and numbers. Cognitive Development, 7(3), 301- 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)90018-M
  4. Brizuela, B. (2004). Mathematical development in young children: Exploring notations. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  5. Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. London, UK: Dover Publications.
  6. Carruthers, E. (2012). Are the children thinking mathematically? In M. MacAteer (Ed.), Improving primary mathematics: Teaching and learning (pp. 192-212). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  7. Carruthers, E. (2015). Listening to children's mathematics in school. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 313-330). Sydney, Australia: Springer.
  8. Carruthers, E. (in progress) The pedagogy of children's mathematical graphics. Doctoral dissertation: University of Bristol.
  9. Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2005). Making sense of mathematical graphics: The development of understanding abstract symbolism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930585209561
  10. Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2006). Children's mathematics: Making marks, making meaning (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  11. Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2011). Understanding children's mathematical graphics: Beginnings in play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  12. Cassirer, E. (1923). Substance and function and Einstein's theory of relativity. New York, NY: Dover.
  13. Clay, M. (1975). What did I write? Beginning writing behaviour. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  14. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  15. Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0319
  16. Department for Education (DfE), (2017). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. London: DfE. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_ data/file/596629/EYFS_STATUTORY_FRAMEWORK_2017.pdf
  17. Ernest, (2005). Activity and creativity in the semiotics of learning mathematics. In M. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education (pp. 23-34). London, UK: Springer.
  18. Fay, N., Ellison, M., & Garrod, S. (2014). Iconicity: From sign to system in human communication and language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(2), 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay
  19. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Peterborough: Fontana Press.
  20. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (1986). The child's understanding of number (2 nd ed.). Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
  21. Ginsburg, H. (1977). Children's arithmetic. New York, NY: van Nostrand.
  22. Hiebert, J. (1984). Children's mathematical learning: The struggle to link form to understanding. Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1086/461380
  23. Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  24. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Re-thinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
  25. Lancaster, L. (2014). The emergence of symbolic principles: The distribution of mind in early sign making. Biosemiotics, 7(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9195-3
  26. Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  27. MacDonald, A. (2013). Young children's ideas about measurement: What does a kindergarten student consider 'measuring' to be? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(1), 3-7.
  28. Machón, A. (2013). Children's drawings: The genesis and nature of graphic representation. Madrid, Spain: Fibulas Publishers.
  29. Merkley, R., & Ansari, D. (2016). Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: Evidence from brain and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 14-20. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.006
  30. Merritt, D., DeWind, N., & Brannon, E. (2012). Comparative cognition of number recognition. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative cognition (pp. 451-476). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  31. Moffett, P., & Eaton, P. (2018). The impact of the Promoting Early Number Talk project on the development of abstract representation in mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(4), 547- 561. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487166.
  32. Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
  33. Munn, P. (1994). The early development of literacy and numeracy skills. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502939485207491
  34. Munn, P. (1995). The role of organised preschool learning environments in literacy and numeracy development. Research Papers in Education, 10(2), 217-252. https://doi.org/10.1080 /0267152950100207
  35. Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). A measure of emerging print knowledge in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1142-1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.853054
  36. Nunes, T. (1993). The socio-cultural context of mathematical thinking: Research findings and educa- tional implications. In A. J. Bishop, K. Hart, S. Lerman, & T. Nunes (Eds.), Significant influences on children's learning of mathematics (pp. 27-42). Paris: UNESCO.
  37. Pompert, B. (2012). Creating knowledge and practice in the classroom. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Developmental education for young children: Concept, practice and implementation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  38. Presmeg, N. (2006). Semiotics and the Bconnections^standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-3365-z Price, S., Jewitt, C., & Crescenci, L. (2015). The role of iPads in pre-school children's mark making development. Computers in Education, 87, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.003
  39. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2008). Mathematics in early childhood. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on mathematics in early childhood education (pp. 67-94). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  40. Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  41. Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  42. van Oers, B. (2001). Educational forms of initiation in a mathematical culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014031507535
  43. van Oers, B. (2012). Meaningful cultural learning by imitative participation: The case of abstractthinking in primary school. Human Development, 55(1), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339293
  44. VU University. (2014). Ethical review regulations. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University.
  45. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  46. Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. An organismic-developmental approach to the psychology of language. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  47. Williams, S. P. (2008). Final report of the independent review of mathematics teaching in early years settings and primary schools. London, UK: DCSF.
  48. Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press / McGraw-Hill Education.
  49. Worthington, M. (2009). Fish in the water of culture: Signs and symbols in young children's drawing. The Psychology of Education Review, 33(1), 37-46.
  50. Worthington, M. (2018). Funds of knowledge: Children's cultural ways of knowing mathematics. In M.-Y. Lai, T. Muir, & V. Kinnear (Eds.), Forging connections in early mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 239- 258). Singapore: Springer.
  51. Worthington, M., Dobber, M., & van Oers, B. (Submitted). Intertextuality and the advance of mathematisation in young children's inscriptions.
  52. Worthington, M., & van Oers, B. (2016). Pretend play and the cultural foundations of mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293 X.2015.1120520
  53. Worthington, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Children's social literacies: Meaning-making and the emergence of graphical symbols in pretence. International Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 24(1), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415618534
  54. Zaharlick, A. (1992). Ethnography in anthropology and its value for education. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 116- 125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543532

Related papers

Young children’s graphical sign lexicons and the emergence of mathematical symbols
Maulfry Worthington

Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 2020

Young children’s personal repertoires or lexicons of graphical signs comprise multiple and diverse signs. These signs support understanding and progress of the symbolic languages of the culturally established, alphanumerical systems, development evolving early in childhood. Investigating language and inscriptional systems - including drawn, written and mathematical - this evidence-based position paper explores the extent to which children’s graphical sign lexicons support their emergent understandings as they move from intuitive marks and informal signs to formal symbols. These inscriptions are indispensable in communicating ideas, and have significance for the study of young children’s understanding of the abstract symbolic language of mathematics.

View PDFchevron_right
Children as Mathematicians: The Interplay between Discourse Structure, Mathematicising, and the Participatory Approach
Timo K Latomaa

ISRN Education, 2012

This paper investigates the discourse structure, mathematicising and the participatory approach in an early education classroom community whose pedagogy in the learning of mathematics draws on the sociocultural perspective. The social interactions of the classroom community, as well as the role of pre-symbolic sign vehicles as semiotic tools in supporting interaction building, mathematicising, and strategy selection, were subjected to a qualitative micro-level analysis based on applied discourse and semiotic procedures. The results of the study suggest that the young children's mathematical ability develops during the twoyear observation period from nonverbal participation to verbal participation through the following core elements: attention to numeracy, the learning of number words, object counting and mathematical story telling. The iconic and indexical pre-symbolic sign vehicles and semiotic chaining applied in the learning situations provide the learning community with the means to structure their experiences of their everyday practise and to relate them to the culture of mathematicising.

View PDFchevron_right
Making sense of mathematical graphics: The development of understanding abstract symbolism
Elizabeth Carruthers

European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2005

In this paper we develop our theory of Bi-numeracy and show the importance of children's own invented symbolism. Most studies to date have concentrated on the analysis of children's number representations in clinically setup tasks (Hughes, 1986; Sinclair, 1988; Munn, 1994). These studies have added to our knowledge of and understanding of children's mathematical marks. Our research differs in that we based our study in children's homes, nursery and classroom contexts. Rather than being clinical researchers our role has been that of participant observer, based on ethnographic research and grounded theory. We have analysed almost 700 examples of mathematical graphics. These cover all aspects of number and mathematics from the wider mathematics curriculum. They range from child-initiated marks within play to adult-directed sessions in which the children also chose what they wanted to put down on paper. All the samples have come from our own classes or those in which we have been invited to teach. Based on this large sample of original children's marks from authentic teaching situations, our findings are Making Sense of Mathematical Graphics: The Development of

View PDFchevron_right
Young children and Mathematics : A Relook at Mathematical Development from Sociocultural Perspectives
Marcruz Ong

2016

The primary goal of this article is to explore the sociocultural context of young children's mathematical development by reviewing the psychological theories and research, and propose future directions for research on this topic. I begin with a brief history of the early theories of mathematical learning and development, including one of the earliest and influential developmental theories Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. I will then look at two areas of study addressing young children’s mathematical development that challenged Piaget’s theory. One examined the mathematical competencies in infants and young children, while the other investigated the linkage between sociocultural influences and young children’s mathematical development. As this article focuses on the sociocultural context of young children’s mathematical development, I will, therefore, concentrate on the latter

View PDFchevron_right
Schematising in early childhood mathematics education: Why, when and how?
B. Van Oers, Jan Terwel

European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2004

Discussions about the beginnings of mathematics education in early childhood are often caught up in a dilemma: should we stimulate spontaneous actions or provide direct instruction about elementary number-related actions? In this article we argue that either approach is problematic and neither is an optimal way of promoting the development of mathematical thinking. Using a socio-cultural perspective, we propose an emergent approach that integrates both the child's personal constructions and the educator's pedagogical responsibilities. From this stance, we conceptualise mathematical thinking as a form of semiotic activity. Early semiotic activity can be identified in schematising activities in early childhood play. Educationally important questions are then: What are our arguments for introducing schematising activities in early childhood education ? And how can educators organise schematising activities in early childhood education ?

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Curriculum and Pedagogy
  • Usage-based models of language a...
  • Nursery School

    • Cited by

    Teaching Early Mathematical Skills to 3- to 7-Year-Old Children — Differences Related to Mathematical Skill Category, Children’s Age Group and Teachers’ Characteristics
    Merja Koivula

    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

    This study explored teaching early mathematical skills to 3- to 7-year-old children in early childhood education and care (ECEC) and pre-primary education. Teachers in ECEC (N = 206) answered a web survey. The first aim was to determine whether teaching frequency or pedagogical awareness of teaching early mathematical skills varied according to the category of skills (numerical skills, spatial thinking skills and mathematical thinking and reasoning skills) and whether children’s age group moderated these differences. The second aim was to explore to what extent teacher-related characteristics and children’s age group explained variations in teaching frequency concerning early mathematical skills. Results from repeated MANOVAs demonstrated that the frequency and pedagogical awareness of teaching early mathematical skills depended on the skill category and that children’s age group moderated these differences. In 5- to 6-year-olds and 6- to 7-year-olds, numerical skills were taught mo...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Developing ‘deep mathematical thinking’ in geometry with 3- and 4-year-olds: a collaborative study between early years teachers and university-based mathematicians
    David Bolden

    Mathematical Thinking and Learning

    Adam (2022) 'Developing`deep mathematical thinking' in geometry with 3-and 4-year-olds: A collaborative study between early years teachers and University-based mathematicians.', Mathematical Thinking and Learning .

    View PDFchevron_right
    Mathematical Signs and Their Cultural Transmission in Pretend Play
    Maulfry Worthington

    STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum, 2020

    Mathematics is a critical aspect of early childhood curricula and integral to competency in all STEM subjects. Developed historically, the abstract symbolic language of mathematics is a powerful cultural phenomenon. Using a genetic approach to research the beginning mathematical inscriptions of 3-4-year-olds has highlighted their meaning-based symbol use as children move towards the formal, "higher psychological functions" (Vygotsky, 1978, p. 46). Underpinned by Vygotsky's socio-cultural and social-semiotic theories, this chapter considers from whom and how young children learn the mathematical signs of the established cultural system of mathematics. It investigates intertextuality and modes of cultural transmission, the social learning mechanisms of imitation and emulation whereby teachers, other adults and children transmit cultural knowledge. The findings show the potential of rich pretend play for learning including peer-to-peer natural pedagogy, highlighting the importance of an effective early learning culture and underscoring the extent to which social learning is paramount for mathematics.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved