Random-tiling quasicrystal in three dimensions
1990, Physical Review Letters
https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.64.2390Abstract
A three-dimensional random-tiling icosahedral quasicrystal is studied by a Monte Carlo simulation. The hypothesis of long-range positional order in the system is confirmed through analysis of the finitesize scaling behavior of phason fluctuations and Fourier peak intensities. By investigating the diffuse scattering we determine the phason stiffness constants. A finite-size scaling form for the Fourier intensity near an icosahedral reciprocal wave vector is proposed.
FAQs
AI
What stabilizes the high-temperature phase of a random-tiling quasicrystal?
The study reveals that the high-temperature phase is stabilized by entropy due to random tiling configurations. This finding aligns with earlier arguments from Henley and Widom regarding configurational entropy's role.
How does the phason stiffness compare in icosahedral quasicrystals?
Phason stiffness constants determined in the study are K₁=96 and K₂=59. These values indicate notable resistance to phason fluctuations, influencing diffraction characteristics.
What evidence supports the existence of long-range positional order in the system?
The research confirms long-range positional order through verification of 1/L scaling forms. This result supports the hypothesis of Bragg diffraction peaks in the random-tiling model.
How was Monte Carlo simulation utilized in studying random-tiling quasicrystals?
Monte Carlo simulations of cubic approximants were performed to explore phason relaxation dynamics. The simulations involved 300-500 different systems subjected to periodic boundary conditions.
What implications arise from comparing phason fluctuations across different temperatures?
The findings suggest that lower temperatures can lead to energy-driven crystalline states, contrasting the random-tiling model's entropy stability. This raises questions about phase transitions in quasicrystals influenced by local energetics.
References (15)
- Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, 4630 Bochum, Federal Republic of Germany. 'A. P. Tsai, A. Inoue, and T. Masumoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1505 (1987).
- A. Guryan, A. I. Goldman, P. W. Stephens, K. Hiraga, A. P. Tsai, A. Inoue, and T. Masumoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2409 (1989).
- Calvayrac, A. Quivy, M. Bessiere, S. Lefebvre, M. Cornier-Quiquandon, and D. Gratias, J. Phys. (Paris) 51, 417 (1990).
- Bancel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2741 (1989).
- L. Henley, in Quasicrystals and Incommensurate Struc tures in Condensed Matter, edited by M. J. Yacaman, D. Romeu, V. Castano, and A. Gomez (World Scientific, Singa- pore, 1989);
- M. Widom, in Anniversary Adriatico Research Conference on Quasierystals, edited by M. V. Jaric and S. Lundqvist (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990). sV. Elser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1730 (1985).
- L. Henley, J. Phys. A 21, 1649 (1988).
- M. Widom, D.-P. Deng, and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 310 (1989).
- D. Levine and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2477 (1984).
- ' K. J. Strandburg, L.-H. Tang, and M. V. Jaric, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 314 (1989).
- ''D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).
- ' P. W. Stephens and A. I. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1168 (1986).
- See, e.g. , D. Levine, T. C. Lubensky, S. Ostlund, S. Rama- swamy, P. J. Steinhardt, and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1520 (1985).
- M. V. Jaric and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 37, 4458 (1988). ' Our e, and e, differ from those of Ref. 14 by a factor of Ez. ' In general, one may expect a to depend on the average phason strain which is necessarily present in a finite system un- der periodic boundary conditions. This dependence is responsi- ble for the nonmonotonic behavior seen in Fig. 2. ' Despite a dense set of scattering peaks for a quasicrystal of infinite size, the intensity of the spots sufficiently close to a given peak may be much weaker than the diffuse intensity in a given finite system, as seen in Fig. 1. 'SV. Elser, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4892 (1985). ' The icosahedral quasicrystal peaks along this axis are shift- ed only radially in a cubic approximant. J. E. S. Socolar, T. L. Lubensky, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3345 (1986).
- 'L. -H. Tang and M. V. Jaric, Phys. Rev. B 41, 4524 (1990).