Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
This Study
Method
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Data Processing
Results
Discussion
References
All Topics
Psychology
Cognitive Science

Development of Phonetic Contrasts in Cantonese Tone Acquisition

Profile image of Peggy MokPeggy Mok

2019, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00152
visibility

…

description

14 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Purpose Previous studies showed both early and late acquisition of Cantonese tones based on transcription data using different criteria, but very little acoustic data were reported. Our study examined Cantonese tone acquisition using both transcription and acoustic data, illustrating the early and protracted aspects of Cantonese tone acquisition. Method One hundred fifty-nine Cantonese-speaking children aged between 2;1 and 6;0 (years;months) and 10 reference speakers participated in a tone production experiment based on picture naming. Natural production materials with 30 monosyllabic words were transcribed by two native judges. Acoustic measurements included overall tonal dispersion and specific contrasts between similar tone pairs: ratios of average fundamental frequency height for the level tones (T1, T3, T6), magnitude of rise and inflection point for the rising tones (T2, T5), magnitude of fall, H1*–H2*, and harmonic-to-noise ratio for the low tones (T4, T6). Auditory assessme...

Related papers

The acquisition of lexical tones by Cantonese-English bilingual children
Peggy Mok

Journal of Child Language, 2018

Previous studies on bilingual children found intact tonal development at the initial stages of interaction between Cantonese and English in successive bilingual children, whereas children exposed to both languages from birth have not been studied in this regard. We examined the production of Cantonese tones by five simultaneous bilingual children longitudinally at 2;0 and 2;6, and compared them with age-matched monolingual children using auditory analysis. Our results showed that some bilingual children had a delay at 2;0, compared to their monolingual peers. Some bilingual children also exhibited a 'high-low' template in their production, resembling the pitch pattern of English trochaic words. These findings suggest a possible early interaction of the Cantonese and English prosodic systems in which bilingual children adopted the English stress pattern in Cantonese production. The time-point along the trajectory of phonological development is important in modulating whether cross-linguistic transfer can be observed.

View PDFchevron_right
A preliminary study on Cantonese tone production by young heritage speakers
Peggy Mok

Proceedings of the 10th Speech Prosody , 2020

This study investigated the production of six Cantonese tones by heritage language (HL) children in Vancouver, Canada. Twenty-five Cantonese heritage speakers (HSs) aged between 2;1 and 6;0 participated in the production experiment. Data collected from children in Hong Kong (homeland) at the same ages and native speakers aged between 15;09 and 16;07 were included for analysis. Results showed that HSs have not fully acquired all six lexical tones, in particular the tonal contrasts, by 6;0. HL children's overall pattern of the pitch contours was similar to that of homeland children, but with smaller tonal distinctions between similar tone pairs relative to reference speakers. An ongoing tone merging phenomenon appeared among the observed HL children. More interestingly, a "high-low" template, resembling the pitch pattern of English trochaic words, was found in the production of two HL children respectively at age 3;1 and 5;0. These findings are consistent with the idea that language variation exists in the acquisition of HL. Furthermore, the onset of schooling leads to the shift in language dominance from the HL to the majority language, which influences the production of HL.

View PDFchevron_right
Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers
Alexander Francis

Journal of Phonetics, 2008

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

View PDFchevron_right
Perception and production of Cantonese tones by South Asians in Hong Kong
Crystal Lee, Peggy Mok

Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 2018

This study investigates the perception and production of Hong Kong Cantonese tones by South Asians residing in Hong Kong. Forty-three South Asian participants and twenty-six ethnic Chi-nese Hong Kong Cantonese speakers completed an AX discrimination task and a picture naming task. A series of regression analyses showed that, relative to the Chinese cohort, the South Asian cohort showed significant neutralization of tonal contrasts in production, as well as poorer tonal discrimination accuracy, especially among participants whose dominant language is Punjabi, which also has contrastive tones in its phonology. These findings are consistent with predictions of existing models of L2 phonetic acquisition, which argue that the hardest elements in L2 phonology for learners are those bearing similar features from their L1, rather than those that are different.

View PDFchevron_right
Chinese and English infants' tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization
Karen Mattock

Infancy, 2006

View PDFchevron_right
Discrimination of Cantonese Tones by Speakers of Tone and Non-tone Languages
Zhen Qin, Peggy Mok

Volume 34 (2014), Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2014

Listeners often find some non-native sounds difficult to perceive. For example, lexical tones in Chinese languages are difficult for non-native listeners to perceive, although pitch is frequently used in their first language (L1) and is not unfamiliar to them. We conduct a cross-linguistic study to explore the factors contributing to the difficulty of tone perception for non-native listeners

View PDFchevron_right
Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison
Douglas Vakoch

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1996

This study investigated the effects of linguistic experience on tone perception. Both Cantonese (in Experiment 1) and Mandarin (in Experiment 2) tones, including both lexical and nonlexical tones, were presented to three groups of subjects: Cantonese, Mandarin, and English native speakers. Subjects were asked to determine whether two auditorily presented tones were the same or different. The interval between the presentation of the two tones, and the level of interference during this interval, were manipulated. Native speakers did better at discriminating tones from their own languages than the other two groups of subjects, for both lexical and nonlexical tones. Subjects did worst when they were required to count backward during the interstimulus interval. Cantonese speakers were better than both Mandarin and English speakers at discriminating Cantonese tones, and there was no difference between Mandarin and English speakers, except in one condition. Mandarin speakers did better than both Cantonese and English speakers, and Cantonese speakers did better than English speakers, at discriminating Mandarin tones. Results are discussed in terms of the effects of language background, differences between Cantonese and Mandarin tones, and the nature of encoding in short-term memory.

View PDFchevron_right
A Comparison of Low and Middle Level Tones in Cantonese with Tones in Mandarin Chinese
Pertti Nikkilä

2014

L'objectif de l'article est une recherche des mots chinois mandarin prononces avec des tons moyens et bas que l'on retrouveraient en cantonais. La comparaison de prononciation entre les deux dialectes met en evidence une certaine correspondance de tons. Ainsi l'auteur propose d'etudier les quatre correspondances regulieres - mais non systematiques - mises en evidence par cette etude : 1. les tons hauts descendants du cantonais correspondent aux tons haut du mandarin, 2. les tons bas descendants du cantonais correspondent aux tons hauts ascendants du mandarin 3. les tons bas et haut montants du cantonais correspondent aux tons bas montants du mandarins et, enfin, 4. les tons moyens et bas du cantonais correspondent aux tons descendants du mandarin

View PDFchevron_right
A New System of Cantonese Tones? Tone Perception and Production in Hong Kong South Asian Cantonese
Peggy Mok

Language and Speech, 2022

Studies in language contact have identified many instances of linguistic variation and grammatical innovations introduced by speakers from multi-ethnic urban neighborhoods. This study focuses on the variety of Cantonese spoken by South Asian youths in Hong Kong, specifically their production and perception of Hong Kong Cantonese tones. Our findings show that the South Asian Cantonese speakers have a smaller tonal inventory than the canonical six-tone system of standard Hong Kong Cantonese and their tonal discrimination abilities are also more impoverished relative to their ethnic Chinese peers. Further analysis shows a positive correlation between tonal discrimination accuracy and tonal realization distinctness among the South Asian speakers, but not among the ethnic Chinese. These findings suggest that South Asian Cantonese speakers might have developed a distinct tone system from their ethnic Chinese peers.

View PDFchevron_right
How Pitch Moves: Production of Cantonese Tones by Speakers with Different Tonal Experiences
Rikke Bundgaard-Nielsen

Tonal Aspects of Languages 2016, 2016

This study investigates how native prosodic systems as well as L2 learning experience shape non-native tone production in terms of tone movement, a primary cue to tone identity. In an imitation task, the six Cantonese tones were produced by four speaker groups: native Mandarin speakers (tonal), native English speakers (non-tonal), native English speakers with Mandarin learning experience (L2 tonal) and native Cantonese speakers (control group). The results indicate that native prosodic systems influence non-native tone production: Mandarin speakers are more accurate on pitch contour than pitch height while English speakers perform better on level tones than contour ones. Furthermore, L2 tonal experience assists L3 tone production, as English-speaking Mandarin learners produce Cantonese tones in the most native-like shape, outperforming both Mandarin and English speakers.

View PDFchevron_right

References (52)

  1. Alan, C. L. (2007). Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology, 24(1), 187-214.
  2. Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Mouton de Gruyter.
  3. Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by com- puter. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341-345.
  4. Burnham, D. (2003). Language specific speech perception and the onset of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 573-609.
  5. Burnham, D., Tsukada, K., Jones, C., Rungrojsuwan, S., Krachaikiat, N., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2006). The development of lexical tone production in Thai children, 18 months to 6 years: Rela- tionships with language milestones? In H. C. Yehia, D. Demolin & R. Laboissière (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, (pp. 107). Cefala.
  6. Chao, Y. R. (1947). Cantonese primer. Greenwood Press.
  7. Chen, F., Peng, G., Yan, N., & Wang, L. (2017). The development of categorical perception of Mandarin tones in four-to seven-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 44(6), 1413-1434.
  8. Cheung, P. S. P., Ng, A., & To, C. K. S. (2006). Hong Kong Cantonese Articulation Test (HKCAT). Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
  9. Ciocca, V., & Lui, J. (2003). The development of lexical tone perception in Cantonese. Journal of Multilingual Communica- tion Disorders, 1(2), 141-147.
  10. Clumeck, H. (1980). The acquisition of tone. In G. H. Yeni- Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Production (pp. 257-275). Academic Press.
  11. Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Methodological questions in studying consonant acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(12), 937-956.
  12. Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Munson, B. (2015). Cross-language differences in acquisition. In M. A. Redford (Ed.), The hand- book of speech production (pp. 530-554). Wiley.
  13. Flynn, C.-Y.-C. (2003). Intonation in Cantonese. Lincom.
  14. Gandour, J. (1981). Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9(1), 20-36.
  15. Gandour, J., Potisuk, S., & Dechongkit, S. (1994). Tonal coarticu- lation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics, 22(4), 477-492.
  16. Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R. (2004). Reexamining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 621-632.
  17. Garellek, M. (2019). The phonetics of voice. In W. F. Katz & P. F. Assmann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics (Chap. 4). Routledge.
  18. Hung, Y. C., Meredith, G. S., & Gill, S. V. (2013). Influence of dual task constraints during walking for children. Gait & Posture, 38(3), 450-454.
  19. Iseli, M., Shue, Y.-L., & Alwan, A. (2007). Age, sex, and vowel de- pendencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2283-2295.
  20. Keating, P., Garellek, M., & Kreiman, J. (2015). Acoustic proper- ties of different kinds of creaky voice. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015) (pp. 0821.1-0821.5). The University of Glasgow.
  21. Khouw, E., & Ciocca, V. (2007). Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones. Journal of Phonetics, 35(1), 104-117.
  22. Kuang, J. (2017). Covariation between voice quality and pitch: Revisiting the case of Mandarin creaky voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(3), 1693-1706.
  23. Lee, K. Y. S. (2012). The Cantonese Tone Identification Test (CANTIT). Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  24. Lee, K. Y. S., Chan, K. T. Y., Lam, J. H. S., Van Hasselt, C. A., & Tong, M. C. F. (2015). Lexical tone perception in native speakers of Cantonese. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(1), 53-62.
  25. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of tone in Man- darin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4(2), 185-199.
  26. Mattock, K., & Burnham, D. (2006). Chinese and English infants' tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10(3), 241-265.
  27. Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106(3), 1367-1381.
  28. Mok, P., & Zuo, D. (2012). The separation between music and speech: Evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(4), 2711-2720.
  29. Mok, P., Zuo, D., & Wong, P. (2013). Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 341-370.
  30. Mok, P. P. K., Fung, H. S. H., & Li, G. V. (2019). Assessing the link between perception and production in Cantonese tone acquisition. Journal of Speech, Langauge, and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1243-1257.
  31. Munson, B., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2011). Phonological representations in language acquisition: Climbing the ladder of abstraction. In A. C. Cohn, C. Fougeron, & M. K. Huffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 288-209). Oxford University Press.
  32. Rose, P. (2004). The acoustics and probabilistic phonology of short-stopped syllable tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. In S. Cassidy, F. Cox, R. Mannell & S. Palethorpe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology (pp. 445-450). Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
  33. Scobbie, J. E., Gibbon, F., Hardcastle, W. J., & Fletcher, P. (2000). Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. In M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Language acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Singh, L., & Fu, C. S. L. (2016). A new view of language develop- ment: The acquisition of lexical tone. Child Development, 87(3), 834-854.
  35. So, L. K. H., & Dodd, B. (1995). The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 473-495.
  36. To, C. K. S., Cheung, P. S. P., & McLeod, S. (2013). A popula- tion study of children's acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese consonants, vowels and tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 103-122.
  37. Tse, J. K. P. (1978). Tone acquisition in Cantonese: A longitudi- nal case study. Journal of Child Language, 5(2), 191-204.
  38. Wong, M. (1982). Tone change in Cantonese (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  39. Wong, P. C. M., & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Perceptual normalization for inter-and intra-talker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(2), 413-421.
  40. Wong, P. S. (2012). Acoustic characteristics of three-year-olds' correct and incorrect monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone productions. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 141-151.
  41. Wong, P. S. (2013). Perceptual evidence for protracted develop- ment in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 434-443.
  42. Wong, P. S., & Chan, H. Y. (2018). Acoustic characteristics of highly distinguishable Cantonese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(2), 765-779.
  43. Wong, P. S., Fu, W. M., & Cheung, E. Y. L. (2017). Cantonese- speaking children do not acquire tone perception before tone production-A perceptual and acoustic study of three-year- olds' monosyllabic tones. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1450.
  44. Wong, P. S., & Leung, C. T.-T. (2018). Suprasegmental features are not acquired early: Perception and production of mono- syllabic Cantonese lexical tones in 4-to 6-year-old preschool children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1070-1085.
  45. Wu, J. H., Ajisafe, T., & Beerse, M. (2015). Children display adult-like kinetic patterns in the time domain, but not in the frequency domain, while walking with ankle load. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 31(5), 292-308.
  46. Xu Rattanasone, N., Attina, V., Kasisopa, B., & Burnham, D. (2013). How to compare tones. In H. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 233-246). Cambridge University Press.
  47. Complimentary Author PDF: Not for Broad Dissemination Xu, Y. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25(1), 61-83.
  48. Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro-A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013) (pp. 7-10).
  49. Yu, K., & Lam, H. W. (2014). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tone perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320-1333.
  50. Zhao, Y., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard reflex on tone hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 37(2), 231-247.
  51. Zhu, H. (2002). Phonological development in specific contexts: Studies of Chinese-speaking children. Multilingual Matters.
  52. Zhu, H., & Dodd, B. (2000). The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (modern standard Chinese). Journal of Child Lan- guage, 27(1), 3-24.

Related papers

Assessing the Link Between Perception and Production in Cantonese Tone Acquisition
Peggy Mok

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2019

Purpose: Previous studies showed early production precedes late perception in Cantonese tone acquisition, contrary to the general principle that perception precedes production in child language. How tone production and perception are linked in 1st language acquisition remains largely unknown. Our study revisited the acquisition of tone in Cantonese-speaking children, exploring the possible link between production and perception in 1st language acquisition. Method: One hundred eleven Cantonese-speaking children aged between 2;0 and 6;0 (years;months) and 10 adolescent reference speakers participated in tone production and perception experiments. Production materials with 30 monosyllabic words were transcribed in filtered and unfiltered conditions by 2 native judges. Perception accuracy was based on a 2-alternative forced-choice task with pictures covering all possible tone pair contrasts. Results: Children's accuracy of production and perception of all the 6 Cantonese tones was still not adultlike by age 6;0. Both production and perception accuracies matured with age. A weak positive link was found between the 2 accuracies. Mother's native language contributed to children's production accuracy. Conclusions: Our findings show that production and perception abilities are associated in tone acquisition. Further study is needed to explore factors affecting production accuracy in children. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7960826.

View PDFchevron_right
The acoustic analysis of tone differentiation as a means for assessing tone production in speakers of Cantonese
Johanna Barry

2004

This paper reports on a methodology for acoustically analyzing tone production in Cantonese. F0 offset versus F0 onset are plotted for a series of tokens for each of the six tones in the language. These are grouped according to tone type into a set of six ellipses. Qualitative visual observations regarding the degree of differentiation of the ellipses within the tonal space are summarized numerically using two indices, referred to here as Index 1 and Index 2. Index 1 is a ratio of the area of the speaker's tonal space and the average of the areas of the ellipses of the three target tones making up the tonal space. Index 2 is a ratio of the average distance between all six tonal ellipses and the average of the sum of the two axes for all six tone ellipses. Using this methodology, tonal differentiation is compared for three groups of speakers; normally hearing adults; normally hearing children aged from 4 -6 years; and, prelinguistically deafened cochlear implant users aged from 4 -11 years. A potential conundrum regarding how tone production abilities can outstrip tone perception abilities is explained using the data from the acoustic analyses. It is suggested that young children of the age range tested are still learning to normalize for pitch level differences in tone production. Acoustic analysis of the data thus supports results from tone perception studies and suggests that the methodology is suitable for use in studies investigating tone production in both clinical and research contexts.

View PDFchevron_right
Tone and vowel enhancement in Cantonese infant-directed speech at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age
Ronan Reilly

Journal of Phonetics, 2013

Vowel and tone hyperarticulation were investigated in infant-directed speech (IDS) in Cantonese, a tone language. Native Cantonese speaking mothers were recorded speaking to their infants on four occasions, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Unexpectedly, no vowel hyperarticulation in terms of vowel triangle areas or in the dimensions of tongue height or backness (F1 and F2 values) was found in IDS compared to adult-directed speech (ADS). Tone hyperarticulation in IDS, as indexed by the relative area of tone triangles in f0 onset and f0 offset space compared to those in ADS, was found in IDS to infants at all four ages but was reduced somewhat in 12-montholds. Given that infants' perceptual attunement to lexical tone begins around 4 months, it appears that parents' tone hyperarticulation begins before infants have perceptually tuned into native tones and begins to decline by the end of the first year. This provides support for the hypothesis that tone hyperarticulation serves as a bootstrapping mechanism in early language development in tone languages.

View PDFchevron_right
A Population Study of Children’s Acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese Consonants, Vowels, and Tones
Carol To

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2013

Purpose This study investigated children’s acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese. Method Participants were 1,726 children ages 2;4 to 12;4 (years;months). Single-word speech samples were collected to examine 4 measures: initial consonants, final consonants, vowels/diphthongs, and lexical tones. A 2-way analysis of variance was performed to examine the effects of age and sex on phoneme acquisition. Results There was rapid acquisition of initial consonants from age 2;6 to age 4;6. All 19 initial consonants were acquired by age 6;0 (90% criterion): /p-/, /m-/, and /j-/ were acquired the earliest; the last were /ts h -/ and /s-/. Final consonants had a different acquisition time from their initial counterparts. Vowels were acquired by age 5;0 and diphthongs by age 4;0. All 9 tones were acquired by age 2;6. The main effect of age was significant for all 4 measures, whereas sex was significant for all measures except tone. Common phonological patterns (≥ 10%) for initial consonants were stop...

View PDFchevron_right
Cantonese tone production in pre-school Urdu–Cantonese bilingual minority children
Roxana Fung

International Journal of Bilingualism, 2019

Aim: In this study, we examine the production of Cantonese tones by preschool Urdu–Cantonese children living in Hong Kong. Methodology: 21 first language Urdu second language Cantonese children (ages 4–6) and 20 age-matched first language Cantonese children participated in a picture-naming experiment with 86 words (109 syllables in total). Data and Analysis: Acoustic analysis was carried out for perceptually correct and incorrect tone productions of each tone. Comparisons were also made across speaker groups regarding accuracy rates and error patterns. Findings: Overall, first-language Urdu participants had lower accuracy and greater tone confusion than first language Cantonese participants. The pattern is attributable to influence from Urdu prosody, ongoing Cantonese tone mergers, and general sensitivity to phonetic information. Originality: This is the first empirical study on the acquisition of Cantonese tones by children who are heritage speakers of a non-tone language. Signific...

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved