Towards recognition of Lifelong Learning
2017
https://doi.org/10.12795/9788447221042…
50 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Abdelnour, G. A., Abouchedid, K., Aguayo, M., Bakkali, M., Baroud, F., Belhani, A., ... Ykhlef, N. (2017). Towards recognition of Lifelong Learning. In J. B. Govantes Romero, & E. Mellado Duran (Eds.), EURO-MEDITERRANEAN INTEGRATION THROUGH LIFELONG LEARNING (EU-MILL): A memory of cooperation and dialogue on Education in the Mediterranean basin (pp. 79-121). (Divulgacion Cientifica). Universidad de Sevilla. https://doi.org/10.12795/9788447221042
Related papers
Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2018
Aim. The aim of article is to present the changing of idea of lifelong learning. The article focuses on the idea of lifelong learning. The rst part shows the essence of lifelong learning. An attempt has been made to organise concepts such as lifelong learning, lifelong training, continuing education and permanent education, as well as education and adult education, to consequently educe the idea of lifelong learning from the concept of continuing education. Methods. The method used is the literature analysis because of the theoretical character of a paper. Results. In the paper, it is presented how idea of lifelong learning was changing over time. Furthermore, the article shows the social context of the use of lifelong learning in relation to the theory of human capital and social capital theory as well. The next part of the article concentrates on identifying the most important initiatives of the European Union, the objective of which is the implementation of the idea in Europe. The article presents the aims of the EU programmes that are focused on the implementation of that idea in European education. Conclusions. The development of the idea of lifelong learning is related to a social and cultural changes. This idea is a very important part of EU strategy, which main gol is to build the Information Society.
Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2005
This paper provides a critical analysis of the EU's Memorandum on lifelong learning in light of the evolution of the concepts of lifelong education and lifelong learning from the late sixties onward. It also analyses this document in light of the forces of globalisation that impinge on educational policymaking in Europe as well as the all-pervasive neo-liberal ideology. The paper moves from theory to practice to provide critical considerations concerning certain 'on the ground' projects being presented as 'best practice' in EU documents. It brings out the neo-liberal tenets that underlie much of the thinking and rationale for these projects, and indicates, in the process, how much of the old UNESCO discourse of lifelong education has been distorted to accommodate capitalism's contemporary needs. An alternative conception of lifelong learning is called for.
CONTINUOUS EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2013
RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 2011
The importance of lifelong learning is beyond question in any working context and especially so under the circumstances of today's global recession. Consequently, in the current European Higher Education Area (EHEA), continuing education tendencies and plans acquire a global dimension that overcomes-or should overcome-reductionist approaches. The construction and development of the European Area of lifelong learning (EAll) (Commission of the European Communities, 2001a), should be understood as a process that is embedded in a much broader framework. It is a networked action in which the involvement of many active professional stakeholders is required, and in which convergence, recognition and cohesion are the principal qualitative components. Following an exhaustive review of original and official documents linked to the origin, foundations and construction of the EHEA, the EAll stands out as a challenge within the context of the EHEA as a whole. In the aforementioned review, lifelong learning is conceived on the basis of the free
International Review of Education, 2014
International Review of Education
2010
At the Lisbon European Council (March 2000), the governments representatives set a fundamental objective for the EU, to be accomplished until 2010: to become “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustained economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion”. A central element of this strategy is lifelong learning, not only to competitiveness and employability, but also to social inclusion, active citizenship and personal developmen. In a Communication from the European Commission, adopted on November 21, 2001, it is formulated the common goal of a European Area of Lifelong Learning. Its aim is ”to empower citizens to move freely between learning settings, jobs, regions and countries, making the most of their knowledge and competences, and to meet the goals and ambitions of the European Union and the candidate countries to be more prosperous, inclusive, tolerant and democratic”. The achievement of this goal demands the e...
2009
Since the mid 1990s, lifelong learning has become an extremely fashionable concept. Of course, the idea is not a new one. One leading British adult educator was already writing in 1920 on the topic of “education as a lifelong process”(Yeaxlee 1920: 25). Yet although there is a long standing recognition that learning is a process that continues beyond formal schooling, the level of interest in lifelong learning has shot up since the early 1970s, and in particular since the late 1990s.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.