Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice

https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439

Abstract

Anonymising qualitative research data can be challenging, especially in highly sensitive contexts such as catastrophic brain injury and end-of-life decision-making. Using examples from in-depth interviews with family members of people in vegetative and minimally conscious states, this article discusses the issues we faced in trying to maximise participant anonymity alongside maintaining the integrity of our data. We discuss how we developed elaborate, context-sensitive strategies to try to preserve the richness of the interview material wherever possible while also protecting participants. This discussion of the practical and ethical details of anonymising is designed to add to the largely theoretical literature on this topic and to be of illustrative use to other researchers confronting similar dilemmas.

References (36)

  1. Baez B (2002) Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research 2(1): 35-58.
  2. Breen LJ (2007) The researcher 'in the middle': negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy. Australian Community Psychologist 19(1): 163-174.
  3. British Sociological Association (BSA) (2002) Statement of ethical practice. Available at: http:// www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx (accessed 30 August 2014). Canadian Sociological Association (CSA) (2012) Statement of professional ethics. Available at: http://www.csa-scs.ca/files/www/csa/documents/codeofethics/2012Ethics.pdf (accessed 30 August 2014).
  4. Cassell J and Jacobs SE (1987) Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology. Washington, DC: The American Anthropological Association.
  5. Clark A (2006) Anonymising Research Data. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Real Life Methods Working Paper Series. Manchester: Real Life Methods. Available at: http:// eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/480/1/0706_anonymising_research_data.pdf (accessed 31 August 2014).
  6. Clough A and Conigrave K (2008) Managing confidentiality in illicit drugs research: ethical and legal lessons from studies in remote Aboriginal communities. Internal Medicine Journal 38: 60-63.
  7. Corden A and Sainsbury R (2006) Exploring 'quality': Research participants' perspectives on verbatim quotations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9(2): 97-110.
  8. Ellis C (1986) Fisher Folk: Two Communities on Chesapeake Bay. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
  9. Ellis C (1995) Emotional and ethical quagmire in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24: 68-98.
  10. ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) (2012) Framework for research ethics. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/about-esrc/information/research-ethics.aspx (accessed 30 August 2014).
  11. Giordano J, et al. (2007) Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research par- ticipants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research 17(2): 264-275.
  12. Grinyer A (2002) The anonymity of research participants: assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update 36: 1-4.
  13. Halliday S, Kitzinger C and Kitzinger J (2014) Law in everyday life and death: a socio-legal study of chronic disorders of consciousness. Legal Studies Epub ahead of print 19 February 2014. DOI:10.1111/lest.12042.
  14. Holland S, Kitzinger C and Kitzinger J (2014) Death, treatment decisions and the permanent veg- etative state. Medical Health Care and Philosophy 17: 413-423. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-013- 9540-y.
  15. Hopkins M (1993) Is anonymity possible? Writing about refugees in the United States. In: Brettell C (ed) When They Read What We Write: The Politics of Ethnography. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, 121-129.
  16. Kaiser K (2009) Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 19(11): 1632-1641.
  17. Kelly A (2009) In defence of anonymity: rejoining the criticism. British Educational Research Journal 35(3): 431-445.
  18. Kitzinger C and Kitzinger J (2011) 'M', Polly and the right to die. Bioethics Forum. Posted 12 October 2011. Available at: http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post. aspx?id=5557 (accessed 31 August 2014).
  19. Kitzinger C and Kitzinger J (2014) Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives. Journal of Medical Ethics. Epub ahead of print 14 January 2014. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101799.
  20. Kitzinger J and Kitzinger C (2013) The 'window of opportunity' for death after severe brain injury: family experiences. Sociology of Health & Illness 35(7): 1095-1112.
  21. Kitzinger J and Samuel G (2014) A response to Naccache's comment on 'Reporting conscious- ness in coma'. JOMEC Journal: Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. Available at: http:// www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/jomecjournal/3-june2013/Kitzinger_Samuel_Naccache.pdf (accessed 31 August 2014).
  22. Moore N (2012) The politics and ethics of naming: questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(4): 331-340.
  23. Nespor J (2000) Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 6(4): 546-569.
  24. Nettleton S, Kitzinger J and Kitzinger C (2014) A diagnostic illusory? The case of distinguish- ing between 'vegetative' and 'minimally conscious' states. Social Science & Medicine 116: 134-141. DOI 10.1007/s11019-013-9540-y
  25. Parry O and Mauthner N (2004) Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal, and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology 38(1): 139-152.
  26. Samuel G and Kitzinger J (2013) Reporting consciousness in coma: media framing of neuro- scientific research, hope, and the response of families with relatives in vegetative and mini- mally conscious states. JOMEC Journal: Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/jomecjournal/3-june2013/Kitzinger_Samuel_coma.pdf (accessed 31 August 2014).
  27. Saunders B, Kitzinger J and Kitzinger C (2014) Participant anonymity in the internet age: from the- ory to practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2014.948697
  28. Scheper-Hughes N (2000) Ire in Ireland. Ethnography 1(1): 117-140.
  29. Scott C (2005) Anonymity in applied communication research: tensions between IRBs, research- ers, and human subjects. Journal of Applied Communication Research 33(3): 242-25.
  30. Svalastog AL and Eriksson S (2010) You can use my name; you don't have to steal my story -a critique of anonymity in indigenous studies. Developing World Bioethics 10(2): 104-110.
  31. Taylor J (2011) The intimate insider: negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research 11(1): 3-22.
  32. Tilley L and Woodthorpe K (2011) Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical exami- nation of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research 11(2): 197-212.
  33. Tolich M (2004) Internal confidentiality: when confidentiality assurances fail relational inform- ants. Qualitative Sociology 27(1): 101-106.
  34. UK Data Service (Qualidata) (2013) Create and manage data: anonymisation. Available at: http:// ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-data/legal-ethical/anonymisation.aspx (accessed 30 August 2014). Van Den Hoonaard W (2003) Is anonymity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of Academic Ethics 1(2): 141-151.
  35. Walford G (2005) Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 28(1): 83-93.
  36. Wiles R, et al. (2012) Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, 'voice' and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(1): 41-53.