Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Culturally Responsive Education

2017, Culturally Responsive Education

Abstract

This study focuses on gender and home economics education in the contexts of Ghana and Finland. The aim is to identify potential opportunities to understand how home economics education can promote gender equality in society. This research analyses how homeeconomics teacher students at two universities perceive gender in relation to home economics education, particularly in basic-level education, and how they assess the potential of home economics education to advance gender equality in their respective contexts. The data were drawn from Finnish teacher students' (N=16) online discussions during a course on gender and home economics and from two focus group discussions with Ghanaian home-economics teacher students (N=16) and subjected to qualitative content analysis. Instead of highlighting the gender-related differences in the Ghanaian and Finnish cultural contexts, the focus is on investigating students' understanding of the prevalent gender roles and structures.

References (55)

  1. Aalto, K. (2014). Arjen rytmit perhe-elämän muutoskohdissa 1979-2009 [Rythm of everyday life in family transitions 1979─2009].
  2. In P. Korvela & T. Tuomi-Gröhn (eds.). Arjen rakentuminen ja rytmit perhe-elämän käännekohdissa. Helsinki: Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus, pp. 46-75.
  3. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. G. Fox (ed.). Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 137-154.
  4. Adinkrah, M. (2012). Better dead than dishonored: Masculinity and male suicidal behavior in contemporary Ghana. Social science & medicine, 74(4), 474-481.
  5. Ampofo, A. A. (2001). "When Men Speak Women Listen": Gender Socialisation and Young Adolescents' Attitudes to Sexual and Reproductive Issues. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 196─212.
  6. Agyare-Kwabi, P. (2013). Gender, social inclusion (GESI) and education in Ghana. Policy Brief. UKAID, USAID and DANIDA.
  7. Akotia, C. S., & Anum, A. (2012). The moderating effects of age and education on gender differences on gender role perceptions. Gender and Behaviour, 10(2), 5022-5043.
  8. Amu, M. E. K. & Edjah, H. B. (forthcoming). Males in female dominated fields: home economics case in Ghana.
  9. Amu, M. E. K., Offei-Ansah, C. & Amissah, A. A. (in press). Teaching home economics: A practical approach to teachers and student teachers. Ghana Universities Press.
  10. Anttila, S., Leskinen, J., Posti-Ahokas, H. & Janhonen-Abruquah, H. (2015). Performing gender and agency in Home Economics text book images. In K. Hahl, P-M Niemi, R. Johnson Longfor (Eds.). Diversities and Interculturality in Textbooks: Finland as an Example. Cambridge Scholars, pp. 61-84.
  11. Ajayi, K., & Buessing, M. (2013). Gender Parity and Schooling Choices. 22nd International Association for Feminist Economics (IAFFE) Annual Conference. Stanford University 12- 14th July, 2013, Palo Alto, California
  12. Berg, P., Guttorm, H., Kankkunen, T., Kokko, S., Kuoppamäki, A., Lepistö, J., Turkki, K., Väyrynen, L., & Lehtonen, J. (2011). Tytöille tyttömäistä ja pojille poikamaista - yksilöllisten valintojen viidakossa?: Sukupuolitietoisuus taito-ja taideaineiden opetuksessa ja tutkimuksessa. [Feminine for girls and masculine for boys -in the jungle of individual chooses. Gender awareness in practical and art subjects and research] In J. Lehtonen (Ed.), Sukupuolinäkökulmia tutkimusperustaiseen opettajankoulutukseen (pp. 91-116). Helsinki, Finland: Helsingin yliopisto, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos.
  13. Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H. & Baumgärtner, M. (2008). Perceived Equity in the Gendered Division of Household Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145-1156.
  14. Edjah, H. B & Amu E. K. M. (2012) Correlation of tutor characteristics with student performance in Home Economics at Colleges of Education in Ghana. 56 th Year Book on Teacher Education. ICET
  15. Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2004). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004: National core curriculum for basic education intended for pupils in compulsory education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education -. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteiden luonnos [Draft Core Curriculum for Basic Education]. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/ops2016/perusteluonnokset/perusopetus
  16. Firebaugh, F.M. (1980). Home economics in higher education in the United States: current trends. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 4, 159-165.
  17. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. Multicultural education series. Teachers College Columbia University.
  18. Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48-70.
  19. Ghana Education Service. (2015). Register of programmes and courses for public and private senior high schools, technical and vocational institutes. Retrieved on 28/01/2016 from http://www.ghanawaec.org/Portals/0/PDF/SCHOOL%20REGISTER%202015%20FINAL _prog.pdf
  20. Helgeson, V. S. (2009). The psychology of gender. USA: Pearson.
  21. Holli, A. M., Magnusson, E., & Rönnblom, M. (2005). Critical studies of Nordic discourses on gender and gender equality. Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 13(03), 148-152.
  22. IFHE (International Federation for Home Economics), (2008). IFHE Position Statement: Home Economics in the 21 st Century. Retrieved from: www.ifhe.org
  23. Janhonen-Abruquah, H., Posti-Ahokas, H., Palojoki, P. & Lehtomäki, E. (2014). Developing Learning Games for Culturally Responsive Home Economics Learning. International Journal of Home Economics. 7(2), 2-16.
  24. Janhonen-Abruquah, H. & Palojoki, P. (eds.) (2015). Creative and responsible Home Economics education: Luova ja vastuullinen kotitalousopetus. Kotitalous-ja käsityötieteiden julkaisuja 38. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
  25. Lahelma, E. (2011). Gender Awareness in Finnish Teacher Education: an Impossible Mission? Education Inquiry, 2(2), 263-276.
  26. Lahelma, E. (2014). Troubling discourses on gender and education. Educational Research, 56(2), 171-183.
  27. Lehtomäki, E., Moate, J. & Posti-Ahokas, H. (2015). Global Connectedness in Higher Education: Student Voices on the Value of Cross-cultural Learning Dialogue. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007943
  28. Lehtonen, J., Palmu, T. H., & Lahelma, E. (2014). Negotiating sexualities, constructing possibilities: Teachers and diversity. In M.-P. Moreau (Ed.), Inequalities in the Teaching Profession: A Global Perspective (pp. 118-138). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Braun, M. (2006). The division of household labour in Germany and Israel. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1147-1164.
  30. Lippeatt, S. F., & Brown, H. I. (1965). Focus and promise of home economics: A family- oriented perspective. Macmillan.
  31. McGregor, S. L.T. (2011). Home economics in higher education: pre-professional socialization. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 560-568.
  32. McLeod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 179─189.
  33. Neequaye, N. K., Darkwa, S., & Amu, M. E. K. (2014). Students' perspectives of the food and nutrition program at the University of Cape Coast Home Economics department and its implication on curriculum change. Science, 2(1), 4─11.
  34. Nukynua G. K. (2003) Tradition and Change in Ghana. Accra, Ghana: University Press.
  35. Pendergast, D. (2001). Virginal Mothers, Groovy Chicks and Blokey Blokes: Re-thinking Home Economics (and) Teaching Bodies. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
  36. Pettersson, M. (2007). Att genuszappa på säker eller minerad mark: hem-och konsumentkunskap ur ett könsperspektiv. [Gender zapping on safe or mined ground: Home economics and consumer studies from a gender perspective] Doctoral Dissertation, Gothenburg University.
  37. Pipping Ekström, M., & Hjälmeskog, K. (2006). 150 år av 'outsourcing' av hemarbete. [150 years of out sourcing domestic work].
  38. In K. Hjälmeskog (Ed.), Lärarprofession i förändring: från "skolkök" till hem-och konsumentkunskap (pp. 171-191). Uppsala, Sweden: Föreningen för Svensk Undervisningshistoria.
  39. Posti-Ahokas, H., Janhonen-Abruquah, H. & Longfor, R. (2015). Urban spaces for intercultural encounters: cultural plunges for future teachers. World Studies in Education, 16, (2), 45-55.
  40. Ronkainen, S. (2001). Gendered violence and genderless gender: A Finnish perspective. Kvinder, Kön och Forskning, 2/2001, 45-57.
  41. Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 995-1015.
  42. Saleem, N. (1998). Development of Home Economics extension programme for Socio- Economic uplift of the underprivileged. Doctoral Thesis. University of Punjab, Lahore
  43. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  44. Stambach, A. 2000. Lessons from Mount Kilimanjaro: schooling, community, and gender in East Africa. New York: Routledge.
  45. Thompson, P. J. (1986). Beyond gender. Equity issues for home economics education. Theory into Practice. 25(4), 276-283.
  46. Turkki, K. (2005). Pre-professionals' perceptions of home economics in Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 273-282.
  47. Turkki, K. (2009). Koti ja kotitalous -elinikäistä oppimista ja kasvamista vastuullisuuteen [Home and home economics -life long learning and growing towards responsible living] .
  48. In J. Lampinen & M. Melén-Paaso (Eds.), Tulevaisuus meissä: Kasvaminen maailmanlaajuiseen vastuuseen (pp. 101-107). Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 40. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
  49. Turkki, K. (2011). Kotitalouskasvatuksella tasa-arvoa.[Equality through home economics education] In Lehtonen, J. (ed.) 2011. Sukupuolinäkökulmia tutkimusperustaiseen opettajankoulutukseen. TASUKO-hanke, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Helsingin yliopisto, pp. 103-106.
  50. Turkki, K. (2012). Home Economics -A Forum for Global Learning and Responsible Living. In D. Pendergast, S LT McGregor & K. Turkki (Eds.), Creating Home Economics Futures. The Next 100 Years. Australian Academic Press.
  51. Venäläinen,S.(2010). Interaction in the Multicultural Classroom: Towards Culturally Sensitive Home Economics Education. Home Economics and Craft Studies Research Reports. Helsinki, Finland: University Print.
  52. Venäläinen, S. (2015). Arjen tiedot ja taidot hyvinvoinnin perustana. Kotitalouden oppimistulokset perusopetuksen päättövaiheessa 2014. [National Home Economics learning assessment]. Kansallinen koulutuksen arviointikeskus. Tampere. Juvenes Print - Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy.
  53. Vidén, S. & Naskali, P. 2010. Sukupuolitietoisuus Lapin yliopiston opettajankoulutuksessa [Gender awareness in teacher education at the University of Lapland]. Lapin yliopiston kasvatustieteellisiä julkaisuja 22. Rovaniemi.
  54. Wahlen, S., Posti-Ahokas, H., Collins, E. (2009). Linking the Loop -voicing dimensions of Home Economics. International Journal of Home Economics. 2(2), 32-47.
  55. Wolff, K. (2007). Content analysis. In G. Ritzer (Ed) Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.