Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods

2009, Journal of Environmental Management

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2007.09.011

Abstract

Environmental economists have long used surveys to gather information about people's preferences. A recent innovation in survey methodology has been the advent of web-based surveys. While the Internet appears to offer a promising alternative to conventional survey administration modes, concerns exist over potential sampling biases associated with web-based surveys and the effect these may have on valuation estimates. This paper compares results obtained from a travel cost questionnaire of visitors to Fraser Island, Australia, that was conducted using two alternate survey administration modes; conventional mail and web-based. It is found that response rates and the socio-demographic makeup of respondents to the two survey modes are not statistically different. Moreover, both modes yield similar consumer surplus estimates.

References (23)

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006. Household Use of Information Technology: 2005-06. Catalogue No. 8146.0, Canberra.
  2. Berrens, R., Bohara, A., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., Weimer, D., 2003. The advent of Internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and Internet samples. Political Analysis 11, 1-22.
  3. Blomquist, G., Whitehead, J., 1998. Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation. Resource and Energy Economics 20, 179-196.
  4. Champ, P., 2003. Collecting survey data for nonmarket valuation. In: Champ, P., Boyle, K., Brown, T. (Editors), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp.59-98.
  5. Clawson, M., Knetsch, J., 1966. Economics of Outdoor Recreation, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  6. Clough, P., Meister, A., 1991. Allowing for multiple-site visitors in travel cost analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 32, 115-125.
  7. EDAW, 2002. Fraser Island Desired Site Capacities Study: Final Report. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane.
  8. Hadwen, W., Arthington, A., 2003. The significance and management implications of perched dune lakes as swimming and recreation sites on Fraser Island, Australia. Journal of Tourism Studies 14, 35-44.
  9. Hanley, N., Spash, C., 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
  10. Iraguen, P., Ortuzar, J., 2004. Willingness-to-pay for reducing fatal accident risk in urban areas: An Internet-based web page stated preference survey. Accident Analysis and Prevention 36, 513-524.
  11. Johnstone, C., Markandya, A., 2006. Valuing river characteristics using combined site choice and participation travel cost models. Journal of Environmental Management 80, 237-247.
  12. Kay, B., Johnson, T., 1999. Research methodology: Taming the cyber frontier. Techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review 17, 323-337.
  13. Li, H., Berrens, R., Bohara, A., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., Weimer, D., 2004. Would developing country commitments affect US households' support for a modified Kyoto Protocol? Ecological Economics 48, 329-343.
  14. Madge, C., 2006. Online questionnaires: Advantages and disadvantages of online questionnaires. [Online]. Available: http://www.geog.le.ac.uk/ORM/questionnaires/quesads.htm. Accessed 1 November.
  15. Manfreda, K. 2001. Web Survey Errors. PhD Thesis. University of Ljubljani.
  16. Marta-Pedroso, C., Freitas, H., Domingos, T., 2007. Testing for the survey mode effect on contingent valuation data quality: A case study of web based versus in-person interviews. Ecological Economics (in press).
  17. Munro, A., Hanley, N., 2001. Information, uncertainty, and contingent valuation. In: Bateman, I., Willis, K. (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.258-274.
  18. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Australian National Periodic Report: Section II, Report on the State of Conservation of Fraser Island. Brisbane.
  19. Schwappach, D., Strasmann, T., 2006. "Quick and dirty numbers"? The reliability of a stated- preference technique for the measurement of preferences for resource allocation. Journal of Health Economics 25, 432-448.
  20. Smith, V. K., 1993. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal. Land Economics 69, 1-26.
  21. Tsuge, T., Washida, T., 2003. Economic valuation of the Seto Inland Sea by using an Internet CV survey. Marine Pollution Bulletin 47, 230-236.
  22. UNESCO, 2007. Fraser Island -UNESCO World Heritage Centre. [Online]. Available: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/630. Accessed 8 March.
  23. Wilson, C., Tisdell, C., 2004. Attitudes to entry fees to National Parks: Results and policy implications from a Queensland case study. Economic Analysis and Policy 34, 79-102.