Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
References
All Topics
Political Science
Security Studies

Terrorism and government: between history and criminology

Profile image of Mark FinnaneMark Finnane
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865813483296
visibility

…

description

26 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Incontestably the decade since 9/11 has been the pre-eminent age of terrorism. Or has it? In this lecture we consider terrorism as an object of government and of academic research. In arguing that law and criminology have been the pre-eminent disciplines attending to governmental responses to terrorism we note that their interventions have been significant in both their critical stance and in their impact in shaping discourse about the tactics and limits of counter-terrorism, particularly legislation and its uses. But what understanding of the broader role of government in responding to terrorism emerges from such a literature? And what histories are available to inform such an understanding? Existing historical accounts of Australian security and intelligence as a response to political violence and terrorism are for the most part dominated by Cold War politics and ideology, especially through their preoccupation with the politics of intelligence organisations. Increasing availability of security archives, together with a more international view of the context of Australian counter-terrorism histories, provide a sounder base for assessing the emergence of terrorism as an object of government attention since the 1970s.

Related papers

Review of Lippert, Walby, Warren, and Palmer’s National Security, Surveillance and Terror: Canada and Australia in Comparative Perspective
Colleen Bell

Surveillance & Society

View PDFchevron_right
Beyond Terrorism: The Development of Australian Security StateJenny Hocking St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin, 1993. xii + 236 pp
Stuart Farson

Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 1995

attempt to extend this analysis to the concrete problems of the Canadian Constitution falls to the same problems as Tully's project remains to be seen. The wide range of the papers makes the job of pulling the volume together particularly difficult. Philip Bryden does an admirable job of identifying some of the papers' common themes and blends some insights from the work of British Columbia's Civil Liberties Association into his introductory essay. He is surprised that not all the authors saw fit to celebrate the Charter's tenth anniversary. Simpson's contribution aside, though, the various authors seem to agree that by expanding our bloated welfare state, advancing the feminist cause, giving criminal lawyers more ways to argue their cases and further eroding the status of the traditional family, the Charter has made Canadian life better. There is a political constituency in Canada that opposes these developments. A government could well come to office in Canada with its support and give us a Canadian Edwin Meese. In that case, the conferences marking the Charter's quarter-century anniversary would be interesting indeed.

View PDFchevron_right
Counter-terrorism in Australia: practitioner perspectives
Sam Mullins

Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 2016

This article presents the views of 11 senior police officers (both state and federal) who have been directly involved in counter-terrorism (CT) in Australia over the past 15 years. Utilising direct quotes from interviews conducted by the author between April 2012 and November 2015, it offers unique insight into their views on a variety of issues including: first experiences in CT, the unique nature of terrorism investigations, interagency cooperation, Joint Counter-Terrorism Teams, and challenges relating to lack of technical interoperability, the complexities of CT legislation and cultural barriers between agencies and how these have been overcome.

View PDFchevron_right
Reframing Anti-Terrorism Proscription Policy and Powers in Australia: Submission to the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor (INSLM)
Lee Jarvis

Proscription is principally deployed as a means to (i) signal government’s disapproval of the ideas of an organisation deemed to be involved in terrorism, and (ii) empower policing and security agencies to dismantle the organisation’s capacity to further those ideas by confiscating resources, financial or otherwise, and prohibiting membership of the association. Yet, while there is a long history of the use of proscription powers in Australia and elsewhere, the legal and policy rationale for banning terrorist organisations has not kept pace with the evolving dimensions of international migration, domestic extremism, and political violence. In this submission, we put forward an alternative framework of proscription that seeks to mitigate some of the concerns that have been raised regarding the transparency, appropriateness and ‘heavy-handedness’ of current proscription powers. It is our view that proscription should be just one of a raft of instruments to tackle extremist violence associated with organisations. It is well-understood that extremism is an area of some subjectivity, particularly with regard to legal definitions of terrorism and organisation and the practical implications for proscription that follow. The framework put forward here seeks to provide government with a range of instruments that enhance the ability of government to (i) clarify whether an organisation is, in fact, oriented towards undertaking or supporting extremist violence; (ii) determine what sanction, if any, is appropriate; (iii) diminish the capacity of organisations to use or support the use of violence.

View PDFchevron_right
The Proscription of Terrorist Organisations in Australia
Andrew Lynch

Federal Law Review, 2009

Crime and Politics' in Miriam Gani and Penelope Mathew (eds), Fresh Perspectives on the 'War on Terror' (2008) 297, 308. Additionally, we acknowledge the drawbacks clearly identified by Clive Walker in respect of the United Kingdom's proscription of the Irish Republican Army in his seminal study The Prevention of Terrorism in British Law (1986) 50-1. 13 Ben Golder and George Williams, 'What is "Terrorism"? Problems of Legal Definition' (2004) 27 University of New South Wales Law Journal 270. 14 Saul reports that, on available evidence in 2004, 86 nation states prosecuted terrorism as an ordinary crime, while 46 employed 'simple terrorism offences' and a further 48 had 'composite terrorism offences': Ben Saul, Defining Terrorism in International Law (2006) 264-9. Additionally, significant strides have been made in the last decade in producing a general definition of 'terrorism' in international law:

View PDFchevron_right
Australian and the 'War against Terrorism': Terrorism, National Security and Human Rights
Mark Rix

2007

This paper considers whether in the 'war against terrorism' national security is eroded or strengthened by weakening or removing the human rights of the individuals who constitute the polity. It starts with the view that national security is, at its most fundamental, founded upon the security and liberty of the person from criminal and violent acts, including terrorist attacks. Such attacks, and the individuals and groups who perpetrate them, constitute a grave threat to the peace and security of nations the world over and thus endanger the security and liberty of the individuals who make up their populations. Governments are therefore compelled to use the machinery of the state to protect the nation and the individual from these attacks. However, the paper is based on another, equally important, assumption. This is that the defence of national security requires individuals to be protected from the arbitrary exercise of state power even in situations where the state claims to be acting to protect national security and individual security against grave threats such as terrorist acts. The rule of law not only protects individuals from such an exercise of state power by protecting their human rights, in so doing it also protects the peace and security of the nation from excessive and unchecked state power. But what happens when the rule of law is overturned by governments declaring that they are protecting national security from the terrorist threat? Who or what is then able to protect the individual and the nation from the state? This paper will take up these important questions by considering the implications of the anti-terrorism legislation that has been introduced in Australia since September 2001. It will also consider whether Australia's national security has been enhanced or damaged by this legislation.

View PDFchevron_right
Trends in Global Terrorist Activity and Austalia's Counter-terrorism Measures
Andrew Markey

Terrorism has evolved over the first part of the 21st century into a phenomena that is increasingly globalised, with extremist groups utilising contemporary technological advancements in everything from resourcing weaponry and executing their attacks to communicating with members and recruiting. As such, several trends have emerged, both in the commission of terrorist acts, and in the legislative responses to them. Section 1 of this report aims to outline major trends in terrorist activity over the past five years, particularly the number of incidents by country, the number of fatalities by country, choices in weapon type, and the number of incidents by prominent groups. Section 2 focuses on the primary pieces of counter-terrorism legislation as ratified by the Australian Federal Government in 2014. They relate to security and intelligence-gathering powers afforded to Australia's intelligence agencies, legislative instruments outlining contemporary terrorism offences, and the legal mechanisms needed to investigate and prosecute said offences. Finally, Section 3 of this report seeks to elaborate on the direct relationship between the evolution of terrorism and the policy reactions to contemporary terrorism; through applying critical terrorism theories found in the literature, it is shown that current domestic policy measures act to increase radicalisation processes in Australia rather than impede terrorist activity.

View PDFchevron_right
Intelligence, Terrorism and the State
Peter Gill

State Power Crime, 2009

What appears to be a ‘security panic’ in the wake of the September 2001 attacks in the United States, suggests parallels between the moral panic surrounding ‘mugging’ that inspired and informed the analysis of the relationship between the state and law and order in Policing the Crisis (1978) and the current concerns of the ‘war on terror’. However, while there are similarities, a direct comparison between 1970s ‘street robbery’ and 2000s ‘political violence’ would be rather artificial. Therefore, drawing on the theoretical framework for understanding the relation between state, law and violence set out in Policing the Crisis, this chapter compares events in Northern Ireland after 1969 with current concerns over ‘terrorism’.

View PDFchevron_right
Australia and the 'War against Terrorism': Terrorism, National Security and Human Rights
Mark Rix

2007

This paper considers whether in the 'war against terrorism' national security is eroded or strengthened by weakening or removing the human rights of the individuals who constitute the polity. It starts with the view that national security is, at its most fundamental, founded upon the security and liberty of the person from criminal and violent acts, including terrorist attacks. Such attacks, and the individuals and groups who perpetrate them, constitute a grave threat to the peace and security of nations the world over and thus endanger the security and liberty of the individuals who make up their populations. Governments are therefore compelled to use the machinery of the state to protect the nation and the individual from these attacks. However, the paper is based on another, equally important, assumption. This is that the defence of national security requires individuals to be protected from the arbitrary exercise of state power even in situations where the state claims to be acting to protect national security and individual security against grave threats such as terrorist acts. The rule of law not only protects individuals from such an exercise of state power by protecting their human rights, in so doing it also protects the peace and security of the nation from excessive and unchecked state power. But what happens when the rule of law is overturned by governments declaring that they are protecting national security from the terrorist threat? Who or what is then able to protect the individual and the nation from the state? This paper will take up these important questions by considering the implications of the anti-terrorism legislation that has been introduced in Australia since September 2001. It will also consider whether Australia's national security has been enhanced or damaged by this legislation.

View PDFchevron_right
With reckless abandon: Haneef and Ul-Haque in Australia's 'War on Terror&apos
Mark Rix

2008

This brief paper considers the political and social implications of the manner in which Australia has prosecuted the so-called 'war on terror'. It does this by investigating relevant aspects of Australia's antiterrorism legislation and the performance of Australian security and law enforcement agencies, namely, the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP). Focusing on the Haneef and Ul-Haque cases, the paper will consider how the political climate created by the former Federal Government's legislative approach to the war on terror has influenced the performance of these organisations. By focusing on these two cases, the paper will demonstrate how racial, ethnic and religious stereotyping have informed and shaped Australia's conduct of the war on terror. It will investigate the real potential for social division, and heightened national insecurity, that flows from the use and propagation of these stereotypes. The paper will also highlight the unfairness and prejudice that are inherent to racial and religious stereotyping. Finally, the paper will consider whether the Rudd Labor Government's approach thus far to the war on terror differs in any significant measure from that of its predecessor and evaluate the prospects for real, progressive change.

View PDFchevron_right

References (61)

  1. References: Aarons M (2001) War criminals welcome: Australia, a sanctuary for fugitive war criminals since 1945. Melbourne: Black Inc.
  2. Andrew CM (2009) The defence of the realm: the authorized history of MI5. Lane, Allen.
  3. Ball D and Horner DM (1998) Breaking the codes: Australia's KGB network 1944-1950. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  4. Bashford A and Strange C (2002) Asylum-seekers and national histories of detention. Australian Journal of Politics and History 48(4): 509-527.
  5. Bevege M (1993) Behind Barbed Wire: Internment in Australia During WorldWar II. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
  6. Briggs E (2011) The Munich Massacre: a New History. Honours, University of Sydney Department of History. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7980.
  7. Burke A (2008) Fear of Security: Australia's Invasion Anxiety. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Cain F (1994) The Australian Security Intelligence Organization: an unofficial history. Richmond, Vic.: Spectrum Publications.
  9. Cain F (2008) Terrorism & Intelligence in Australia: A History of ASIO& National Surveillance. North Melbourne, Vic: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
  10. FAD Paper No 23: Policy and Organisation to Counter International Terrorism -Ministers Responsible: Mr Ellicott (Attorney-General) and Mr Withers (Administrative Services) -presented at FAD Committee meeting 27 September 1976 -Decision No 1657(FAD) -File No LC942 (1976). file. Canberra. Available at: http://www.naa.gov.au/cgi-bin/Search?O=I&Number=8938786. Finnane M (2007) J V Barry: a Life. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  11. Finnane M (2013) The Munich Olympics massacre and the development of counter-terrorism in Australia. forthcoming.
  12. Hall R (1978) The secret state: Australia's spy industry. Stanmore, N.S.W.: Cassell Australia.
  13. Head M (2009) Calling Out the Troops: The Australian Military and Civil Unrest: The Legal. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.
  14. Hocking J (1993) Beyond Terrorism: The Development of the Australian Security State. St Leonards, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin. Finnane: Terrorism and government, pre-print, published in ANZ Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, No. 2 (August 2013), 159-177
  15. Hocking J (1997) Lionel Murphy: a political biography. Cambridge ; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hocking J (2004) Terror laws: ASIO, counter-terrorism and the threat to democracy. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  17. Horner DM (2002) SAS: phantoms of war: a history of the Australian Special Air Service. St Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.
  18. Irving H (2009) Australia. In: Thiel M (ed) The "Militant Democracy" Principle in Modern Democracies.
  19. Ashgate. Jones DM (2010) Intelligence and national security: The Australian experience. The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence. Oxford: OUP, 823-842. Available at: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:230143.
  20. Manne R (1987) The Petrov affair: politics and espionage. Sydney: Pergamon.
  21. McDonald K (2007) Terrorism. In: Galligan B and Roberts W (eds) The Oxford Companion to Australian Politics. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  22. McKnight D (1994) Australia's spies and their secrets. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  23. McKnight D (2008a) Partisan Improprieties: Ministerial Control and Australia's Security Agencies, 1962-72. Intelligence and National Security 23(5): 707.
  24. McKnight D (2008b) Rethinking Cold War History. Labour History (95): 185-196.
  25. McMaster D (2001) Asylum Seekers: Australia's Response to Refugees. Melbourne, Vic: Melbourne University Press.
  26. Mickolus EF (1980) Transnational terrorism: a chronology of events, 1868-1979. London: Aldwych Press.
  27. Mullins S (2011) Islamist Terrorism and Australia: An Empirical Examination of the "Home-Grown" Threat. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(2): 254-285.
  28. Neumann K (2004) Refuge Australia: Australia's Humanitarian Record. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  29. Neumann K (2006) In the interest of national security: civilian internment in Australia during World War II. Canberra: National Archives of Australia.
  30. Neumann K and Tavan G (eds) (2009) Does history matter?: making and debating citizenship, immigration and refugee policy in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: ANU E Press. Available at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/.
  31. Nicholls G (2007) Deported: a history of forced departures from Australia. Sydney, N.S.W.: UNSW Press. Finnane: Terrorism and government, pre-print, published in ANZ Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, No. 2 (August 2013), 159-177
  32. O'Donnell K (2011) From guns, gates and guards: the development of Australia's federal critical infrasturcture policy, 1978-2010. Master of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Honours), Griffith University.
  33. Reeve S (2011) One Day in September: The Full Story of the 1972 Munich Olympics Massacre and the Israeli Revenge Operation "Wrath of God". New York: Arcade Publishing.
  34. Roach K (2011) The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Saul B (2006) Defining Terrorism in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. Saunders K (1992) War on the homefront: state intervention in Queensland 1938-1948. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
  37. Submission No 3810: Review of policy and organisation in relation to counter terrorism -Related to Decision No 10757(IS) and 10921(IS) (1980). file. Canberra. Available at: http://www.naa.gov.au/cgi- bin/Search?O=I&Number=30484239.
  38. Waghorne J and Macintyre S (2011) Liberty: a history of civil liberties in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  39. Wardlaw G (1982) Political Terrorism: Theory, Tactics, and Counter-Measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Williams G (2011) A decade of Australian anti-terror laws. Melbourne University Law Review 35: 1136-1197.
  41. 1 Draft resolutions at the UN General Assembly, 27 Nov 1972, 'International terrorism', National Archives of Australia (NAA) A1838, 912/17 Part 2. For the context of debates at the UN see (Saul, 2006: 71-4; Wardlaw, 1982: 105-8)
  42. 'Possible condolence motion in the House on terrorism [September 1972]', International terrorism, NAA A1838, 912/17 Part 2. The recognition of the large Lebanese community was prescient, although it should be noted that Lebanese migration before 1980 was largely Christian. For the significance of Lebanese heritage among so-called 'home-grown terrorists' in Australia in recent years see (Mullins, 2011: 267)
  43. 'Terrorism and violence in Australia' (Cabinet file re decision 1406, 10 Oct 1972, including Submission 896) NAA A5882 (A5882/2), CO1528.
  44. 4 International law and law enforcement to combat acts of terrorism against civil aviation [Submission No 202 refers], NAA A5931, CL202.
  45. The [portion of title exempt] Report -Visit to ASIO Headquarters by Attorney-General 16 and 23 March 1973, fol. 11, NAA A12383, A/18/2.
  46. Finnane: Terrorism and government, pre-print, published in ANZ Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, No. 2 (August 2013), 159-177
  47. 6 'Minutes of conference at Attorney-General's Department on 30 August 1973 to discuss possible terrorist activities by Black September Movement in Australia', Interdepartmental Committee on counter terrorism -Part 1, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111.
  48. Conference at Attorney-General's Department on 5 October 1973 to review action in respect of possible terrorist activities in Australia, Interdepartmental Committee on counter terrorism -Part 1, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111.
  49. Age, 19 Sep 1973, pp 1,5; Age, 20 Sep 1973, p 15; SMH, 26 Sep 1973, p 1. The following account draws on relevant archives files, in particular 'Entry into Australia -Abdul Hamid Abdulla Azzam Al Fatah -Agent', NAA A1838, 1453/4531 Part 1.
  50. 9 Commonwealth of Australia. Parliament, Hansard, 7 Nov 1973 (qn by Senator Greenwood);
  51. 26 Sep 1973 (Murphy). In September 1976 an ASIO advice to the Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee of Cabinet on 'Pro Palestinian Terrorists in Australia' reported 'The Israeli Security Service claimed that AZZAM was the leader of the Black September commando which attached the Israeli Embassy in Bangkok in December 1972 and that he had probably been involved in the despatch of letter bombs around the world': ("FAD Paper No 23," 1976). This of course does not indicate anything about the possibility that Israeli officers had interviewed Azzam in Australia.
  52. In December another security deportation was reported, this time an alleged 'Black September agent': Inside Canberra, Dec 14, 1973, press cutting in NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111.
  53. Five Palestinian commandos had stormed the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Paris and taken hostages, demanding the release from Jordan of Abu Daoud, the 'architect' of the Munich hostage taking. The protracted outcome involved negotiations for the terrorists to leave the country with a number of Saudi hostages on a place supplied by the Syrian government: (Mickolus, 1980: 406-7).
  54. Draft minutes of meeting at Attorney-General's Department, Canberra on 18 September 1973 to further consider the 'Draft Plan for Anti-Terrorist Action', (p. 6 of draft plan) Interdepartmental Committee on counter terrorism -Part 1, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111 13 (Reeve, 2011). This was well known at the time in Australia by virtue of ASIO's wide circulation in early 1973 of a translated copy of the German government's internal review of the Munich disaster: 'The Surprise Attack on the Israeli Olympic Team: documentation by Finnane: Terrorism and government, pre-print, published in ANZ Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, No. 2 (August 2013), 159-177
  55. the Federal Government [of Germany] and the Free State of Bavaria', Terrorist attack on Israeli athletes competing at the Olympic Games, Munich 1972, NAA A1209, 1972/6887. 14 Draft minutes of meeting at Attorney-General's Department, Canberra on 18 September 1973 to further consider the 'Draft Plan for Anti-Terrorist Action', (p. 5 of draft plan) Interdepartmental Committee on counter terrorism -Part 1, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111 15 For the background proposals, and the Operational Plan for 'Special Precautions', see Letter from L S J Harper to the Secretary, Department of Immigration, 23 November 1973, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111.
  56. See also Guidelines for the Special Interdepartmental Committee on Counter-Terrorism [March 1976], Special Interdepartmental Committee on Counter Terrorism -Part 4, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250917.
  57. Minutes of the second regular meeting of the Special Interdepartmental Committee ... held [at] the Attorney-General's Department ... 19 December 1973, Interdepartmental Committee on counter terrorism -Part 1, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111. For the Rome attack see (Mickolus, 1980: 422-3) -the five Rome terrorists were subsequently imprisoned in Egypt but then released to Libya in December 1974 following a further hi-jacking of a BOAC aircraft.
  58. Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Special Interdepartmental Committee on Counter- Terrorism held ... 19 March 1974, Interdepartmental Committee on Counter Terrorism 1974 - Part 2, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250143. The ASIO file on one Aboriginal activist discloses some of the concerns in play over Aboriginal protest, including alarm at Aboriginal protests during Queen's visit; visits to China by Aborigines; and reports from Papua New Guinea of visits of Aboriginal activists from Australia including Foley: 'Foley, Gary -Volume 1', NAA, A6119, 3871. 19 ("Submission No 3810," 1980).
  59. In 1975 in fact Darwin had been withdrawn from the international airport network and Alice Springs was to be the location for handling any hijacking situations in North Australia: 'Minutes of the Regular Meeting … 8 January 1975', Interdepartmental Committee on Counter Terrorism, 1975 -Part 3, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250788.
  60. See especially Interdepartmental Committee on Counter Terrorism, 1975 -Part 3, NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250788
  61. Inside Canberra, Dec 14, 1973, press cutting in NAA A6980 (A6980T1), S250111.

Related papers

Be alarmed? Australia's anti-terrorism kit and the politics of security, GCPS, 2005
Matt McDonald

Global Change, Peace & Security, 2005

View PDFchevron_right
Countering Home-Grown Terrorists in Australia: An Overview of Legislation, Policy and Actors Since 2001
Michael Crowley

2010

This article explores the impact of counter-terrorism legislation and policy in Australia. In particular it explores how legislation facilitated prosecution and conviction of persons involved in home-grown terrorism, including analysis of investigation and prosecution policy surrounding the ul-Haque and Haneef cases. Particular attention is given to the terrorism trials involving Benbrika & Ors and Elomar & Ors. What makes these trials intriguing is the fact that most of those convicted could be more easily described as more vulnerable than menacing. Sentencing of those convicted was cognate with no policies for rehabilitation. The small number of convictions under the legislation when considered against the increased funding of counter-terrorism, loss of traditional rights and privileges and Australia's involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq raises issues about adequate policy setting in this area.

View PDFchevron_right
Australian National Counter Terrorism White Paper - Current and future impact on domestic terrorism issues in Australia
Agio Pereira

Last year the world faced the threat of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, otherwise known as ISIS. For Australia, last year also ended with a terrifying reality; that it is not free from lone-wolf terrorism and it needs to review its counter-terrorism concepts and acquire better understanding as to how to deal with extremely difficult cases like Man Haron Monis and his siege of Martin Place cafe, held hostages, including killings, on 16 December 2014. ISIS and Monis remind Australian leaders that the interconnectedness of terrorism motives is not just a theory; it's real and troublesome and it requires in-depth understanding of what actually holds this web together to such a long time already and highly likely for even longer time ahead. Blaming the legal system alone is not the answer; blaming shortage of financial resources is also not an answer. The answer lies precisely in understanding what is it exactly that moves young men, who otherwise would be normal people striving for a carrier and happy existence, to give everything up including their own lives. This paper was written as an essay on counter-terrorism; and due to the current politics of counter-terrorism in Australia, it is integrated here for the benefit of those who are interested in different perspectives on the strategies to counter Terrorism.

View PDFchevron_right
From Definition to Application – Contemporary Aims and Measures in Australia's Counter-terrorism Framework
Andrew Markey
View PDFchevron_right
The Munich Olympics massacre and the development of counter-terrorism in Australia
Mark Finnane

Intelligence and National Security, 2015

Counter-terrorism is a product of government, identifying as its target a kind of violence defined as terrorism. This article explores a particular moment in this process, as an intersection of international, national and bureaucratic responses to the Munich Olympics massacre of 1972. Australian understandings of the development of counter-terrorism have been dominated by a number of themes – principally by the Hilton Bombing of 1978 and the subsequent acceleration of security re-structuring during the Fraser years, by the collapse of the Cold War focus of the security and intelligence agencies at the end of the 1980s and then by the ‘war on terror’ following 9/11 and the Bali bombing. Counter-terrorist planning was however an emerging business of government in the 1970s, in Australia as in its alliance partner the United States. While the Hope Royal Commission into intelligence agencies (1974-7) has dominated attention in accounts of the development of counter-terrorism, a 1972 Interdepartmental Committee on Terrorism and Violence in Australia anticipated many of its concerns. This paper contextualises the Munich massacre as one of the factors shaping a re-thinking of security and policing strategies in the early 1970s, a moment in the emergence of a modern government of terrorism.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Security Studies
  • Political Violence and Terrorism

    • Cited by

    Whither Criminology: Its Global Futures?
    Sandra Walklate

    Asian Journal of Criminology, 2016

    This paper takes as its starting point the recent interventions of Jock Young (2011) on the contemporary state of criminology. In adding to these observations those made by Connell (2007) and Aas (2012), the case will be made, following de Sousa Santos (2014), for a criminology of absences. In endeavouring to uncover these absences, the paper will consider how the 'bogus of positivism' (Young 2011, chapter 4), its associated presumptions and related conceptual thinking, manifest themselves in two substantive areas of contemporary concern: violence against women and violent extremism. With the first of these issues I shall consider the ongoing controversies in which the bogus of positivism is most apparent: the powerful influence of the criminal victimisation survey as the data gathering instrument about such violence. In the second area of concern, this bogus of positivism is most apparent in its 'nomothetic impulse' (ibid: 73). Both of these discussions will expose different, but connected absences within criminology. In the final and concluding part of this paper, I shall return to the questions posed by the title of this paper: whither criminology, and in the light of this discussion, offer some thoughts on the place of Asian criminology within criminology's global future(s).

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved