Smart city governance in Mexico: reflections from a case study
2021
Abstract
Urban centres around the world are currently experiencing an unforeseen set of challenges. These are derived from an increasing demand for basic services, which include a more efficient management of financial and technical resources. In this sense, an area that is currently looking for new strategies to solve this problem is Latin America, being Mexico City one of the most important cases. The Mexican capital is one of the most populated cities in the world, currently holding large levels of cultural, economic and social disparities. To solve this, urban planners, computer developers and social experts have developed a solution known as “smart cities”. This concept operates through the combination of intelligent technology, urban planning and citizen collaboration. Nonetheless, this requires a new model of governance that allows the interaction among the parties to be not only efficient but secure and law compliant. In the current paper, this scenario will be delivered from the per...
References (44)
- A HISTORY of Data Collection, Storage, and Analysis (website). GutCheck. 2018. Available at: https://www.gutcheckit.com/blog/a-history-of-da- ta/. Accessed Apr. 18 2020.
- AL-HADER, Mahmoud; SHARIF, Abdul; RODZI, Ahmad; AHMAD, Noor- din. "SOA of Smart City Geospatial Management" (2009) Proceedings of the EMS -Third UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Athens, Greece, November, v. 25-27, pp. 6-10, 2009.
- ANGELIDOU, Margarita. Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, v. 47, pp. 95-106, 2015.
- BERRA, Mariella. De la ciudad digital a la ciudad incluyente: La construcción de un capital sociotécnico. Sociológica (México), v. 28(79), pp.7-49, 2013.
- CÁMARA DE DIPUTADOS. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexi- canos. México: Cámara de Diputados, 2012.
- CÁMARA DE DIPUTADOS. Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados. México: Cámara de Diputados, 2017.
- CÁMARA DE DIPUTADOS. Congreso de la Unión. Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de los Particulares. México: Cámara de Diputados, 2017a.
- CÁMARA DE DIPUTADOS. Código Federal de Procedimientos Penales. Méxi- co: Cámara de Diputados, 2020.
- CARDULLO, Paolo; KITCHIN, Rob. Being a 'citizen'in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ire- land. GeoJournal, v. 84.1., pp. 1-13, 2019.
- JIRÓN, P.; IMILÁN, W. A.; LANGE, C.; MANSILLA, P. Placebo urban inter- ventions: Observing smart city narratives in Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 2020.
- JOHNSON, P. A.; ROBINSON, P. J.; PHILPOT, S. Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen. Government Information Quarterly, v. 37(1), pp. 101-414, 2020.
- JOHNSTON, Erik W.; HANSEN, Derek L. Design lessons for smart gover- nance infrastructures. In: Dwight Ink, Alan P. Balutis and Terry F. Buss, (eds.), American Governance 3.0: Rebooting the Public Square? (National Academy of Public Administration), 2011.
- KUMMITHA R. K. R.; CRUTZEN, N. How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, v. 67, pp. 43-52, 2017.
- LIM, Chiehyeon; KIM, Kwang-Jae; MAGLIO, Paul P. Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities, v. 82, pp. 86-99, 2018.
- MAUHER, Mladen; SMOKVINA, Vanja. Digital to intelligent local govern- ment transition framework. MIPRO 2006, 29th International Conven- tion, 2006.
- MARCHETTI, D.; OLIVEIRA, R.; FIGUEIRA, A. R. Are global north smart city models capable to assess Latin American cities? A model and indi- cators for a new context. Cities, 2019.
- MEIJER, Albert; RODRÍGUEZ BOLÍVAR, Manuel Pedro. Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. In- ternational Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 82, no. 2, p. 393, 2016. MEXICO. CONSEJO DE LA JUDICATURA FEDERAL. Publicaciones. Nue- vo Sistema de Justicia Penal Oral. Mexico, 2009. Available at: https:// mexico.justia.com/federales/codigos/codigo-federal-de-procedimien- tos-penales/titulo-sexto/capitulo-viii-bis/. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MEXICO. Ley de Geolocalización. Mexico, 2012. Available at: http://www. mexicosos.org/dossier/legislacion/261-ley-geolocalizacion. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MEXICO. Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal. Ley para el Desarrollo del Distrito Federal como Ciudad Digital y del Conocimiento. VI Legis- latura. Mexico, 2012a. Available at: http://www.aldf.gob.mx/archivo- -815a69869b1735c03f73ce34bc0e39c7.pdf. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MEXICO. Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. Amparo directo en revisión 3886/2013. Mexico, 2013. Available at: http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=158606. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MEXICO. Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. Amparo directo 535/2018. Mexico, 2018. Available at: shorturl.at/oCPW8. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MEXICO. Entidades Federativas. Ciudad de México. Pobreza Estatal 2018. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. Mexi- co, 2018a. Available at:https://www.coneval.org.mx/coordinacion/entida- des/DistritoFederal/Paginas/Pobreza_2018.aspx. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MIYASAKI, Masashi. A brief history of data analysis. FlyData. 2015. Avai- lable at: https://www.flydata.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-data analysis/ Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- MOROZOV, E.; BRIA, F. Rethinking the smart city. Democratizing Urban Technology. New York, NY: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, 2018.
- MOSS KANTER, Rosabeth; LITOW, Stanley S. Informed and interconnec- ted: A manifesto for smarter cities. Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3-21, 2009.
- NAM, Taewoo; PARDO, Theresa A. Conceptualizing Smart City with Di- mensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Digital Government Research College Park, MD, pp. 12-15, June 2011.
- NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINIS- TRATION (DOC), Washington, DC. Falling through the net: A Survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. ERIC Clearinghouse, 1995.
- PRISLAN, Kaja; SLAK, Boštjan. Analysis of the Relationship Between Smart Cities, Policing and Criminal Investigation. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, v. 4, p. 399, 2018.
- ROMERO, Alejandro; ELLSTEIN, Arie. Mexico City: Keys and challenges to building a smart city for citizens. Developing Ideas Llorente and Cuen- ca Madrid, Spain, 2018.
- SASSEN, Saskia. Urbanising technology. The Electric City Newspaper. Ur- ban Age Electric City Conference. LSE Cities. 2015. Available at: ht- tps://lsecities.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/the-electric-city-news- paper.pdf. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- SCHOLL, Hans Jochen; BARZILAI-NAHON, Karine; AHN, Jin-Hyuk; PO- POVA, Olga; RE, Barbara. E-commerce and e-government: How do they compare? What can they learn from each other? Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2009), Koloa, Hawaii, pp. 4-7, January, 2009.
- SHAPIRO, Jess M. Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital. Review of Economics & Statistics, v. 88: 2, pp. 324-335, 2006.
- SHELTON, Taylor; LODATO, Thomas, Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non) participation in the making of the smart city. City, v. 4, 2019.
- SECRETARIA DE DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO. Inicia GCDMX Plan Maestro de Conectividad. Gobierno de la Ciudad de México. 2013. Availa- ble at: https://www.sedeco.cdmx.gob.mx/comunicacion/nota/inicia-g- cdmx-plan-maestro-de-conectividad. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- THRIFT, Nigel. The promise of urban informatics: Some speculations. En- vironment and Planning A, v. 46.6, pp. 1263-1266, 2014.
- THRIFT, Nigel. The 'sentient'city and what it may portend. Big Data & Society, v. 1.1, 2014.
- TORRES, J. A. M.; LEAL, E. T.; GALVÁN, G. R.; ALCOCER, U. M. R. Un enfoque basado en datos para predecir eventos delictivos en ciudades inteligentes (a data-driven approach for predicting criminal events in smart cities). Pistas Educativas, v. 41(134), 2019.
- TOWNSEND, Anthony M. Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. WW Norton & Company, 2013.
- TWIZEYIMANA, Jean Damascene; ANNIKA, Andersson. The public value of E-Government-A literature review. Government information quarter- ly, 2019.
- UNITED NATIONS. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. 2018. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-re- vision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed Oct. 25 2020.
- VAN ZOONEN, Liesbet. Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government In- formation Quarterly, v. 33.3, p. 476, 2016.
- WASHBURN, Doug; SINDHU, Usman; BALAOURAS, Stephanie; DINES, Rachel A.; HAYES, Nicholas; NELSON, Lauren E. Helping CIOs un- derstand "smart city" initiatives. Growth 17, no. 2: p. 2. 2009.
- WILLIS, K. S. Whose right to the smart city? In The Right to the Smart City. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019.
- ZANDBERGEN, Dorien. We Are Sensemakers: The (Anti-) politics of Smart City Co-creation. Public Culture, v. 29, no. 3 (83), pp. 539-562, 2017.